PhilosophersJohn Rawls

John Rawls

A society is just if its rules would be chosen by people who did not know what place they would hold in it.

Social contractAnalytic philosophy1921 · 2002 United StatesBaltimore

Life

John Rawls (1921-2002), born in Baltimore, was an American philosopher who taught at Harvard. In A Theory of Justice (1971) he imagines people choosing the rules of their society without knowing what place they will hold in it (the 'veil of ignorance'), and draws two principles: equal liberties for all, then inequalities allowed only if they benefit the least advantaged. He renewed political philosophy and the debate on justice.

Main works

1971
A Theory of Justice

The principles of justice are those that free and equal persons would choose behind a veil of ignorance.

1993
Political Liberalism

How a society of widely differing convictions can agree on shared principles of justice.

1999
The Law of Peoples

He extends his theory to relations among peoples.

In his own words

« Justice is the first virtue of social institutions, as truth is of systems of thought. »
A Theory of Justice, §1 (1971)
« The principles of justice are chosen behind a veil of ignorance. »
A Theory of Justice, §3 (1971)
« It may be expedient but it is not just that some should have less in order that others may prosper. »
A Theory of Justice, §3 (1971)

Positions

click a row to see the evidence
What makes an action good?Basis of morality
Duty (deontology)Consequences (consequentialism)Character (virtue ethics)Other (divine law, relationships, value creation…)

Justice is a matter of fair principles and rights that cannot be sacrificed to the greater total good, against utilitarianism.

Rawls, A Theory of Justice (1971)

Do good and evil exist objectively?Status of morality
Anti-realism (morality is human-made)Moral realism (objective moral truths)
Interpretation

Principles are not discovered in a moral reality but constructed by free and equal persons choosing fairly.

Rawls, Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory (1980)

Are humans naturally good?Human nature
Fundamentally weak or corruptFundamentally good or perfectible
Interpretation

He holds that people can develop a sense of justice and that a stable, fair society is a realistic hope.

Rawls, The Law of Peoples (1999)

Who comes first: the individual or the community?Individual and society
Community, order, traditionIndividual liberty
Interpretation

Equal basic liberties come first, then fair equality of opportunity and inequalities that benefit the worst off.

Rawls, A Theory of Justice (1971)