Al-Ghazali
Reason has limits: certainty comes from experiencing God.
Misconceptions
Al-Ghazali killed science and philosophy in the Muslim world.
He attacks the philosophers' metaphysics, not the sciences. He even judges it a crime against religion to reject mathematics and astronomy (for example the explanation of eclipses) in the name of Islam. He keeps logic and uses it everywhere. Historians of science also point out that Arabic astronomy and medicine went on advancing after him; and Averroes answered him in the 12th century.
Al-Ghazali declared the philosophers unbelievers.
On three points only: the eternity of the world, the idea that God does not know particular things, and the denial of bodily resurrection. On the seventeen others he judges them mistaken, but not outside Islam. The verdict remains heavy: the question raised at the end of the book is whether those who hold these views should be declared unbelievers, and put to death; he answers that unbelief is certain on these three points.
For al-Ghazali, fire does not burn.
He says that the link between fire and burning is not necessary: it is a habit that God keeps up, and could interrupt (a miracle). He even offers a second answer, in which fire does have the nature to burn, but God can change that nature. And he states that believing in necessary natural causes is not, in his eyes, unbelief.
Al-Ghazali rejected reason in favour of blind faith.
On the contrary, he rejects belief by mere imitation of parents and teachers, and sets out in search of flawless certainty. His crisis ends when he regains confidence in the truths of reason. What he refuses is the idea that reason alone can reach everything.