Trent Horn
Catholic Answers apologist; debates atheists and hosts the podcast The Counsel of Trent.
17 videos analysed · 65 quotes checked word for word · updated 2026-10-19
Key facts
- Born in 1985 in San Diego; degrees in history (Arizona State), theology (Steubenville, 2012) and philosophy (Holy Apostles, 2018). Wikipédia 2026 · Trent Horn - Wikipedia
- He has written over a dozen books, including Persuasive Pro-Life and Why We're Catholic. Article 2026 · Trent Horn - Catholic Answers…
Positions
click a row to see the evidenceIn his 2020 debate with Alex O'Connor he argued from the universe's contingency to a necessary, uncaused, timeless and immaterial cause. In a 2021 debate he summed up his case as two cosmological arguments showing a transcendent cause with divine attributes, plus a moral argument; in 2025 he describes himself as a classical theist (God is simple and timeless). He holds that reason alone can know that God exists, so some non-Christians can know him.
- The universe and everything in it could have not existed, so it needs an explanation outside itself: a necessary, uncaused, timeless and immaterial cause. He says the contingency argument is logically rigorous. Video 2020 · Debate: God's Existence, Trent…2
- Whatever begins to exist has a cause, and the universe began to exist. For him the philosophical case for a finite past is the core of the kalam argument. Physics is consistent with a beginning and is a signpost, not a proof. Video 2022 · PART 2 - REBUTTING an atheistic…2
- Moral facts are real, and only God's perfect nature can ground them. Atheism has no natural explanation for them, so one should give up atheism rather than objective morality. Video 2021 · My First Debate! "Does God…
- Human worth, even that of an infant, needs a source of value. He does not see what could give value to one biological species apart from a creator. Video 2021 · DEBATE: Does God exist? (with…2
- On evil, he replies that if we can see God has reasons for some evils, we should presume he has reasons for all. An all-powerful God can bring a greater good from any evil. If God were obvious, it would compromise our moral freedom. Video 2021 · DEBATE: Does God exist? (with…234
A perfect God could only create a perfect universe, yet the world is full of imperfection and evil, so there is no perfect creator.
He rejects the idea of a best possible world. On evil, he says that if we can see God has reasons for some evils we should presume he has reasons for all, and that an all-powerful God can bring a greater good out of any evil.
A loving God would let every honest seeker believe in him, yet some people never believe without resisting him: God is hidden.
He says an obvious God would undermine free moral choice, and that God allows mistakes in belief for the good of freely choosing him. He treats hiddenness as a special case of the problem of evil.
See 1 more objections
Hilbert's hotel does not rule out an infinite past: a real infinity can be coherent, so the universe may not have had a beginning.
He replies that the problem is applying actual infinites to the real world, not infinity in mathematics. He argues that Malpass's answer needs a mysterious force to block the paradoxes.
Defends : Sufficient reason: why something rather than nothing?, Whatever begins has a cause: the universe too, The moral law points to a lawgiver, The unmoved first mover, The fine-tuning of the universe: too perfect a coincidence?, Freedom has a price: evil does not contradict God, Where does consciousness come from? From the physical you only get the physicalMixed : If it is possible, it exists: the modal ontological argumentCriticizes : The problem of evil, Against miracles, Why would God hide?, The best of all possible worlds
He says the soul is the principle of life and the form of the body, and gives three arguments that humans have an immaterial side: abstract thought, free will, and Christ's teaching. In a debate he said that people are not just molecular machines but have immaterial aspects, which fits with evolution.
- People are not just molecular machines: they have immaterial aspects. He says this fits with evolution. Video 2021 · My First Debate! "Does God…
- He gives three arguments for an immaterial side of humans: abstract thought, free will, and Christ's teaching. Video 2020 · Do We Have Souls and Can We…
- He holds that consciousness is obvious, like free will and the passing of time: some philosophers deny it, but that does not make it less evident. Video 2021 · DEBATE: Does God exist? (with…
Mental states are brain states, as lightning is an electric discharge; there is no need for an immaterial soul.
He argues that material things just follow the laws of nature, whereas people are morally responsible for their choices, which points to something non-material guiding them. He says free will is, like consciousness, one of the obvious features of reality, and that only our own choice to reject God can keep us from salvation.
- Free will is obvious to him, like consciousness and the passing of time. He starts from this evidence rather than from a theory that denies it. Video 2021 · DEBATE: Does God exist? (with…
- Moral responsibility shows we are more than matter following laws. Video 2020 · Do We Have Souls and Can We…
- Free choice also matters for God: the only thing that could keep us from being saved is our own decision to reject him. Video 2024 · One Christian Truth Calvinists…
The brain prepares our decisions before we feel we decide, so free will is an illusion.
He defends moral realism: 'human beings discover moral truths and don't create them'. Basic moral facts are self-evident, and they reside in God's mind: God is the standard of goodness. On the Euthyphro dilemma he says God and the good are identical.
- Basic moral facts are self-evident: some things are wrong whatever a culture finds useful, and wrongness is not just disagreement with his own view. Video 2021 · My First Debate! "Does God…2
- Moral facts can only be true if immaterial facts exist and compel us; they must come from an eternal immaterial source. He says they reside in God's mind, so God is the standard of the good. Video 2021 · My First Debate! "Does God…2
- Our moral knowledge is strange without God, since it comes neither from the senses nor from pure reasoning. Video 2022 · What is the best moral argument…
- To the Euthyphro dilemma he answers that God does not command the good by will alone: God and the good are identical, since good is being and evil is its lack. Video 2022 · What is the best moral argument…2
Is something good because God commands it, or does God command it because it is good? Either answer is a problem for the theist (the Euthyphro dilemma).
He calls it a false dilemma: God and the good are identical. God commands what he does because his nature is the good, which he understands as being, with evil as its lack.
Morality has evolved: a sense of fairness and cooperation is found in other primates and in babies, so no God is needed to explain it.
He distinguishes moral knowledge from the grounding of moral facts: even if we learn morality through evolved faculties, moral facts need an eternal immaterial source. He holds that basic moral facts are self-evident, whatever a culture finds useful.
Criticizes : There are no objective values: our moral judgements are all false
He defends faith with arguments and historical evidence. In his debate with Dillahunty he said that being reasonable is not the same as being convincing: a belief can be reasonable even if others stay unconvinced. He also separates knowing something from being able to show it to others, and says Christianity is "belief in a person", not only in a proposition.
- He says the resurrection of Jesus passes his three tests for believing in an unusual event, while similar miraculous claims in other religions do not. Video 2021 · Debate: Is it reasonable to…2
- A miracle does not contradict the well-established facts about its subject: it only counts as a miracle because dead people normally stay dead. Video 2021 · #427 - Did Trent Horn admit…
- Knowing something is true is different from being able to prove it to others, and faith is trust in a person, not only assent to a proposition. Video 2021 · #427 - Did Trent Horn admit…
- Christian miracles taken together have better evidence than the miracle claims of other religions. Video 2026 · Refuting 5 Protestant Arguments…
You do not believe my ancestor could fly by flapping his arms, so why believe in a resurrection? Belief in unlikely events is unreasonable.
He answers that his test asks whether a belief contradicts well-established facts about the subject in question. That dead people tend to stay dead is what makes a resurrection a miracle in the first place, and he says the evidence for the resurrection passes his three tests while other claims do not.
No sourced position yet on: Source of knowledge, Certainty, Meaning of life, Human nature.
On the big questions
Does God exist?Theism
He argues for a necessary, personal cause of the universe.
- The universe and everything in it could have not existed, so it needs an explanation outside itself: a necessary, uncaused, timeless and immaterial cause. He says the contingency argument is logically rigorous. Video 2020 · Debate: God's Existence, Trent…2
- Whatever begins to exist has a cause, and the universe began to exist. For him the philosophical case for a finite past is the core of the kalam argument. Physics is consistent with a beginning and is a signpost, not a proof. Video 2022 · PART 2 - REBUTTING an atheistic…2
- Moral facts are real, and only God's perfect nature can ground them. Atheism has no natural explanation for them, so one should give up atheism rather than objective morality. Video 2021 · My First Debate! "Does God…
- Human worth, even that of an infant, needs a source of value. He does not see what could give value to one biological species apart from a creator. Video 2021 · DEBATE: Does God exist? (with…2
- On evil, he replies that if we can see God has reasons for some evils, we should presume he has reasons for all. An all-powerful God can bring a greater good from any evil. If God were obvious, it would compromise our moral freedom. Video 2021 · DEBATE: Does God exist? (with…234
A perfect God could only create a perfect universe, yet the world is full of imperfection and evil, so there is no perfect creator.
He rejects the idea of a best possible world. On evil, he says that if we can see God has reasons for some evils we should presume he has reasons for all, and that an all-powerful God can bring a greater good out of any evil.
A loving God would let every honest seeker believe in him, yet some people never believe without resisting him: God is hidden.
He says an obvious God would undermine free moral choice, and that God allows mistakes in belief for the good of freely choosing him. He treats hiddenness as a special case of the problem of evil.
See 1 more objections
Hilbert's hotel does not rule out an infinite past: a real infinity can be coherent, so the universe may not have had a beginning.
He replies that the problem is applying actual infinites to the real world, not infinity in mathematics. He argues that Malpass's answer needs a mysterious force to block the paradoxes.
Defends : Sufficient reason: why something rather than nothing?, Whatever begins has a cause: the universe too, The moral law points to a lawgiver, The unmoved first mover, The fine-tuning of the universe: too perfect a coincidence?, Freedom has a price: evil does not contradict God, Where does consciousness come from? From the physical you only get the physicalMixed : If it is possible, it exists: the modal ontological argumentCriticizes : The problem of evil, Against miracles, Why would God hide?, The best of all possible worlds
The question on the site: all the argumentsAre we free?Free will
Moral responsibility shows we are more than matter following laws.
- Free will is obvious to him, like consciousness and the passing of time. He starts from this evidence rather than from a theory that denies it. Video 2021 · DEBATE: Does God exist? (with…
- Moral responsibility shows we are more than matter following laws. Video 2020 · Do We Have Souls and Can We…
- Free choice also matters for God: the only thing that could keep us from being saved is our own decision to reject him. Video 2024 · One Christian Truth Calvinists…
The brain prepares our decisions before we feel we decide, so free will is an illusion.
What makes something right?God's will
He holds that objective moral facts reside in God's mind and flow from his nature, so God is the standard of the good.
- Basic moral facts are self-evident: some things are wrong whatever a culture finds useful, and wrongness is not just disagreement with his own view. Video 2021 · My First Debate! "Does God…2
- Moral facts can only be true if immaterial facts exist and compel us; they must come from an eternal immaterial source. He says they reside in God's mind, so God is the standard of the good. Video 2021 · My First Debate! "Does God…2
- Our moral knowledge is strange without God, since it comes neither from the senses nor from pure reasoning. Video 2022 · What is the best moral argument…
- To the Euthyphro dilemma he answers that God does not command the good by will alone: God and the good are identical, since good is being and evil is its lack. Video 2022 · What is the best moral argument…2
Is something good because God commands it, or does God command it because it is good? Either answer is a problem for the theist (the Euthyphro dilemma).
He calls it a false dilemma: God and the good are identical. God commands what he does because his nature is the good, which he understands as being, with evil as its lack.
Morality has evolved: a sense of fairness and cooperation is found in other primates and in babies, so no God is needed to explain it.
He distinguishes moral knowledge from the grounding of moral facts: even if we learn morality through evolved faculties, moral facts need an eternal immaterial source. He holds that basic moral facts are self-evident, whatever a culture finds useful.
Criticizes : There are no objective values: our moral judgements are all false
The question on the site: all the argumentsIs the mind the brain?The mind is not matter
The soul is immaterial and immortal.
- People are not just molecular machines: they have immaterial aspects. He says this fits with evolution. Video 2021 · My First Debate! "Does God…
- He gives three arguments for an immaterial side of humans: abstract thought, free will, and Christ's teaching. Video 2020 · Do We Have Souls and Can We…
- He holds that consciousness is obvious, like free will and the passing of time: some philosophers deny it, but that does not make it less evident. Video 2021 · DEBATE: Does God exist? (with…
Mental states are brain states, as lightning is an electric discharge; there is no need for an immaterial soul.
Should we believe without proof?Faith and reason agree
He argues that belief in the resurrection of Jesus is reasonable on historical grounds.
- He says the resurrection of Jesus passes his three tests for believing in an unusual event, while similar miraculous claims in other religions do not. Video 2021 · Debate: Is it reasonable to…2
- A miracle does not contradict the well-established facts about its subject: it only counts as a miracle because dead people normally stay dead. Video 2021 · #427 - Did Trent Horn admit…
- Knowing something is true is different from being able to prove it to others, and faith is trust in a person, not only assent to a proposition. Video 2021 · #427 - Did Trent Horn admit…
- Christian miracles taken together have better evidence than the miracle claims of other religions. Video 2026 · Refuting 5 Protestant Arguments…
You do not believe my ancestor could fly by flapping his arms, so why believe in a resurrection? Belief in unlikely events is unreasonable.
He answers that his test asks whether a belief contradicts well-established facts about the subject in question. That dead people tend to stay dead is what makes a resurrection a miracle in the first place, and he says the evidence for the resurrection passes his three tests while other claims do not.
Why is there something rather than nothing?There is a reason
He holds that the universe has a reason for existing outside itself, a necessary and timeless cause.
- Everything in the universe is contingent, so the whole needs a necessary being as its explanation, supported by the principle of sufficient reason. Video 2020 · Debate: God's Existence, Trent…
- The kalam does not depend on a big bang singularity or on quantum physics: nothing there disproves that something cannot come from nothing. Video 2022 · REBUTTING an atheistic…2
Modern physics shows that events can happen without a cause, and the Big Bang is not a proven beginning, so the causal principle of the kalam is doubtful.
He says quantum mechanics does not refute the causal principle, and that the kalam does not depend on a Big Bang singularity. He now treats physics as consistent with a finite past, not as proof of it.
Does time really exist?Time really passes
He prefers the growing block view of time: the past and present are real, and reality grows.
- He prefers the growing block view: the past and present are real and time grows like a block. This fits with relativity and with the kalam argument. Video 2022 · REBUTTING an atheistic…
- Temporal becoming, like consciousness and free will, is for him an obvious feature of reality. Video 2021 · DEBATE: Does God exist? (with…
In their words
Moral realism is the view that human beings discover moral truths and don't create them.
There is a difference between knowing something is true and being able to show that it's true to other people.
It's a fact that resides in God's mind and so God is the standard of morality.
I consider the philosophical argument for the finite past to be the main part of the kalam cosmological argument.
1 more quotes
It's not that what God commands is good or that God's commands are good, but that God and the good are identical.
How the ideas evolved
Click a step for details2002Becomes Catholic
Raised by a Jewish father and an ex-Catholic mother, and a self-described former deist, he decided to become Catholic at 17.
2012Joins Catholic Answers
After a graduate degree in theology at Franciscan University of Steubenville, he becomes a staff apologist.
2013Answering Atheism
His first book, subtitled 'How to Make the Case for God with Logic and Charity'.
2018Philosophy degree
He earns a philosophy degree from Holy Apostles College, where he is also an adjunct professor.
2019The Counsel of Trent podcast
He starts hosting his weekly podcast.
2020Debate with Alex O'Connor
A debate on God's existence on the Pints with Aquinas channel, posted on 13 August 2020.
2021Debate with Matt Dillahunty
He argues that belief in the resurrection of Jesus is reasonable (the date is inferred from a debrief dated April 2021).
2021Debate with Ben Watkins
He defends theism with two cosmological arguments and a moral argument, and answers evil, animal suffering and divine hiddenness by pointing to greater goods and the value of free choice.
In their words« the existence of a possible world where there is sentient life at all actually points back towards theism »Argues that fine-tuning for sentient life points toward theism. watch
« a perfect universe is as incoherent as a best possible world »Rejects the argument from imperfection: there is no maximally perfect or best possible world. watch
« but if we can see god has reasons for some evils why shouldn't we presume he has reasons for all of them »Answers the evidential problem of evil: if God has reasons for some evils, presume reasons for all. watch
2022The kalam: philosophy first, physics second
Answering an atheist documentary, he says physics should not be the main evidence for a beginning of the universe. For him the philosophical case against an infinite past is the core of the kalam. He also prefers the growing block view of time.
In their words« if we can accept that infinity is odd and it exists why can't we do the same for god »Replies that if counterintuitive infinity is accepted, counterintuitive divine attributes (timeless, changeless) should not be rejected for that reason. watch
« craig and other defenders of the kalam argument they have no problem with things like cantor's principle of one-to-one correspondence »Defends the kalam: the problem is applying actual infinites to reality, not infinity in mathematics. watch
« it seems like under malpass's view in order for the paradoxes to not happen there'd have to be like some kind of mysterious force »Argues Malpass's reply to Hilbert's hotel needs a mysterious force to block the paradoxes. watch
2022The Euthyphro dilemma and the moral argument
He calls the cosmological and moral arguments his favourites. Asked whether God commands things because they are good, he says morality comes from God's nature, not from his will.
In their words« my favorite arguments are probably cosmological arguments and then the moral argument »Says his favourite arguments for God are the cosmological and the moral ones. watch
« god explains all that very well atheism doesn't come anywhere close and so we should go with god on those questions »Presents the abductive moral argument: God best explains intrinsic worth, moral knowledge and responsibility. watch
« moral facts exist uh there is no natural explanation for them therefore there must be a supernatural explanation »Recalls the moral argument he gave in Answering Atheism. watch
2024Which arguments he uses
He says he does not use the ontological argument with atheists, because many see it as a semantic trick. He finds the contingency argument rigorous and is happy to present the moral argument.
In their words« personally I don't use the ontological argument when I discuss god with atheists because most people think the ontological argument is a kind of semantic trick »Does not use the ontological argument with atheists, though it can reassure those already inclined to it. watch
« I think forms of the moral argument do work and so I'm happy to present them to people who are open to that kind of argument »Thinks forms of the moral argument work and presents them to receptive people. watch
« the contingency argument for God is logically rigorous and philosophers tend to think it's among the better Arguments for God »Judges the contingency argument logically rigorous and among the better arguments for God. watch
2026God and the good are identical
Talking with an atheist, he calls the Euthyphro question a false dilemma: God and the good are the same thing. He ties good to being and evil to its loss.
In their words« I would say that it's not that what God commands is good or that God's commands are good, but that God and the good are identical »Answers the Euthyphro dilemma as a false dilemma: God and the good are identical. watch
« I think that good and evil are identical to being and that something is good when it possesses being and that it becomes evil or bad when it loses being »As a classical theist, identifies good with being and evil with its privation. watch
« the question is who can cash the biggest check to say that's normative for everyone »Says everyone needs an ultimate foundation for morality; the question is which one can make norms binding for all. watch
The arguments 13
The site's arguments they defend or criticize, and why. Click a title to see the full argument.
He argues from the contingency of the universe to a necessary cause, supported by the principle of sufficient reason. In 2024 he calls it logically rigorous and among the better arguments for God.
He describes the kalam argument as 'whatever begins to exist has a cause' and discussed it on his podcast; a review says his book gives brief statements of it. He clarifies that the premise is "everything that begins to exist has a cause", not "everything has a cause", and uses the Borde-Guth-Vilenkin theorem. In 2022 he said physics is only a signpost to a beginning and the philosophical argument is the main part.
His moral argument: if moral realism is true, then God exists. He adds that moral facts need an eternal immaterial source, and that God best explains intrinsic worth and moral knowledge.
At the end of his 2021 debate with Dillahunty he offered an argument from change for God's existence, in the Aristotelian tradition.
He argues that a possible world with sentient life points back toward theism, and explains why many find fine-tuning persuasive: it seems to have no natural explanation.
He argues that animals which feel no pain are as unfeasible as humans with no free will, so animal suffering can be justified.
He does not use the ontological argument with atheists, though it can reassure those already inclined to it.
He asks whether consciousness can persuasively point to God as its source, without a god-of-the-gaps move. He does not claim it is a proof.
He answers the problem of evil by saying suffering can be justified by greater goods. "If we can see God has reasons for some evils, why shouldn't we presume he has reasons for all of them?"
He says a resurrection counts as a miracle only because dead people normally stay dead, so a miracle does not contradict the regularity it breaks. He also argues that Christian miracles are better attested than other religions' claims.
He turns Mackie's point around: if objective moral facts are real, one should give up atheism rather than morality.
He says an obvious God would compromise our moral freedom, and that God allows epistemic mistakes so that we can freely choose him.
He rejects the idea that a perfect universe is possible: "a perfect universe is as incoherent as a best possible world".
Allies and opponents
Alex O'ConnorSparring partner
They debated God's existence in 2020, discussed evil together in 2022, and met again on the resurrection. In 2026 he called O'Connor an atheist who "brings a higher level" to the debate.
Bishop Robert BarronClose
Co-author with Barron of El Misterio de Dios, a Spanish study guide.
GGavin OrtlandClose
An evangelical who, he says, agrees with him on classical theism (a simple, timeless God).
Matt DillahuntyDisagrees
They debated whether belief in the resurrection is reasonable.
RRichard CarrierDisagrees
Wikipedia lists Carrier among his debate opponents.
Debates and big conversations
Closest and furthest
how it is computedAmong the philosophers
Among today's voices
Take the Compass: 5 minutes to find out which philosophers you are closest to.
All sources (69)
- Trent Horn - Wikipedia Wikipedia · 2026
- Answering Atheism: An Interview with Trent Horn Brandon Vogt · 2013 *
- Debate: God's Existence, Trent Horn vs Alex O'Connor Catholic Answers (The Counsel of Trent) · 2020
- Do We Have Souls and Can We Prove It? Catholic Answers · 2020
- Debate: Is it reasonable to believe in the resurrection? with Matt Dillahunty Catholic Answers (The Counsel of Trent) · 2021 *
- Dialogue: Can reason prove the universe began? with Jimmy Akin Catholic Answers (The Counsel of Trent) · 2021 *
- Why they're Catholic: A review of Trent Horn, 'Why We're Catholic' The Christian Post · 2019 *
- Dialogue: Does evil disprove God? Catholic Answers (The Counsel of Trent) · 2022 *
- Trent Horn - Catholic Answers speakers Catholic Answers · 2026
- DEBATE: Does God exist? (with Ben Watkins) YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2021
- One Christian Truth Calvinists CAN'T SAY YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2024
- DEBATE: Does God exist? (with Ben Watkins) YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2021
- I Asked 50 Catholics the Best Argument for God's Existence YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2025
- Do Christians and Muslims Worship the Same God? (My Take) YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2025
- My First Debate! "Does God exist?" (Horn vs. Travis) YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2021
- DEBATE: Does God exist? (with Ben Watkins) YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2021
- My First Debate! "Does God exist?" (Horn vs. Travis) YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2021
- Talking God and Morals with the Atheist Who "Broke" Jordan Peterson YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2026
- #427 - Did Trent Horn admit Christian belief is unreasonable? (REBUTTED) YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2021
- DEBATE: Does God exist? (with Ben Watkins) YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2021
- The Weirdest Argument for God's Existence YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2024
- PART 2 - REBUTTING an atheistic documentary on the kalam argument YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2022
- PART 2 - REBUTTING an atheistic documentary on the kalam argument YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2022
- My First Debate! "Does God exist?" (Horn vs. Travis) YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2021
- DEBATE: Does God exist? (with Ben Watkins) YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2021
- Talking God and Morals with the Atheist Who "Broke" Jordan Peterson YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2024
- DEBATE: Does God exist? (with Ben Watkins) YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2021
- My First Debate! "Does God exist?" (Horn vs. Travis) YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2021
- DEBATE: Does God exist? (with Ben Watkins) YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2021
- DEBATE: Does God exist? (with Ben Watkins) YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2021
- DEBATE: Does God exist? (with Ben Watkins) YouTube · 2021
- DEBATE: Does God exist? (with Ben Watkins) YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2021
- DEBATE: Does God exist? (with Ben Watkins) YouTube · 2021
- DEBATE: Does God exist? (with Ben Watkins) YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2021
- DEBATE: Does God exist? (with Ben Watkins) YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2021
- REBUTTING an atheistic documentary on the kalam argument - Part 1 YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2022
- REBUTTING an atheistic documentary on the kalam argument - Part 1 YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2022
- REBUTTING an atheistic documentary on the kalam argument - Part 1 YouTube · 2022
- DEBATE: Does God exist? (with Ben Watkins) YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2021
- #427 - Did Trent Horn admit Christian belief is unreasonable? (REBUTTED) YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2021
- #427 - Did Trent Horn admit Christian belief is unreasonable? (REBUTTED) YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2021
- #427 - Did Trent Horn admit Christian belief is unreasonable? (REBUTTED) YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2021
- Refuting 5 Protestant Arguments Against Catholic Miracles YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2026
- #427 - Did Trent Horn admit Christian belief is unreasonable? (REBUTTED) YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2021
- What is the best moral argument for God's existence? YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2022
- Talking God and Morals with the Atheist Who "Broke" Jordan Peterson YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2026
- My First Debate! "Does God exist?" (Horn vs. Travis) YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2021
- Talking God and Morals with the Atheist Who "Broke" Jordan Peterson YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2026
- My First Debate! "Does God exist?" (Horn vs. Travis) YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2021
- What is the best moral argument for God's existence? YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2022
- Talking God and Morals with the Atheist Who "Broke" Jordan Peterson YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2026
- My First Debate! "Does God exist?" (Horn vs. Travis) YouTube · 2021
- My First Debate! "Does God exist?" (Horn vs. Travis) YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2021
- REBUTTING an atheistic documentary on the kalam argument - Part 1 YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2022
- REBUTTING an atheistic documentary on the kalam argument - Part 1 YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2022
- PART 2 - REBUTTING an atheistic documentary on the kalam argument YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2022
- PART 2 - REBUTTING an atheistic documentary on the kalam argument YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2022
- DEBATE: Does God exist? (with Ben Watkins) YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2021
- What is the best moral argument for God's existence? YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2022
- The Weirdest Argument for God's Existence YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2024
- REBUTTING an atheistic documentary on the kalam argument - Part 1 YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2022
- What is the best moral argument for God's existence? YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2022
- My First Debate! "Does God exist?" (Horn vs. Travis) YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2021
- The Argument for God Atheists Fear the Most YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2024
- DEBATE: Does God exist? (with Ben Watkins) YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2021
- The Weirdest Argument for God's Existence YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2024
- How consciousness shows God exists (with Josh Rasmussen) YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2021
- Talking God and Morals with the Atheist Who "Broke" Jordan Peterson YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2026
- I Asked 50 Catholics the Best Argument for God's Existence YouTube (The Counsel of Trent) · 2025