Frank Turek
Christian apologist, author of 'I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist'; founder of CrossExamined.
13 videos analysed · 63 quotes checked word for word · updated 2026-10-18
Key facts
- Born in 1961 in New Jersey; raised Catholic, he became a Protestant during his Navy service after reading apologetics books. Wikipédia 2026 · Frank Turek - Wikipedia
- He holds a master's from George Washington University and a doctorate in ministry from Southern Evangelical Seminary. Wikipédia 2026 · Frank Turek - Wikipedia
- He hosts a call-in radio show and a TV show, both named after his best-known book. Article 2026 · Dr. Frank Turek - CrossExamined
- Legislating Morality (1998, with Norman Geisler) won a Gold Medallion award in 1999. Wikipédia 2026 · Frank Turek - Wikipedia
Positions
click a row to see the evidenceHe argues that atheists 'steal from the Christian worldview' to argue against God. In debate he says the evidence leads to a timeless, immaterial, personal, powerful and moral Creator, and that atheism needs more faith than theism. His case for Christianity rests on two points: a theistic God exists, and Jesus rose from the dead.
- The universe had a beginning (Big Bang, thermodynamics, expansion), so it needs a cause outside space and time; nothing or somebody made it, and 'somebody' is more reasonable. Video 2011 · Does God Exist? (Frank Turek vs…23
- The fine-tuning of the universe (gravity, for example) is what atheists find hardest to answer; chance would take more faith than design. Video 2018 · Debate: What Best Explains…2
- New body plans in living things need new information, which natural laws have not produced, so an intelligence is the best explanation. Video 2018 · Debate: What Best Explains…
- The moral law points to God: objective right and wrong needs a standard above us, and calling the universe unjust presupposes a standard of justice. Video 2017 · Does Evil Prove God Exists?…
- To 'I lack a belief in God' he answers that this describes a mental state, not the world, and avoids giving any argument; in the end atheism takes more faith than theism. Video 2021 · Why do you think God exists and…23
The universe is full of waste and cruelty: planets too hot or too cold, galaxies on a collision course. Who designed that?
He answers that flaws do not show there is no design, because we do not know the designer's purpose.
Evil and suffering are a problem for a good God: an all-powerful, loving God would not allow so much of it.
He says evil cannot disprove God: there is no evil without good and no good without God, and calling the universe unjust presupposes a standard of justice. He adds that the freedom to do good includes the freedom to do evil.
See 1 more objections
If God wanted us to know him, he would not hide: a loving God would make his existence plain to everyone.
He suggests that God stays somewhat hidden so that people remain free to say no, and that we know him by his effects: creation, design, the moral law and reason.
Defends : The moral law points to a lawgiver, Freedom has a price: evil does not contradict God, Whatever begins has a cause: the universe too, The fine-tuning of the universe: too perfect a coincidence?, If our reason comes from blind evolution, can we trust it?Criticizes : The problem of evil, Against miracles, The wasp that devours the caterpillar
With Norman Geisler he argues that truth is objective and that claiming 'all truth is relative' or 'there are no absolutes' refutes itself.
He says 'you are a soul with a physical body'. For him the brain is like a router that transmits a mind it does not fully produce. He argues that if we were only 'molecular machines', we could not reason.
- The mind is not the brain: the brain is like a router that transmits a mind it does not fully produce, and the mind has a non-material part, the soul. Video 2025 · Scientific Evidence for the Soul…2
- If thoughts are fixed by physics alone, why trust them? Materialism undermines reason, and so undermines atheism itself. Video 2018 · Debate: What Best Explains…2
- Neuroscience data always need interpreting, and interpretation depends on philosophical assumptions; he asks whether a person with dementia may keep a working mind despite brain damage. Video 2025 · Scientific Evidence for the Soul…2
If you damage the brain, the mind is damaged too: so the mind is simply what the brain does.
He answers that damaging a router also cuts the Wi-Fi signal, yet the router and the signal are two different things: the brain is the instrument through which the mind is transmitted, not its complete source.
He says free will requires an immaterial realm, which theism can explain and atheism cannot. He also says materialism leaves no free will and no responsibility.
- Free will requires an immaterial realm; theism can explain one, atheism cannot. Video · Is Morality Better Explained By…
- If we are only matter, there is no free will and so no responsibility. Video 2021 · Why do you think God exists and…
- He uses free will to answer the problem of evil: the freedom to do good includes the freedom to do evil. Video 2020 · Evil is a powerful argument FOR…
A soul would not solve the problem: if a spirit entity made your decisions, it would still not be you choosing. Choices in a material universe can still be real and make us accountable.
He argues that objective morality cannot be explained without God. He defines it as values that stay true whatever people think: the Nazis would still be wrong if they had won. He grants that atheists can know right from wrong; his claim is about where morality comes from, not how we know it.
- Objective morality is true and binding whatever human opinion says; it does not depend on what people agree on or how they behave. Video 2018 · Is Morality Better Explained By…2
- He grounds morality in God's nature: God neither obeys a standard above him nor invents it at will, which is how he answers the Euthyphro dilemma. Video 2018 · Is Morality Better Explained By…
- If the Nazis had won, they would still have been wrong; and if abuse is truly a great wrong, then morality is objective. Video 2022 · Atheist questions Frank about…2
- He grants that you do not need to believe in God to know right from wrong; his claim is about where morality comes from, and science cannot supply it since it presupposes it. Video 2018 · Is Morality Better Explained By…2
If right and wrong are what God commands, then anything God decreed would be moral. Morality can be known without God: ask the person who is harmed.
He answers that God's nature is the standard: God neither looks up to another standard nor invents rules at will. He is the standard, and the book has to stop somewhere.
Science and evolution can ground morality: we cooperate because society needs it, and moral values change and progress over time.
He says science cannot give morality because it presupposes it, and that evolution describes what survives, not what ought to survive. If morals change, rape may one day be considered good.
He says Christianity is 'a worldview built on reason': first you find evidence that it is true, then you trust in it. It is not blind faith.
- Christianity is built on reason and evidence, not blind faith: first you find evidence that it is true, then you trust in it. Video 2018 · Is Morality Better Explained By…
- The empty tomb after the appearances is the strongest evidence of the resurrection, since opponents could have produced the body; hallucinations are not shared by groups. Video 2025 · How to Give Evidence of the…2
- The first disciples suffered for their claim and did not expect a resurrection; they would not have invented a story that cost them everything. Video 2026 · "Heaven? No Thanks..." Atheist…23
Real people like Pilate appear in the Gospels, but that does not make the accounts true; the eyewitnesses are second-hand and people have died for other religions too.
He answers that the first disciples were not predisposed to believe in a resurrection and suffered greatly for what they saw. He adds that they witnessed an empirical event, which he says has no equivalent in Islam.
Miracles are only trivial stories told by shepherds and peasants in Bronze Age Palestine; no testimony can establish one.
He argues that if the universe began from nothing, miracles are possible; whether one actually happened is then a historical question.
No sourced position yet on: Source of knowledge, Meaning of life, Human nature.
On the big questions
Does God exist?Theism
He defends theism, and Christianity in particular, in debates, books and a weekly podcast. He calls the "I lack a belief in God" stance a cop-out.
- The universe had a beginning (Big Bang, thermodynamics, expansion), so it needs a cause outside space and time; nothing or somebody made it, and 'somebody' is more reasonable. Video 2011 · Does God Exist? (Frank Turek vs…23
- The fine-tuning of the universe (gravity, for example) is what atheists find hardest to answer; chance would take more faith than design. Video 2018 · Debate: What Best Explains…2
- New body plans in living things need new information, which natural laws have not produced, so an intelligence is the best explanation. Video 2018 · Debate: What Best Explains…
- The moral law points to God: objective right and wrong needs a standard above us, and calling the universe unjust presupposes a standard of justice. Video 2017 · Does Evil Prove God Exists?…
- To 'I lack a belief in God' he answers that this describes a mental state, not the world, and avoids giving any argument; in the end atheism takes more faith than theism. Video 2021 · Why do you think God exists and…23
The universe is full of waste and cruelty: planets too hot or too cold, galaxies on a collision course. Who designed that?
He answers that flaws do not show there is no design, because we do not know the designer's purpose.
Evil and suffering are a problem for a good God: an all-powerful, loving God would not allow so much of it.
He says evil cannot disprove God: there is no evil without good and no good without God, and calling the universe unjust presupposes a standard of justice. He adds that the freedom to do good includes the freedom to do evil.
See 1 more objections
If God wanted us to know him, he would not hide: a loving God would make his existence plain to everyone.
He suggests that God stays somewhat hidden so that people remain free to say no, and that we know him by his effects: creation, design, the moral law and reason.
Defends : The moral law points to a lawgiver, Freedom has a price: evil does not contradict God, Whatever begins has a cause: the universe too, The fine-tuning of the universe: too perfect a coincidence?, If our reason comes from blind evolution, can we trust it?Criticizes : The problem of evil, Against miracles, The wasp that devours the caterpillar
The question on the site: all the argumentsAre we free?Free will
He says free will requires an immaterial realm, which theism can explain and atheism cannot. He also says materialism leaves no free will and no responsibility.
- Free will requires an immaterial realm; theism can explain one, atheism cannot. Video · Is Morality Better Explained By…
- If we are only matter, there is no free will and so no responsibility. Video 2021 · Why do you think God exists and…
- He uses free will to answer the problem of evil: the freedom to do good includes the freedom to do evil. Video 2020 · Evil is a powerful argument FOR…
A soul would not solve the problem: if a spirit entity made your decisions, it would still not be you choosing. Choices in a material universe can still be real and make us accountable.
What makes something right?God's will
He argues that objective moral values need God.
- Objective morality is true and binding whatever human opinion says; it does not depend on what people agree on or how they behave. Video 2018 · Is Morality Better Explained By…2
- He grounds morality in God's nature: God neither obeys a standard above him nor invents it at will, which is how he answers the Euthyphro dilemma. Video 2018 · Is Morality Better Explained By…
- If the Nazis had won, they would still have been wrong; and if abuse is truly a great wrong, then morality is objective. Video 2022 · Atheist questions Frank about…2
- He grants that you do not need to believe in God to know right from wrong; his claim is about where morality comes from, and science cannot supply it since it presupposes it. Video 2018 · Is Morality Better Explained By…2
If right and wrong are what God commands, then anything God decreed would be moral. Morality can be known without God: ask the person who is harmed.
He answers that God's nature is the standard: God neither looks up to another standard nor invents rules at will. He is the standard, and the book has to stop somewhere.
Science and evolution can ground morality: we cooperate because society needs it, and moral values change and progress over time.
He says science cannot give morality because it presupposes it, and that evolution describes what survives, not what ought to survive. If morals change, rape may one day be considered good.
Is the mind the brain?The mind is not matter
He says 'you are a soul with a physical body'. For him the brain is like a router that transmits a mind it does not fully produce. He argues that if we were only 'molecular machines', we could not reason.
- The mind is not the brain: the brain is like a router that transmits a mind it does not fully produce, and the mind has a non-material part, the soul. Video 2025 · Scientific Evidence for the Soul…2
- If thoughts are fixed by physics alone, why trust them? Materialism undermines reason, and so undermines atheism itself. Video 2018 · Debate: What Best Explains…2
- Neuroscience data always need interpreting, and interpretation depends on philosophical assumptions; he asks whether a person with dementia may keep a working mind despite brain damage. Video 2025 · Scientific Evidence for the Soul…2
If you damage the brain, the mind is damaged too: so the mind is simply what the brain does.
He answers that damaging a router also cuts the Wi-Fi signal, yet the router and the signal are two different things: the brain is the instrument through which the mind is transmitted, not its complete source.
Should we believe without proof?Faith and reason agree
He says Christianity is 'a worldview built on reason': first you find evidence that it is true, then you trust in it. It is not blind faith.
- Christianity is built on reason and evidence, not blind faith: first you find evidence that it is true, then you trust in it. Video 2018 · Is Morality Better Explained By…
- The empty tomb after the appearances is the strongest evidence of the resurrection, since opponents could have produced the body; hallucinations are not shared by groups. Video 2025 · How to Give Evidence of the…2
- The first disciples suffered for their claim and did not expect a resurrection; they would not have invented a story that cost them everything. Video 2026 · "Heaven? No Thanks..." Atheist…23
Real people like Pilate appear in the Gospels, but that does not make the accounts true; the eyewitnesses are second-hand and people have died for other religions too.
He answers that the first disciples were not predisposed to believe in a resurrection and suffered greatly for what they saw. He adds that they witnessed an empirical event, which he says has no equivalent in Islam.
Miracles are only trivial stories told by shepherds and peasants in Bronze Age Palestine; no testimony can establish one.
He argues that if the universe began from nothing, miracles are possible; whether one actually happened is then a historical question.
In their words
if the universe exploded into being out of nothing then Miracles are possible because the greatest Miracle of all has already occurred
let's suppose that the Nazis had won World War two and brainwashed everybody to believe that murdering Jews was right it would still be wrong
you can't get morality from a test-tube science presupposes and uses morality
it's not a matter of the intellect it's a matter of the will it's not a matter of God's existence it's a matter of his resistance
How the ideas evolved
Click a step for details1998Legislating Morality
With Norman Geisler he publishes a book on morality; it wins a Gold Medallion Book Award in 1999.
2004I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist
His best-known book, written with Geisler, argues that atheism takes more faith than Christianity.
2006CrossExamined starts
His non-profit apologetics ministry begins, with seminars on campuses, in churches and in high schools.
2008First debate with Hitchens
On 9 September 2008, at Virginia Commonwealth University, he debates Christopher Hitchens on 'Does God exist?'. A second debate follows in 2009.
2009Second debate with Hitchens
At the College of New Jersey he debates Hitchens again, on whether atheism or theism better explains reality.
2014Stealing from God
He publishes a book arguing that atheists need God to make their case: causes, reason, information, morality and science.
2017Debate with Alex O'Connor on evil
He argues that evil does not disprove God: 'if evil exists, God exists', since evil needs a moral standard. He grants that this argument alone leads to a moral God, not yet the Christian one.
In their words« evil doesn't disprove God because there be no such thing as evil unless there was good there'd be no such thing as good unless God existed »He says evil cannot disprove God, since there is no evil without good and no good without God. watch
« my main point is is that if if evil exists God exists »His thesis: the existence of evil implies a moral standard, so God exists. watch
« a man does not call a line crooked unless he has some idea of a straight line »He quotes C.S. Lewis: calling the universe unjust presupposes a standard of justice. watch
2018Two debates with Michael Shermer
On morality, he grounds it in God's nature, which he says answers the Euthyphro dilemma. On reality, he argues that materialism makes reason impossible and that atheism takes extraordinary faith.
In their words« let's suppose that the Nazis had won World War two and brainwashed everybody to believe that murdering Jews was right it would still be wrong »He defines objective morality as values true and binding whatever human opinion says. watch
« God's nature is the standard of morality he doesn't look up at another standard he doesn't arbitrarily make things up he is the standard »He grounds morality in God's nature, which answers the Euthyphro dilemma: God neither obeys nor invents the standard. watch
« you can't get morality from a test-tube science presupposes and uses morality »He says science cannot give morality; it presupposes it. watch
2020Evil as an argument for God
On his podcast he answers the problem of evil with free will: the freedom to do good includes the freedom to do evil. He adds that only the Christian worldview explains evil.
In their words« it had a beginning if it had a beginning seems it must have had a beginner a spaceless timeless and material beginner »Among the assumptions behind the question of evil, he lists a universe that began and so needs a beginner outside space and time. watch
« God has given us the free choice to do good but also it gives us the free choice to do evil as well »He answers the problem of evil with free will: the freedom to do good includes the freedom to do evil. watch
« only the Christian worldview can explain evil only the Christian worldview can explain what's going on with regard to the the virus »He claims that evil does not refute God: atheism cannot ground moral categories, and only the Christian worldview explains evil. watch
2021Hollywood Heroes
He publishes a book on how popular movies reveal God.
2025Why God may stay hidden; the soul
He suggests God stays somewhat hidden so that people remain free to say no, and that unbelief is a matter of the will, not of the intellect. The same year he discusses scientific evidence for the soul with a neurosurgeon.
In their words« if there's a creation that's an effect we reason back to a cause a Creator if there's design that's the effect we reason back to a cause a designer »He says we know God by his effects: creation, design, the moral law and reason each point back to a cause. watch
« if there's a moral law written on the heart that's the effect we reason back to a cause a moral lawgiver »He lists the moral law among the evidence for God that divine hiddenness does not defeat. watch
« it's not a matter of the intellect it's a matter of the will it's not a matter of God's existence it's a matter of his resistance »Of people who say no evidence could convince them, he says unbelief is a matter of will, not intellect. watch
The arguments 8
The site's arguments they defend or criticize, and why. Click a title to see the full argument.
He quotes C.S. Lewis: a man does not call a line crooked unless he has an idea of a straight line. He grants that the moral argument alone leads to a moral God, not specifically the Christian one.
In a campus talk he said the Christian answer to suffering starts with free will: freedom allows love, but also evil.
In his 2008 debate with Hitchens he argued that the universe had a beginning, 'so it had a beginner'. He also argues that time cannot be infinite, or today would never have arrived.
He cites the fine-tuning of gravity (one part in 10^40) and says he does not have enough faith to believe it is chance. In 2026 he calls it the hardest argument for atheists to answer.
He argues that if we are only 'moist robots', we cannot trust our reasoning, atheism included. He reads C.S. Lewis: 'unless I believe in God, I can't believe in thought'.
He denies that evil disproves God: he says evil actually points toward God.
He says that if the universe began from nothing, miracles are possible, 'because the greatest miracle of all has already occurred'. Whether one happened is then a historical question.
He answers the argument from bad design: you cannot call a design suboptimal unless you know the purpose of the designer.
Allies and opponents
NNorman GeislerClose
Co-author of Legislating Morality (1998) and I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist (2004).
JJosh McDowellInfluence
Turek turned from Catholicism to Protestantism as a Navy officer after reading McDowell's apologetics books.
CC. S. LewisInfluence
He quotes Lewis often, on the moral law and on the limits of reason under materialism.
MMichael EgnorClose
The neurosurgeon argues with him for the non-material part of the mind (2025).
Christopher HitchensDisagrees
They debated twice, in 2008 and 2009. Turek says he likes Hitchens and agrees with him on much, 'obviously not the issue of God'.
Alex O'ConnorDisagrees
They debated whether evil proves or disproves God (2017).
MMichael ShermerDisagrees
Two debates in 2018, on morality and on theism versus atheism.
Debates and big conversations
Closest and furthest
how it is computedAmong the philosophers
Among today's voices
Take the Compass: 5 minutes to find out which philosophers you are closest to.
All sources (73)
- Frank Turek - Wikipedia Wikipedia · 2026
- Dr. Frank Turek - CrossExamined CrossExamined.org · 2026
- Books - CrossExamined CrossExamined.org · 2026
- What if atheism is not the most reasonable position after all? Impact 360 Institute · 2026
- God's existence debated at VCU The Commonwealth Times · 2008 *
- Stealing from God: Why Atheists Need God to Make Their Case Stand to Reason store · 2014 *
- Campus talk coverage (The College Fix) The College Fix · 2026 *
- Does God Exist? (Frank Turek vs Christopher Hitchens) YouTube (republication) · 2008
- Does God Exist? (Turek vs Hitchens): bad design YouTube (republication) · 2008
- Frank Turek Answers Atheist's 3 Objections to Christianity YouTube (CrossExamined) · 2013
- Does Evil Prove God Exists? (Frank Turek vs Alex O'Connor) YouTube · 2017
- Does Evil Prove God Exists? (Turek vs O'Connor): Lewis YouTube · 2017
- Is Morality Better Explained By God Or Science? (Frank Turek vs. Michael Shermer) YouTube · 2018
- Is Morality Better Explained By God Or Science? (Turek vs Shermer): Euthyphro YouTube · 2018
- Debate: What Best Explains Reality: Theism or Atheism? (Frank Turek vs Michael Shermer) YouTube · 2018
- Turek vs Shermer: fine-tuning YouTube · 2018
- Turek vs Shermer: the acorn YouTube · 2018
- Evil is a powerful argument FOR God [PODCAST] YouTube (CrossExamined) · 2020
- Evil is a powerful argument FOR God [PODCAST]: Lewis on reason YouTube (CrossExamined) · 2020
- Why do you think God exists and Christianity is true?: lack of belief YouTube · 2021
- Atheist questions Frank about morality YouTube (CrossExamined) · 2022
- [PODCAST] 3 BIG Reasons Why God May Choose to Hide Himself YouTube (CrossExamined) · 2025
- [PODCAST] 3 BIG Reasons Why God May Choose to Hide Himself: free will YouTube (CrossExamined) · 2025
- Scientific Evidence for the Soul with Neurosurgeon Dr. Michael Egnor YouTube (CrossExamined) · 2025
- Is Atheism Dead? 3 Scientific Arguments for God They Can't Explain YouTube (CrossExamined) · 2026
- Does God Exist? (Frank Turek vs Christopher Hitchens) YouTube (CrossExamined) · 2011
- Frank Turek Answers Atheist's 3 Objections to Christianity YouTube (CrossExamined) · 2013
- Debate: What Best Explains Reality: Theism or Atheism? (Frank Turek vs. Michael Shermer) YouTube (CrossExamined) · 2018
- Is Atheism Dead? 3 Scientific Arguments for God They Can’t Explain with @DrStephenMeyer YouTube (CrossExamined) · 2026
- Debate: What Best Explains Reality: Theism or Atheism? (Frank Turek vs. Michael Shermer) YouTube (CrossExamined) · 2018
- Does Evil Prove God Exists? (Frank Turek vs Alex O'Connor) YouTube (CrossExamined) · 2017
- Why do you think God exists and Christianity is true? | Paul Burtwell interviews Frank Turek YouTube (CrossExamined) · 2021
- Why do you think God exists and Christianity is true? | Paul Burtwell interviews Frank Turek YouTube (CrossExamined) · 2021
- Is Morality Better Explained By God Or Science? (Frank Turek vs. Michael Shermer) YouTube (CrossExamined) · 2018
- Atheist questions Frank about morality YouTube (CrossExamined) · 2022
- Is Morality Better Explained By God Or Science? (Frank Turek vs. Michael Shermer) YouTube (CrossExamined) · 2018
- Is Morality Better Explained By God Or Science? (Frank Turek vs. Michael Shermer) YouTube (CrossExamined) · 2018
- Scientific Evidence for the Soul with Neurosurgeon Dr. Michael Egnor @Discovery Science YouTube (CrossExamined) · 2025
- Debate: What Best Explains Reality: Theism or Atheism? (Frank Turek vs. Michael Shermer) YouTube (CrossExamined) · 2018
- Scientific Evidence for the Soul with Neurosurgeon Dr. Michael Egnor @Discovery Science YouTube (CrossExamined) · 2025
- Scientific Evidence for the Soul with Neurosurgeon Dr. Michael Egnor @Discovery Science YouTube (CrossExamined) · 2025
- Evil is a powerful argument FOR God [🎙 PODCAST] YouTube (CrossExamined) · 2020
- How to Give Evidence of the Resurrection WITHOUT Using the Bible with Allen Parr @THE BEAT by Allen Parr YouTube (CrossExamined) · 2025
- "Heaven? No Thanks..." Atheist Student Challenges Frank YouTube (CrossExamined) · 2026
- Does God Exist? (Frank Turek vs Christopher Hitchens) (at 49:20) YouTube · 2008
- Does God Exist? (Frank Turek vs Christopher Hitchens) (at 60:40) YouTube · 2008
- Is Morality Better Explained By God Or Science? (Frank Turek vs. Michael Shermer) (at 30:00) YouTube
- Is Morality Better Explained By God Or Science? (Frank Turek vs. Michael Shermer) (at 90:20) YouTube
- Does God Exist? (Frank Turek vs Christopher Hitchens) YouTube (republication) · 2008
- Debate: What Best Explains Reality: Theism or Atheism? (Frank Turek vs Michael Shermer) YouTube · 2018
- Does God Exist? (Frank Turek vs Christopher Hitchens) YouTube (republication) · 2008
- Is Morality Better Explained By God Or Science? (Frank Turek vs. Michael Shermer) YouTube · 2018
- Why do you think God exists and Christianity is true? (Paul Burtwell) YouTube · 2021
- Is Morality Better Explained By God Or Science? (Frank Turek vs. Michael Shermer) YouTube · 2018
- Why do you think God exists and Christianity is true? (Paul Burtwell) YouTube · 2021
- Evil is a powerful argument FOR God [PODCAST] YouTube (CrossExamined) · 2020
- Is Morality Better Explained By God Or Science? (Frank Turek vs. Michael Shermer) YouTube · 2018
- Is Morality Better Explained By God Or Science? (Frank Turek vs. Michael Shermer) YouTube · 2018
- Is Morality Better Explained By God Or Science? (Frank Turek vs. Michael Shermer) YouTube · 2018
- Is Morality Better Explained By God Or Science? (Frank Turek vs. Michael Shermer) YouTube · 2018
- "Heaven? No Thanks..." Atheist Student Challenges Frank YouTube (CrossExamined) · 2026
- "Heaven? No Thanks..." Atheist Student Challenges Frank YouTube (CrossExamined) · 2026
- "Heaven? No Thanks..." Atheist Student Challenges Frank YouTube (CrossExamined) · 2026
- "Heaven? No Thanks..." Atheist Student Challenges Frank YouTube (CrossExamined) · 2026
- Does God Exist? (Frank Turek vs Christopher Hitchens) YouTube (republication) · 2008
- Does Evil Prove God Exists? (Frank Turek vs Alex O'Connor) YouTube · 2017
- [PODCAST] 3 BIG Reasons Why God May Choose to Hide Himself YouTube (CrossExamined) · 2025
- Does God Exist? (Frank Turek vs Christopher Hitchens) YouTube (republication) · 2008
- Debate: What Best Explains Reality: Theism or Atheism? (Frank Turek vs Michael Shermer) YouTube · 2018
- Why do you think God exists and Christianity is true? (Paul Burtwell) YouTube · 2021
- Evil is a powerful argument FOR God [PODCAST] YouTube (CrossExamined) · 2020
- Is Atheism Dead? 3 Scientific Arguments for God They Can't Explain YouTube (CrossExamined) · 2026
- Is Morality Better Explained By God Or Science? (Turek vs Shermer): science YouTube · 2018