101101
PhilosophersGottfried Wilhelm Leibniz

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz

We live in the best of all possible worlds.

Rationalism1646 – 1716 GermanyRationalistBelieverMathematicianMetaphysical optimist
In short

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646 – 1716, Germany) : rationalism. Nothing happens without a reason: this is the principle of sufficient reason. Leibniz takes it all the way. On AskPhilosophy: 6 reconstructed arguments, 4 quotes checked word for word against the original texts, and 3 common beliefs examined; every text carries an authenticity badge (written by the author, posthumous, student notes, reported, apocryphal).

In 30 secondsNothing happens without a reason: this is the principle of sufficient reason. Leibniz takes it all the way. If everything has a reason, so does the whole world, and that reason can only be a necessary being: God. A perfectly wise and good God chose, among infinitely many possible worlds, the best one. Evil exists, but it belongs to the best possible whole. Reality is made of "monads": simple units, without parts, that perceive.
Why he matters

He invented the infinitesimal calculus at the same time as Newton, independently: our notations dx and ∫ come from him. He studied binary arithmetic and built a calculating machine. In philosophy, his question "why something rather than nothing?" and his principle of sufficient reason remain central to debates about God.

His times

A lawyer, diplomat, librarian and historian in the service of the dukes of Hanover, he wrote thousands of letters to scholars all over Europe. In Paris (1672-1676) he met Huygens, Arnauld and Malebranche; he visited Spinoza in 1676. In his lifetime he published only one book of philosophy, the Theodicy (1710), and he died almost forgotten.

His positions

click a row to see the evidence
Does God exist?God
AtheismTheism
Stated explicitly

God is the ultimate reason of things: a necessary substance, perfect in power, wisdom and goodness. He proves it in several ways, from the contingency of the world as well as from the mere idea of a necessary being.

Where does knowledge come from?Source of knowledge
Empiricism (from experience)Rationalism (from reason)
Stated explicitly

Against Locke, he defends innate ideas: the mind is not a blank tablet but veined marble, in which truths are inscribed as dispositions. Necessary truths come from the mind, even though we would never think of them without the senses.

Can we reach certain truths?Certainty
SkepticismCertainty attainable
Stated explicitly

Truths of reasoning (mathematics, logic) are necessary and can be demonstrated down to self-evident principles. Truths of fact also have a reason, even if we rarely know it fully.

Is the mind more than matter?Mind and body
MaterialismDualism
Majority interpretation

Perception cannot be explained by moving parts: it belongs to simple substances. This is not Descartes' dualism: for Leibniz everything real is made of such perceiving units, and soul and body agree through a "pre-established harmony", without acting on each other.

Are we truly free?Freedom
Determinism (no free will)Free will
Majority interpretation

Everything has a reason, so everything is determined in advance, but nothing is necessary in the logical sense: reasons "incline without necessitating". Being free means acting with understanding, from oneself, while the opposite remains possible. A compatibilist for most readers.

Do good and evil exist objectively?Status of morality
Anti-realism (morality is human-made)Moral realism (objective moral truths)
Stated explicitly

Goodness does not depend on God's mere will: if will took the place of reason, justice would be the justice of tyrants. The rules of goodness lie in the nature of things.

Can reason judge everything, faith included?Faith and reason
Primacy of faith / the heartReason alone judges
Stated explicitly

Faith and reason agree: a mystery may be above reason (we cannot comprehend it), never against it (it contradicts no certain truth).

Does life have a given meaning?Meaning of life
No given meaning (absurd, to be created)Objective meaning (nature, God, the Good)
Majority interpretation

The world is ordered to the best, and happiness is not rest: it is endless progress towards new pleasures and new perfections.

Are humans naturally good?Human nature
Fundamentally weak or corruptFundamentally good or perfectible
Majority interpretation

Creatures are limited by nature, but minds can progress endlessly in knowledge and perfection.

Who comes first: the individual or the community?Individual and society
Community, order, traditionTook no stanceIndividual liberty
Debated among scholars

He wrote a great deal on law, peace in Europe and the reunion of the Churches; these texts are not yet in our corpus.

What makes an action good?Basis of morality
Duty (deontology)Consequences (consequentialism)Character (virtue ethics)Other (divine law, relationships, value creation…)
Majority interpretation

An ethics of love and perfection: to love is to take pleasure in another's happiness; the wise person tends towards every good and does the best possible.