PhilosophersTom Regan

Tom Regan

An animal whose life matters to it is a subject-of-a-life: it has rights, and it cannot be used as a resource.

Analytic philosophy1938 · 2017 United StatesPittsburgh

Life

Tom Regan (1938-2017), born in Pittsburgh, taught philosophy at North Carolina State University. In The Case for Animal Rights (1983) he argues that animals whose lives matter to them are 'subjects-of-a-life' with value of their own and rights, and that we may not treat them as mere resources. He is a leading reference for animal rights.

Main works

1983
The Case for Animal Rights

Grounds animal rights in the inherent value of subjects-of-a-life.

2004
Empty Cages

A more accessible, action-oriented version of his thesis: empty the cages rather than enlarge them.

In his own words

« The task facing ARAs is daunting: we must empty the cages, not make them larger. »
Empty Cages (2004), ch. 4
« The less gifted do not exist to serve the interests of the more gifted. »
Empty Cages (2004), ch. 3

Positions

click a row to see the evidence
What makes an action good?Basis of morality
Duty (deontology)Consequences (consequentialism)Character (virtue ethics)Other (divine law, relationships, value creation…)

Animals that are subjects-of-a-life have inherent value and rights: we owe them duties whatever the benefits of using them.

Regan, The Case for Animal Rights (1983)

Do good and evil exist objectively?Status of morality
Anti-realism (morality is human-made)Moral realism (objective moral truths)
Interpretation

Inherent value is a real feature of beings, not a matter of taste or convention.

Regan, The Case for Animal Rights (1983)