PhilosophersHilary Putnam

Hilary Putnam

The same mental state can be realised by very different brains: the mind is a function, not a stuff.

Analytic philosophyPragmatism1926 · 2016 United StatesChicago

Life

Hilary Putnam (1926-2016), born in Chicago, taught mostly at Harvard. In the 1960s he proposed functionalism (a mental state is defined by its role, not by its matter), later criticising it; he then defended 'internal realism' and refused a strict split between facts and values. He matters for questions about mind, truth and machines.

Main works

1975
Mind, Language and Reality (Philosophical Papers, vol. 2)

Collected papers on meaning, reference and mind, including 'The Meaning of "Meaning"'.

1981
Reason, Truth and History

Presents internal realism: truth depends on a conceptual scheme without being arbitrary.

2002
The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy

Argues that facts and values are entangled.

In his own words

« What 'water' refers to depends on the actual nature of the paradigms, not just on what is in our heads. »
Philosophical Papers vol. 2 (1975), « Language and Reality » (1974)
« No sane person should believe that something is 'subjective' merely because it cannot be settled beyond controversy. »
The Many Faces of Realism, Lecture IV (1987)

Positions

click a row to see the evidence
Can we reach certain truths?Certainty
SkepticismCertainty attainable
Interpretation

He is a fallibilist: any belief, even in science, may be revised, yet he refuses global skepticism.

Putnam, Reason, Truth and History (1981)

Is the mind more than matter?Mind and body
MaterialismDualism
Interpretation

He proposed functionalism (the mind is what the brain does, not what it is made of), then rejected it in the late 1980s while staying non-dualist.

Putnam, Representation and Reality (1988)

Do good and evil exist objectively?Status of morality
Anti-realism (morality is human-made)Moral realism (objective moral truths)
Interpretation

He denies that facts and values are separate realms: judgments of value can be reasonable and better or worse grounded.

Putnam, The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy (2002)