QuestionsWhat is a just society?

What is a just society?

Liberty, equality, power and the social contract

In short

What is a just society? Philosophers give 7 main answers: the contract, natural rights, liberties, equality, virtue and harmony, tradition and one humanity. AskPhilosophy presents 48 arguments, from Laozi to Robert Nozick, reconstructed step by step, logic-checked and verified word for word against their original texts.

1

The 7 possible answers

Each column is one way of answering the question: what it holds and the philosophers who defend it. Click a column to see only its arguments.

Power is legitimate only if it rests on the consent of the citizens.

Held by+1

Rousseau, Hobbes, Diderot, John Rawls…

Everyone has, by nature and before any state, rights (life, liberty, reason) that the law must respect.

Held by+1

Locke, Wollstonecraft, Francisco de Vitoria, Thomas Paine…

A just society first protects everyone's liberties and property.

Held by+7

Voltaire, Machiavel, Locke, Ibn Khaldoun…

A just society corrects the inequalities that corrupt people.

Held by+4

Marx, Beauvoir, Wollstonecraft, Gramsci…

Governing well means setting an example and letting things take their course, rather than punishing.

Held by+2

Confucius, Aristote, Platon, Lao-tseu…

A just society relies on what the experience of generations has tested (customs, institutions, cautious reform) more than on a plan drawn up by reason.

Held by

Edmund Burke, Friedrich Hayek, Michel de Montaigne, G. K. Chesterton

Before being a citizen of a country, each person is a citizen of the world.

Held by+3

Kant, Cicéron, Marc Aurèle, Érasme…

2

The arguments

Click an argument to see it step by step, with the objections and replies.

48 arguments

Liberties

A just society first protects everyone's liberties and property.

11 arguments

No one may say "believe or die": toleration

The golden rule forbids telling others "believe as I do or perish"; a belief is punishable only if it breeds fanaticism.

Voltaire18th century4 objections

Conflict between the people and the great made Rome free

The quarrels between people and elites, fought through legal channels, produced laws that protect freedom.

Machiavel16th century2 objections

Belief cannot be forced: toleration

Force can make people comply but not believe, and a religion only counts if it is truly believed.

Locke17th century3 objections

Light taxes yield more, injustice ruins the state

Light taxes encourage activity, which brings the state more; excessive taxes kill the will to work and ruin everything.

Ibn Khaldoun14th century3 objections

Freedom to think and to speak

No one can be forced to think otherwise: banning speech does not change thoughts, it only corrupts good faith.

Spinoza17th century3 objections

Power checks power

Anyone with power tends to abuse it until he meets limits, and only another power sets them.

Montesquieu18th century3 objections

The liberty of the Ancients and that of the Moderns

Today each person's share of power is tiny, so sacrificing private independence for it would cost more than it brings.

Benjamin Constant19th century3 objections

Force may be used only to prevent harm to others

When society imposes its way of life on a minority, it is as likely to be wrong as right.

John Stuart Mill19th century4 objections

Wilt Chamberlain: liberty upsets every pattern of distribution

If a distribution is just, free people spending their share as they wish produce a new distribution that is just as well.

Robert Nozick20th century3 objections

Even the majority can be tyrannical, and a gentle power can lull liberty to sleep

When the majority is the only authority, nothing stops it; and a gentle power that thinks for us takes away the habit of being free.

Alexis de Tocqueville19th century3 objections

Private vices, public benefits

The passions morality condemns put thousands to work: without them the hive grows poor; it is for the law to frame them.

Bernard Mandeville18th century3 objections

Equality

A just society corrects the inequalities that corrupt people.

9 arguments

To each according to his needs: equal right is still bourgeois right

The same measure applied to unequal people keeps the inequality: equal right does not end injustice.

Marx19th century3 objections

Man is the Subject, woman is the Other

Man posits himself as the Subject and defines woman in relation to himself; her place as the Other is imposed, not chosen.

Beauvoir20th century3 objections

The rights of half the human race

Men's rights rest on reason, which women share, and the degree of reason is not what measures rights.

Wollstonecraft18th century3 objections

Power rests on consent as much as on force

Power combines force and consent: in the West the state is only a front trench, with civil society standing behind it.

Gramsci20th century3 objections

All men are intellectuals

No work is purely physical, and outside their job everyone holds a view of the world and a conscious moral conduct.

Gramsci20th century2 objections

Property is theft

The owner draws an income from a thing without working or producing anything: he receives products in exchange for nothing.

Pierre-Joseph Proudhon19th century4 objections

Equality of what? Equalising what each person can do and be

Neither goods nor happiness measure what each person can really do and be: that is what a theory of equality should target.

Amartya Sen20th century3 objections

The natural lottery: no one deserves their talents or their starting point

No one deserves their talents or their background; so an inequality is just only if it also benefits the worst off.

John Rawls20th century3 objections

What is called the nature of women is an artificial thing

Women's nature is unknown, since they have only been seen subordinated; and if nature decides, no law is needed: competition is enough.

John Stuart Mill19th century5 objections

Other philosophers' positions arrive as profiles are completed. No position is presented as the winner.