Sam Harris
Neuroscientist and author: atheism, free will as illusion, a science of morality, meditation
29 videos analysed · 73 quotes checked word for word · updated 2026-10-22
Key facts
- Born in Los Angeles; BA in philosophy from Stanford, PhD in cognitive neuroscience from UCLA (2009). Wikipédia 2026 · Sam Harris
- His podcast began in September 2013 as Waking Up and was later renamed Making Sense. Wikipédia 2026 · Sam Harris
- Waking Up (2014) reached number 5 on the New York Times non-fiction best-seller list. Wikipédia 2026 · Waking Up: A Guide to…
Positions
click a row to see the evidenceA leading voice of the New Atheism. He opposes dogmatic belief and debated Rick Warren (2007) and William Lane Craig (2011) on God and morality.
- He finds a conversion to Christianity unconvincing when no reasons are given for thinking the doctrine true. Video 2025 · Why Smart People Turn to…
- He uses the problem of evil against belief in a good, all-powerful God. Article 2006 · Letter to a Christian Nation…
- Spiritual experience can be real and valuable, but it proves no religious claim. Wikipédia 2026 · Waking Up: A Guide to…
The moral argument: without God, there would be no objective right and wrong.
He calls the idea that our morality comes from Christianity "one of these shibboleths of organized religion" that needs to be retired.
The kalam argument: whatever begins to exist has a cause, so the universe has a cause, and that cause is God.
Defends : The problem of evil
He takes the hard problem of consciousness seriously: consciousness is 'the fact that the lights are on', and 'the hard problem still stays hard'. He does not say the mind is a separate substance.
In Free Will (2012) he argues that free will is an illusion: our thoughts and choices come from causes we do not control. He says this does not destroy morality.
- Neither determinism nor randomness, nor any mix of the two, gives us the free will people feel they have. Video 2021 · Final Thoughts on Free Will…
- A random act is not a free one: "there is no will in randomness". Video 2021 · Final Thoughts on Free Will…
- As the conscious witness of your inner life, you do not make decisions: you only witness them once they are made. Video 2021 · Final Thoughts on Free Will…
- He refuses to keep the illusion alive or soften the talk about it, as compatibilists do. He says morality and law do not really depend on it. Video 2021 · Final Thoughts on Free Will…
- Nobody has free will: everyone plays out causes and conditions (genes, environment, neurochemistry), and there is no will free from the universe's chain of causes. Video 2025 · Sam Harris & Dan Harris: This Is…2
Compatibilism: we are free in the sense that matters (acting on our own reasons), even if determinism is true.
He says most people think we must live with the illusion of free will or soften the talk about it, and argues that this is a mistake.
Without free will, moral responsibility and the law would collapse.
He says morality and law do not really depend on free will. He adds that giving up the belief is a direct antidote to hatred: with another life story, anyone could have been the murderer.
Criticizes : The only freedom worth wanting
He bases morality on the well-being of conscious creatures. Critics such as Kwame Anthony Appiah say this amounts to a form of utilitarianism. In 2020 he said that helping others is 'the wiser form of selfishness' if you want to be happy.
He rejects moral relativism: moral questions have better and worse answers, grounded in facts about human flourishing.
- Morality is about the well-being of conscious creatures, and there are facts about what makes lives better or worse. Wikipédia 2026 · The Moral Landscape
- If you want to be happy, helping others is "the wiser form of selfishness". Video 2020 · The Science of Happiness: A…
- He calls the idea that our morality comes from Christianity "one of these shibboleths of organized religion" that needs to be retired. Video 2025 · Should You Be Friends with an…
- We know with moral certainty that human life can be better, and the well-being of conscious creatures is the only legitimate sphere of moral concern. Video 2024 · Facts & Values: Clarifying the…2
- Like physics, morality has an intuitive version that may be wrong relative to the goal of human flourishing; so science can say that, for example, the Islamic State is really wrong about morality. Video 2024 · Facts & Values: Clarifying the…2
You cannot get an "ought" from an "is": showing what helps societies does not show what we ought to want.
He says one only has to grant that a universe where everyone suffers as much as possible for as long as possible would be bad, by any measure of bad. Every step away from it is then better, and science can study such facts about conscious experience.
Persons are ends in themselves: adding up well-being cannot justify sacrificing one person for others.
Mixed : The drowning child: helping distant people is a duty, Turning the trolley: one death rather than fiveCriticizes : Reason is the slave of the passions: morality is felt, not demonstrated
In The End of Faith he criticises belief held without evidence and judges religions by their effects on human well-being, not by their own authority. In 2021 he adds that errors in science are cured by more and better science, not by another way of knowing.
- Belief should match the evidence. For him, belief and knowledge are degrees of confidence, not two separate categories. Video 2021 · Belief & Identity: A…
- When science goes wrong, the cure is more and better science, not another way of knowing. Video 2021 · Belief & Identity: A…
- Religions should be judged by their effects on human well-being, not by their own authority. Wikipédia 2026 · Sam Harris
- Traditional approaches to meditation tend to endorse metaphysical dogmas that are very hard to justify rationally; he says he follows a third path, between dumbed-down secular apps and these traditions. Video 2022 · Why Should I Meditate? | Sam…
Believing in God without proof can be rational: for many people, belief in God is a basic belief, like trusting memory or other minds.
No sourced position yet on: Source of knowledge, Certainty, Meaning of life, Human nature.
On the big questions
Does God exist?Atheism
A leading New Atheist. In 2025 he finds a well-known atheist's conversion to Christianity unconvincing, because she gave no reasons for thinking the doctrine true.
- He finds a conversion to Christianity unconvincing when no reasons are given for thinking the doctrine true. Video 2025 · Why Smart People Turn to…
- He uses the problem of evil against belief in a good, all-powerful God. Article 2006 · Letter to a Christian Nation…
- Spiritual experience can be real and valuable, but it proves no religious claim. Wikipédia 2026 · Waking Up: A Guide to…
The moral argument: without God, there would be no objective right and wrong.
He calls the idea that our morality comes from Christianity "one of these shibboleths of organized religion" that needs to be retired.
The kalam argument: whatever begins to exist has a cause, so the universe has a cause, and that cause is God.
Defends : The problem of evil
The question on the site: all the argumentsDoes life have a meaning?A meaning to create
In 2025 he says the point of our being here is to make life worth living, then to refine it and make human happiness more beautiful.
- For him the whole point of our being here is to make life worth living, then to keep refining and safeguarding it. Video 2025 · How Should We Solve Inequality?…
- Death need not take meaning away: he says one could easily argue that the transience of things magnifies their beauty. Video 2021 · The Paradox of Death (Episode…
Are we free?No free will
Free will is an illusion, he argues in Free Will (2012) and again in 2021: neither determinism nor randomness gives us free will.
- Neither determinism nor randomness, nor any mix of the two, gives us the free will people feel they have. Video 2021 · Final Thoughts on Free Will…
- A random act is not a free one: "there is no will in randomness". Video 2021 · Final Thoughts on Free Will…
- As the conscious witness of your inner life, you do not make decisions: you only witness them once they are made. Video 2021 · Final Thoughts on Free Will…
- He refuses to keep the illusion alive or soften the talk about it, as compatibilists do. He says morality and law do not really depend on it. Video 2021 · Final Thoughts on Free Will…
- Nobody has free will: everyone plays out causes and conditions (genes, environment, neurochemistry), and there is no will free from the universe's chain of causes. Video 2025 · Sam Harris & Dan Harris: This Is…2
Compatibilism: we are free in the sense that matters (acting on our own reasons), even if determinism is true.
He says most people think we must live with the illusion of free will or soften the talk about it, and argues that this is a mistake.
Without free will, moral responsibility and the law would collapse.
He says morality and law do not really depend on free will. He adds that giving up the belief is a direct antidote to hatred: with another life story, anyone could have been the murderer.
Criticizes : The only freedom worth wanting
The question on the site: all the argumentsWhat makes something right?Consequences
Morality is about the well-being of conscious creatures.
- Morality is about the well-being of conscious creatures, and there are facts about what makes lives better or worse. Wikipédia 2026 · The Moral Landscape
- If you want to be happy, helping others is "the wiser form of selfishness". Video 2020 · The Science of Happiness: A…
- He calls the idea that our morality comes from Christianity "one of these shibboleths of organized religion" that needs to be retired. Video 2025 · Should You Be Friends with an…
- We know with moral certainty that human life can be better, and the well-being of conscious creatures is the only legitimate sphere of moral concern. Video 2024 · Facts & Values: Clarifying the…2
- Like physics, morality has an intuitive version that may be wrong relative to the goal of human flourishing; so science can say that, for example, the Islamic State is really wrong about morality. Video 2024 · Facts & Values: Clarifying the…2
You cannot get an "ought" from an "is": showing what helps societies does not show what we ought to want.
He says one only has to grant that a universe where everyone suffers as much as possible for as long as possible would be bad, by any measure of bad. Every step away from it is then better, and science can study such facts about conscious experience.
Persons are ends in themselves: adding up well-being cannot justify sacrificing one person for others.
Mixed : The drowning child: helping distant people is a duty, Turning the trolley: one death rather than fiveCriticizes : Reason is the slave of the passions: morality is felt, not demonstrated
The question on the site: all the argumentsShould we fear death?Nothing to fear
In 2021 he says one can just as easily argue that the transience of everything magnifies its beauty, rather than that death robs life of meaning.
- He says one could easily argue that it is the transience of everything that magnifies the beauty of everything. Video 2021 · The Paradox of Death (Episode…
If death is the end of experience, that finality robs life of any purpose, meaning or significance.
He rejects this religious intuition: one could just as easily argue that it is the transience of everything that magnifies its beauty.
Who am I, really?No fixed self
In Waking Up he argues that the sense of self is an illusion, which meditation can reveal. In 2022 he says that seeing this illusion is the most important thing he has learned.
- He says there is no self to begin with, and its absence can be seen directly. Video 2022 · Do You Really Have a Self? A…
- Seeing this changes experience: the insight is a "universal solvent" of psychological suffering. Video 2022 · Do You Really Have a Self? A…
- The feeling of free will is tied to the feeling of being a self; both come apart under examination. Video 2021 · Final Thoughts on Free Will…
- Mindfulness reveals the feeling of a subject facing objects, the linchpin of the self, to be illusory. Video 2021 · The Limits of Self-Knowledge: A…
- In non-dual experience there is no subject appropriating experiences, and no separable 'you' who is the seat of an ethereal freedom of will. Video 2025 · Sam Harris & Dan Harris: This Is…2
Should we believe without proof?No belief without evidence
He criticises religious belief held without evidence (The End of Faith, 2004).
- Belief should match the evidence. For him, belief and knowledge are degrees of confidence, not two separate categories. Video 2021 · Belief & Identity: A…
- When science goes wrong, the cure is more and better science, not another way of knowing. Video 2021 · Belief & Identity: A…
- Religions should be judged by their effects on human well-being, not by their own authority. Wikipédia 2026 · Sam Harris
- Traditional approaches to meditation tend to endorse metaphysical dogmas that are very hard to justify rationally; he says he follows a third path, between dumbed-down secular apps and these traditions. Video 2022 · Why Should I Meditate? | Sam…
Believing in God without proof can be rational: for many people, belief in God is a basic belief, like trusting memory or other minds.
Does history have a direction?Progress
He sees real progress, in knowledge and in how societies treat violence, but says it is not guaranteed: no law of history ensures things keep getting better, and the same power that improves life can destroy us.
- Science takes over questions that religion used to answer and never gives them back: he says no question once settled by science has returned to religion's authority. Video 2025 · Why Smart People Turn to…
- A society shows its progress when a realistic fear of violence fades for most of its members. Video 2023 · Self-Defense: Reality and…
- Progress is real but not inevitable: he agrees with Pinker that things have improved, while adding that there is no law of history that guarantees they will keep getting better. Video 2020 · Existential Risk: A Conversation…2
- The risk of self-destruction is the shadow side of progress: the technology and exchanges that improved life also made it possible to destroy ourselves, so the outcome depends on what we do. Video 2020 · Existential Risk: A Conversation…2
Progress is a storm: what looks like improvement piles up ruins behind it.
In their words
Neither determinism nor randomness, nor any combination of the two, justifies the feeling that most people have that goes by the name of free will.
There is no will in randomness.
Being able to experience the illusoriness of the self has been the most important thing I've ever learned in my life.
Consciousness is the fact that the lights are on.
3 more quotes
The facts tell us that free will is an illusion.
There's no will that's free from the universe.
The purpose of meditation is to truly wake up from the unhappy dream you call your life, not merely to lower your blood pressure.
How the ideas evolved
Click a step for details2004The End of Faith
His first book criticises religious belief. It wins the PEN/Martha Albrand Award and stays 33 weeks on the New York Times best-seller list.
2007Debates on God
He appears with Dawkins, Dennett and Hitchens in the 'Four Horsemen' discussion, and debates Rick Warren about God in Newsweek.
2010The Moral Landscape
He argues that science can in principle answer moral questions. He defends the idea that morality concerns the well-being of conscious creatures. The book follows his 2009 UCLA doctorate.
2012Free Will
A short book arguing that free will is an illusion. Daniel Dennett later replies that it attacks only the popular idea of free will.
2014Waking Up
He proposes a spirituality without religion. Its aim is to see that the sense of self is an illusion, through practices like meditation (he practises Dzogchen).
2016Warning about AI
In a TED talk he warns about the risk of building artificial intelligence without keeping control over it.
2018Waking Up app and talks with Peterson
The Waking Up meditation app launches in September. In June and July he has public conversations with Jordan Peterson on God and truth.
2020Happiness and selfishness
Talking with Laurie Santos, he says that helping others is the wiser form of selfishness. He disagrees with Daniel Kahneman, who separates the remembering self from the experiencing self.
In their words« this is a point of disagreement between me and Danny I really do think the remembering self is simply the experience himself in one of its modes »He disagrees with Daniel Kahneman: the remembering self is just a mode of the experiencing self. watch
« this is where so-called self-sacrifice becomes the wiser form of selfishness if you really just want to be happy »He says that if you want to be happy, helping others is the wiser form of selfishness. watch
2021Final thoughts on free will
He restates his case: neither determinism nor randomness gives free will, and we only witness our decisions once they are made.
In their words« the feeling of having free will is directly connected to the feeling of being a self »He ties the feeling of free will to the feeling of being a self. watch
« neither determinism nor randomness, nor any combination of the two, justifies the feeling that most people have that goes by the name of free will »Neither determinism nor randomness, nor a mix, supports the feeling of free will. watch
« There is no will in randomness. »Randomness would not give us free will: a random act would be out of character, not free. watch
2021The Paradox of Death
In a solo episode he says one can just as easily argue that the transience of everything magnifies its beauty, rather than that death robs life of meaning.
In their words« I think one could easily argue it's the treny of everything that magnifies the beauty of everything »He argues that the fleeting nature of things magnifies their beauty, so death does not rob life of meaning. watch
« if death really is the end of us if it's synonymous with the end of experience well then that finality robs life of any conceivable purpose or meaning or significance »He presents and rejects the religious intuition that death as the end of experience would make life meaningless. watch
2022The illusion of the self
With Jay Garfield he says that seeing the self is an illusion is the most important thing he has learned, and calls this insight a 'universal solvent' of psychological suffering.
In their words« being able to experience the illusoriness of the self has been the most important thing i've ever learned in my life »He says seeing that the self is an illusion is the most important thing he has learned. watch
« it is not there in the first place and it can be discovered its absence can be discovered in a way that changes the character of experience »He claims there is no self to begin with, and its absence can be directly seen. watch
« this insight into selflessness is a kind of psychologically speaking a kind of universal solvent of psychological suffering »He calls the insight into selflessness a universal solvent of psychological suffering. watch
2023Free will: rival intuitions
After a long exchange with Tim Maudlin, he says that certain rival intuitions about free will cannot be settled by argument alone; if you experience yourself in a certain way, some points cannot land.
In their words« certain rival intuitions on the topic of Free Will can't quite be resolved through argument »After a long exchange with Maudlin on free will, he concludes that rival intuitions on the topic cannot be settled by argument alone. watch
« if you experience yourself in a certain way certain points just can't land »He says that if you experience yourself in a certain way, some points about free will cannot land, and with a different experience they seem obvious. watch
2024The Moral Landscape clarified
In a solo episode he restates that we know to a moral certainty that human life can be better, and compares our intuitive morality to intuitive physics: it may be wrong.
In their words« we know to a moral certainty that human life can be better »He says we know with moral certainty that human life can be better, which grounds objective moral truths. watch
« are members of the Islamic State wrong about morality yes really wrong yeah yes can we say so from the perspective of science yes »He says science can tell us that the Islamic State is really wrong about morality. watch
« this paints an unrealistic picture of the human mind »He rejects Hume's view that moral truths can only move us when combined with some passion, calling it an unrealistic picture of the mind. watch
2025No free will, and compassion
Talking with Dan Harris, he says nobody has free will and that giving up the belief is a direct antidote to hatred: with another life story, anyone could have been the murderer.
In their words« I think being a pacifist is really just a way of outsourcing a real ethical consideration of violence to other people who are not pacifists »He argues that pacifism is a way of outsourcing the ethics of violence to others, and not a moral high ground. watch
« my position on free will I actually don't think anyone has it and I think everyone is just kind of playing out the causes and conditions »He says nobody has free will: everyone is playing out causes and conditions such as genes, environment and neurochemistry. watch
« I too could have been that person »He says that with another life story, genes and upbringing, anyone could have been a murderer, so compassion is possible even for the worst. watch
2026Consciousness and machines
He defines consciousness as the fact that the lights are on. If AIs seem conscious, he says, people will treat them as conscious, and it is easier to assume that other humans are conscious than machines.
In their words« consciousness is the fact that the lights are on. And it's synonymous with the fact of experience »He defines consciousness as the fact that the lights are on, i.e. experience. watch
« there really couldn't be a Westworld because, you know, only psychopaths could go there »If AIs seem conscious, people will treat them as conscious, so a Westworld park could not exist. watch
« it is parsimonious to assume every every one like us, you know, born Homo sapiens are are very likely conscious when they say they are »He says we can assume other humans are conscious, but it is hard to say the same of machines. watch
2026Today's language models
He says he has no concern that current language models are conscious, while he already said in 2023 that we do not know when consciousness emerges and that AIs will come to seem conscious.
In their words« there's simply no question that we have built intelligent machines and we're continuing to build them and they are intelligent »He says machines are already intelligent in the sense of competent, whether or not there is anything it is like to be them. watch
« we simply don't know you know how and when Consciousness emerges and whether it comes along for the ride at a certain level of complexity »He says we do not know how or when consciousness emerges, or whether it comes with a certain level of complexity and intelligence. watch
« at a certain point they're going to seem conscious and we're going to treat them as though they were conscious whether or not we ever know the ground truth there »He predicts that AIs will come to seem conscious and be treated as conscious, whether or not we ever know the truth. watch
The arguments 7
The site's arguments they defend or criticize, and why. Click a title to see the full argument.
In Letter to a Christian Nation (2006) he uses the problem of evil against belief in a good, all-powerful God.
He discussed Singer's drowning child thought experiment, with consequentialism and effective altruism, with David Edmonds in 2025. The page does not give his verdict.
The same 2025 episode with David Edmonds covers 'trolleyology'. The page does not give his verdict.
In 2021 he tells Anil Seth he is 'taken in more by the so-called hard problem of consciousness'. Even without zombies, 'the hard problem still stays hard'.
He uses Nagel's definition: consciousness is 'the fact that it's like something to be a system'.
Dennett defends a compatibilist free will and said Harris attacked only the popular idea. Harris answered with 'The Marionette's Lament' (2014).
In 2024 he rejects Hume's view that moral truths can only move us when joined with a passion, calling it an unrealistic picture of the human mind.
Allies and opponents
Richard DawkinsClose
One of the Four Horsemen of the New Atheism.
Christopher HitchensClose
One of the Four Horsemen of the New Atheism.
Daniel DennettSparring partner
Fellow Horseman, but they disagree on free will.
Jordan PetersonSparring partner
Public conversations in 2018 on God and truth.
Siddhartha Gautama (the Buddha)Influence
His view of the self echoes Buddhist ideas; he practises Dzogchen meditation.
William Lane CraigDisagrees
Debated whether objective morality is possible without God (2011).
Deepak ChopraDisagrees
Took part in the 2010 Nightline face-off on whether God has a future.
DDaniel KahnemanDisagrees
In 2020 he says they disagree: for him the remembering self is just a mode of the experiencing self.
Debates and big conversations
Signature ideas
A science of morality
Some lives and societies are better than others, and this depends on facts about brains and the world. So he thinks values are open to scientific study; he answers the 'is-ought' objection by arguing that well-being is the base.
Spirituality without religion
Spiritual experience is real and valuable, he says, but it does not prove any religious claim. Meditation can show that the self is an illusion.
Closest and furthest
how it is computedAmong the philosophers
Among today's voices
Take the Compass: 5 minutes to find out which philosophers you are closest to.
All sources (57)
- Publications and Lectures (debates list) samharris.org · 2018
- Sam Harris Wikipedia · 2026
- Free Will (book page) samharris.org · 2012
- Free Will (book) Wikipedia · 2026
- The Moral Landscape Wikipedia · 2026
- Waking Up: A Guide to Spirituality Without Religion Wikipedia · 2026
- Can we build AI without losing control over it? TED · 2016 *
- Jordan Peterson & Sam Harris Debate the Nature of God Thy Mind, O Man · 2018
- Nightline Face-Off: Does God Have a Future? ABC News · 2010 *
- The Philosophy of Good and Evil (Making Sense #448) Making Sense · 2025
- Letter to a Christian Nation (review) The Christian Century · 2006 *
- Final Thoughts on Free Will (Episode #241) YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2021
- Final Thoughts on Free Will (Episode #241) YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2021
- Do You Really Have a Self? A Conversation with Jay Garfield (Episode #282) YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2022
- Do You Really Have a Self? A Conversation with Jay Garfield (Episode #282) YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2022
- Consciousness and Self: A Conversation with Anil Seth (Episode #264) YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2021
- Consciousness and Self: A Conversation with Anil Seth (Episode #264) YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2021
- Michael Pollan on Consciousness, Psychedelics, and the Limits of Neuroscience YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2026
- Is AI Already Conscious? YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2026
- Why Smart People Turn to Christianity YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2025
- The Science of Happiness: A Conversation with Laurie Santos (Episode #196) YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2020
- The Science of Happiness: A Conversation with Laurie Santos (Episode #196) YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2020
- Belief & Identity: A Conversation with Jonas Kaplan (Episode #261) YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2021
- Final Thoughts on Free Will (Episode #241) YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2021
- Should You Be Friends with an AI? (Making Sense #427) YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2025
- Belief & Identity: A Conversation with Jonas Kaplan (Episode #261) YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2021
- Final Thoughts on Free Will (Episode #241) YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2021
- How Science Can Give Us Morality - Sam Harris (Within Reason) YouTube (Alex O'Connor) · 2024
- The Paradox of Death (Episode #263) YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2021
- The Limits of Self-Knowledge: A Conversation with Stephen Fleming (Episode #268) YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2021
- Why Should I Meditate? | Sam Harris YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2022
- What Do We Know About Our Minds?: A Conversation with Paul Bloom (Episode #317) YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2023
- Physics & Philosophy: A Conversation with Tim Maudlin (Episode #318) YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2023
- Facts & Values: Clarifying the Moral Landscape (Episode #364) YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2024
- Facts & Values: Clarifying the Moral Landscape (Episode #364) YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2024
- Sam Harris & Dan Harris: This Is How to Stay Calm in a Turbulent World YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2025
- Sam Harris & Dan Harris: This Is How to Stay Calm in a Turbulent World YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2025
- Sam Harris & Dan Harris: This Is How to Stay Calm in a Turbulent World YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2025
- Sam Harris & Dan Harris: This Is How to Stay Calm in a Turbulent World YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2025
- Sam Harris & Dan Harris: This Is How to Stay Calm in a Turbulent World YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2025
- How Should We Solve Inequality? Sam Harris & Rutger Bregman YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2025
- AI and the New Face of Antisemitism (Ep. 453) FULL EPISODE YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2026
- Can AI Cure Loneliness? YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2026
- Sam Harris & Dan Harris: This Is How to Stay Calm in a Turbulent World YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2025
- Facts & Values: Clarifying the Moral Landscape (Episode #364) YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2024
- Facts & Values: Clarifying the Moral Landscape (Episode #364) YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2024
- Consciousness and Self: A Conversation with Anil Seth (Episode #264) YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2021
- Do You Really Have a Self? A Conversation with Jay Garfield (Episode #282) YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2022
- Final Thoughts on Free Will (Episode #241) YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2021
- Do You Really Have a Self? A Conversation with Jay Garfield (Episode #282) YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2022
- Michael Pollan on Consciousness, Psychedelics, and the Limits of Neuroscience YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2026
- Existential Risk: A Conversation with Toby Ord (Episode #208) YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2020
- Existential Risk: A Conversation with Toby Ord (Episode #208) YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2020
- How Should We Solve Inequality? Sam Harris & Rutger Bregman YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2025
- How Should We Solve Inequality? Sam Harris & Rutger Bregman YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2025
- Why Smart People Turn to Christianity YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2025
- Self-Defense: Reality and Fantasy: A Conversation with Matt Thornton (Episode #316) YouTube (Sam Harris) · 2023