PhilosophersBlaise Pascal

Blaise Pascal

The heart has its reasons which reason knows nothing of.

Augustinianism · Jansenism (Port-Royal)1623 – 1662 FranceBelieverMathematicianCritic of reason aloneMoralist
In short

Blaise Pascal (1623 – 1662, France) : augustinianism and jansenism (port-royal). A brilliant mathematician, Pascal shows the limits of reason: it cannot prove its own first principles, which the heart knows. About God, reason can settle nothing; yet we must choose, and Pascal argues it is more reasonable to wager that he exists. On AskPhilosophy: 5 reconstructed arguments, 4 quotes checked word for word against the original texts, and 3 common beliefs examined; every text carries an authenticity badge (written by the author, posthumous, student notes, reported, apocryphal).

In 30 secondsA brilliant mathematician, Pascal shows the limits of reason: it cannot prove its own first principles, which the heart knows. About God, reason can settle nothing; yet we must choose, and Pascal argues it is more reasonable to wager that he exists. Man is a "thinking reed", both wretched and great.
Why he matters

He built one of the first calculating machines, laid the foundations of probability theory with Fermat and proved the existence of the vacuum. His "wager" is often seen as one of the first arguments in decision theory.

His times

After an intense religious experience in 1654, he grew close to Port-Royal, the centre of Jansenism. He prepared a defence of Christianity he never finished: the fragments found after his death became the Pensées.

His positions

click a row to see the evidence
Does God exist?God
AtheismTheism
Stated explicitly

He believes in God, but not in a God of rational proofs: for him it is the heart, not reason, that experiences God.

Where does knowledge come from?Source of knowledge
Empiricism (from experience)Rationalism (from reason)
Stated explicitly

Two sources of knowledge: reason demonstrates, the heart grasps first principles (space, time, number). Neither a pure rationalist nor an empiricist.

Can we reach certain truths?Certainty
SkepticismCertainty attainable
Stated explicitly

We cannot prove everything (against the dogmatists), yet we have an idea of truth that doubt cannot destroy (against the sceptics).

Is the mind more than matter?Mind and body
MaterialismDualism
Majority interpretation

He distinguishes three "orders": bodies, minds and charity, separated by infinite distances.

Are we truly free?Freedom
Determinism (no free will)Free will
Debated among scholars

Close to Augustine and Port-Royal on grace: the wounded human will needs grace. His Writings on Grace are not yet in our corpus.

Do good and evil exist objectively?Status of morality
Anti-realism (morality is human-made)Moral realism (objective moral truths)
Stated explicitly

Natural laws exist, but our corrupted reason no longer recognises them: hence the variety of customs.

Can reason judge everything, faith included?Faith and reason
Primacy of faith / the heartReason alone judges
Stated explicitly

Reason is good but limited: its last step is to recognise what lies beyond it.

Does life have a given meaning?Meaning of life
No given meaning (absurd, to be created)Objective meaning (nature, God, the Good)
Stated explicitly

The question of the soul's immortality should shape a whole life: indifference to it is absurd.

Are humans naturally good?Human nature
Fundamentally weak or corruptFundamentally good or perfectible
Majority interpretation

Wretchedness and greatness: man is the weakest of beings, but he thinks. His nature is wounded, his dignity real.

Who comes first: the individual or the community?Individual and society
Community, order, traditionIndividual liberty
Stated explicitly

Clear-eyed about the established order: unable to make justice strong, we made strength just. Yet he advises respecting that order to avoid worse.

What makes an action good?Basis of morality
Duty (deontology)Consequences (consequentialism)Character (virtue ethics)Other (divine law, relationships, value creation…)
Debated among scholars

Morality flows from charity and grace rather than from a system: the least movement of charity is worth more than all bodies and all minds, and true morality "makes light of morality".