ABCDEF
PhilosophersDenis Diderot

Denis Diderot

Gather all human knowledge in the Encyclopédie.

Enlightenment · Materialism1713 – 1784 FranceEnlightenment philosopherMaterialistEditor of the EncyclopédieWriter of dialogues
In short

Denis Diderot (1713 – 1784, France) : enlightenment and materialism. Everything is explained by matter in motion. Matter can feel, and thought arises from organised matter: no need for a separate soul, nor for a God to explain the order of the world. On AskPhilosophy: 4 reconstructed arguments, 5 quotes checked word for word against the original texts, and 3 common beliefs examined; every text carries an authenticity badge (written by the author, posthumous, student notes, reported, apocryphal).

In 30 secondsEverything is explained by matter in motion. Matter can feel, and thought arises from organised matter: no need for a separate soul, nor for a God to explain the order of the world. Diderot did not start out this way: at 33 he still defended God from the order of nature. He changed his mind, then put his boldest ideas in the mouths of characters and kept his best texts in his drawers.
Why he matters

For more than twenty years he edited the Encyclopédie, the great project of the Enlightenment. His Letter on the Blind imagines, a century before Darwin, that badly formed beings die out and only those able to survive and reproduce remain. D'Alembert's Dream is one of the first texts to say that thought comes from living matter.

His times

The son of a cutler from Langres, he lived on translations before the Encyclopédie. His Philosophical Thoughts were condemned to be burned (1746). The Letter on the Blind cost him about a hundred days in prison at Vincennes (1749). After that he published anonymously, under a false name, or not at all: many of his masterpieces appeared only after his death.

His positions

click a row to see the evidence
Does God exist?God
AtheismTheism
Majority interpretation

A deist in 1746 (the order of nature proves God), an atheist and materialist from about 1749, according to most readers. But he never says so in his own name in a signed book: he has Saunderson or "Crudeli" say it, or writes it in texts published after his death.

Where does knowledge come from?Source of knowledge
Empiricism (from experience)Rationalism (from reason)
Majority interpretation

Our ideas, even the most abstract, depend on our senses and the shape of our body: a blind man does not have the same metaphysics or morality as we do.

Can we reach certain truths?Certainty
SkepticismCertainty attainable
Majority interpretation

Doubt is the first step towards truth, and each mind sees through its own glasses. But this doubt serves enquiry: he trusts observation and experiment.

Is the mind more than matter?Mind and body
MaterialismDualism
Stated explicitly

There is only one substance: matter. Sensitivity is a property of matter, and thought comes from organised matter. He says so under his own name, but in a dialogue published 46 years after his death.

Are we truly free?Freedom
Determinism (no free will)Free will
Majority interpretation

Each of our actions is the necessary effect of what we are: free will is an illusion. The physician Bordeu says it in the Dream, but Diderot defends the same idea elsewhere.

Do good and evil exist objectively?Status of morality
Anti-realism (morality is human-made)Moral realism (objective moral truths)
Debated among scholars

There is a morality common to all nations, grounded in human nature. But many "virtues" are mere conventions, often religious, which contradict nature.

Can reason judge everything, faith included?Faith and reason
Primacy of faith / the heartReason alone judges
Stated explicitly

Reason is our only light; asking us to sacrifice it to faith is asking us to blow out our candle in the forest.

Does life have a given meaning?Meaning of life
No given meaning (absurd, to be created)Objective meaning (nature, God, the Good)
Debated among scholars

The world is "a momentary order", with no purpose written in advance. Saunderson says it; our texts on what Diderot puts in its place (virtue, posterity) are not yet collected.

Are humans naturally good?Human nature
Fundamentally weak or corruptFundamentally good or perfectible
Majority interpretation

One can be born taking pleasure in doing good, and education can strengthen this inclination. It is mostly bad laws that make people wicked.

Who comes first: the individual or the community?Individual and society
Community, order, traditionIndividual liberty
Stated explicitly

No one has received from nature the right to command: legitimate power comes from the consent of the people, and it has limits.

What makes an action good?Basis of morality
Duty (deontology)Consequences (consequentialism)Character (virtue ethics)Other (divine law, relationships, value creation…)
Debated among scholars

Good is what has more advantages than drawbacks; "virtue" should become "beneficence". An ethics focused on the effects of our acts on others, close to utilitarianism, but also fed by feeling.