Matt Dillahunty
American atheist debater, long-time host of The Atheist Experience; former Baptist who asks for evidence.
18 videos analysed · 91 quotes checked word for word · updated 2026-10-18
Key facts
- He served eight years in the US Navy, then worked in software. He has no university degree. Wikipédia 2026 · Matt Dillahunty - Wikipedia
- He co-founded Iron Chariots, a wiki that answers apologetics arguments. Wikipédia 2026 · The Atheist Experience - Wikipedia
- The Atheist Experience YouTube channel had over 372,000 subscribers in June 2022. Wikipédia 2026 · The Atheist Experience - Wikipedia
Positions
click a row to see the evidenceHe is an atheist activist. He says rejecting the claim "there is a god" is not the same as claiming there is none, and that solid evidence would change his mind. In 2019 he said he had "no idea if the Christian God exists" but found the case unconvincing; in a 2021 debate he took the stronger line "no, there is not a god", like leprechauns, while keeping the burden of proof on believers.
- Believing means being convinced, and he is simply not convinced: he has seen no sound argument for a god, and says he would believe if one existed. Video 2026 · The Line, Sunday show 31 May…2
- A God who wanted to be known and cared about truth would give clear evidence, not a story passed down and altered over centuries. He had prayed as a sincere believer and got no answer. Video 2022 · Matt Dillahunty vs Adherent…2
- Billions of people believe in very different gods that exclude each other, so they cannot all be right. Belief alone is no evidence. Video 2026 · The Line, Sunday show 31 May…
- The arguments for God fall short: the kalam at most shows a cause of the universe, and having a concept of God does not make him real. Video 2019 · Does the Christian God exist?…2
- A God who sent people to hell for honestly not being convinced would be a moral monster; for that kind of God, he says, he is convinced none exists. Video 2019 · Is Belief in the Resurrection…2
The universe began to exist, so it needs a cause, and that cause looks like God.
He answers that the kalam argument is not an argument for God: God is neither a premise nor the conclusion. He adds that we do not know enough to say how the universe began.
The universe looks fine-tuned for life, which fits a perfect mind better than chance.
He doubts that an imperfect human mind can judge that this is more likely with a perfect mind than without one.
See 1 more objections
Deep down you already know God exists; you simply refuse to believe.
He answers that belief is not a choice, and that if God exists, God is the one who chose a universe in which he is not a believer.
Defends : Against miracles, Why would God hide?, Eternal punishment for the faults of one life: the problem of hell, If God knows everything in advance, am I free?, Religions contradict each other: why believe your own?Criticizes : Whatever begins has a cause: the universe too, The fine-tuning of the universe: too perfect a coincidence?, Freedom has a price: evil does not contradict God, That than which nothing greater can be conceived exists, The moral law points to a lawgiver
He rejects absolute certainty and says all knowledge is probabilistic: a level of confidence on which we act.
- Knowledge is a level of confidence proportioned to the evidence, not certainty; we act on it while staying open to being wrong. Video 2021 · Does God Exist? Matt Dillahunty…
Logic and knowledge only make sense if God grounds them, so an atheist cannot explain how he knows anything.
He answers that these are presuppositions, which are not justified by definition, and says he is only not convinced that God exists. For him knowledge is what would change your worldview if you found out you were wrong.
He says there is no evidence for a soul and good evidence against it. In 2026 he called the soul one of the most obviously false ideas in religion, while staying open to proof.
- There is no evidence for a soul, and good evidence against it. Video 2013 · Does God Exist? Matt Dillahunty…
- He calls the soul one of the most obviously false ideas in religion, while staying open to proof. Video 2026 · The Line, Sunday show 31 May…
Consciousness cannot be explained by physical processes alone: why does brain activity feel like anything?
You cannot prove there is no soul, so you should stay neutral.
He calls the soul one of the most obviously false ideas in religion, but says he is open to someone proving it.
He says he is a compatibilist: "I don't accept that we have anything like libertarian free will".
- He is a compatibilist and does not accept libertarian free will, which sits badly with classical theism and prophecy. Video 2019 · Does the Christian God exist?…
If our choices are fully determined, no one is really free and no one is responsible.
In a 2013 lecture he said morality is derived from empathy, fairness and cooperation, together with facts about living in this universe. In 2021 he put it simply: "I define morality as the well-being of thinking creatures", and actions are judged by their effects on that goal. He calls infinite punishment for finite deeds "morally inferior".
On 31 May 2026 he said he had recently changed his mind and now holds that morality has an objective foundation: "I do now adhere to objective morality". He added that his earlier attempt to solve the is-ought problem had made a mistake, and that a video explaining his new view was coming. The details are not yet public.
2021 Until at least 2021 he denied that moral laws exist apart from minds. He compared morality to chess: the rules are made up, but once chosen, actions can objectively be against them. Video 2021 · Does God Exist? Matt Dillahunty…
- He defines morality as the well-being of thinking creatures, and judges actions by their effects on that goal. Video 2021 · Does God Exist? Matt Dillahunty…
- No god is needed: we discover truths about how actions help or harm beings in this universe. Video 2013 · Does God Exist? Matt Dillahunty…
- Against the moral argument, he says nobody has shown an objective, universal moral law; he used to compare morality to chess, where the rules are made up but moves can still be judged against them. Video 2021 · Does God Exist? Matt Dillahunty…2
- In 2026 he said his earlier attempt to solve the is-ought problem contained a mistake, which led him to hold an objective foundation; the full reasons are not yet public. Video 2026 · The Line, Sunday show 31 May…2
Without God there is no objective moral law, so atheists cannot say anything is truly good or evil.
In 2021 he answered that nobody has shown an objective, universal moral law, and compared morality to chess: the rules are made up, yet a move can still objectively break them. In 2026 he said he now holds an objective foundation for morality.
Why should well-being be the goal? That starting point is arbitrary.
He compares morality to chess: the rules are ultimately arbitrary, but it is still objectively against the rules to move wrongly. He defines morality as the well-being of thinking creatures.
Defends : The Euthyphro dilemma
Religious claims should be judged by the same standards as any other claim, and each claim has its own bar of evidence. In 2019 he defined faith as "the excuse people give for believing something when they don't have a good reason". He says he wants to believe as many true things and as few false ones as possible.
- Faith is the excuse for believing without a good reason: with a good reason, you would just state it. Video 2019 · Does the Christian God exist?…
- Each claim needs its own level of evidence, and what is asserted without evidence can be rejected without evidence. Article · Matt Dillahunty (Open Doubt)2
- He wants to believe as many true things and as few false things as possible, and says only reason and evidence can correct him. Video 2019 · Does the Christian God exist?…2
- On the resurrection he applies Hume: the testimony of sincere people does not outweigh the greater miracle, and willingness to die shows sincerity, not truth. Video 2021 · Is belief in the Resurrection…2
The first disciples were willing to die for their claim that Jesus rose, so it must be true.
He answers that being willing to die for something shows sincerity, not that it is true.
You cannot say what evidence would convince you of a resurrection, so your standard is unfair.
He answers that not being able to say what would establish a resurrection is not a flaw in his method but a problem for the resurrection claim.
See 1 more objections
Everyone needs starting assumptions to reason at all, so demanding evidence for every belief is itself a faith.
He answers that presuppositions are by definition not justified, and that saying we do not need a justification is a way to hide that there is none.
He said he would not want his purpose handed to him by something outside himself, and that he sees no rational reason to think God has a plan. In 2013 he said we can give our lives whatever meaning and purpose we want; in 2021 he added that not every atheist agrees.
- Without God there is no ultimate meaning, but we can give our lives whatever meaning and purpose we want. Article · Pub talk with an atheist and an…
- He would not want a purpose imposed from outside: he says he needs no externally imposed purpose or meaning from a god. Video 2013 · Does God Exist? Matt Dillahunty…2
A meaning you give yourself is not real meaning; without God, life is empty.
He accepts that there is no ultimate meaning without God, but says he can give his life whatever meaning and purpose he wants.
Only a purpose given by God can fulfil us.
He says he would not want a purpose imposed from outside: he needs no externally imposed purpose or meaning from a god.
No sourced position yet on: Source of knowledge, Human nature.
On the big questions
Does God exist?Atheism
Raised Baptist, he rejected Christianity and then all religion.
- Believing means being convinced, and he is simply not convinced: he has seen no sound argument for a god, and says he would believe if one existed. Video 2026 · The Line, Sunday show 31 May…2
- A God who wanted to be known and cared about truth would give clear evidence, not a story passed down and altered over centuries. He had prayed as a sincere believer and got no answer. Video 2022 · Matt Dillahunty vs Adherent…2
- Billions of people believe in very different gods that exclude each other, so they cannot all be right. Belief alone is no evidence. Video 2026 · The Line, Sunday show 31 May…
- The arguments for God fall short: the kalam at most shows a cause of the universe, and having a concept of God does not make him real. Video 2019 · Does the Christian God exist?…2
- A God who sent people to hell for honestly not being convinced would be a moral monster; for that kind of God, he says, he is convinced none exists. Video 2019 · Is Belief in the Resurrection…2
The universe began to exist, so it needs a cause, and that cause looks like God.
He answers that the kalam argument is not an argument for God: God is neither a premise nor the conclusion. He adds that we do not know enough to say how the universe began.
The universe looks fine-tuned for life, which fits a perfect mind better than chance.
He doubts that an imperfect human mind can judge that this is more likely with a perfect mind than without one.
See 1 more objections
Deep down you already know God exists; you simply refuse to believe.
He answers that belief is not a choice, and that if God exists, God is the one who chose a universe in which he is not a believer.
Defends : Against miracles, Why would God hide?, Eternal punishment for the faults of one life: the problem of hell, If God knows everything in advance, am I free?, Religions contradict each other: why believe your own?Criticizes : Whatever begins has a cause: the universe too, The fine-tuning of the universe: too perfect a coincidence?, Freedom has a price: evil does not contradict God, That than which nothing greater can be conceived exists, The moral law points to a lawgiver
The question on the site: all the argumentsDoes life have a meaning?A meaning to create
He prefers a purpose that comes from himself rather than from a divine plan.
- Without God there is no ultimate meaning, but we can give our lives whatever meaning and purpose we want. Article · Pub talk with an atheist and an…
- He would not want a purpose imposed from outside: he says he needs no externally imposed purpose or meaning from a god. Video 2013 · Does God Exist? Matt Dillahunty…2
A meaning you give yourself is not real meaning; without God, life is empty.
He accepts that there is no ultimate meaning without God, but says he can give his life whatever meaning and purpose he wants.
Only a purpose given by God can fulfil us.
He says he would not want a purpose imposed from outside: he needs no externally imposed purpose or meaning from a god.
Are we free?Free without absolute free will
He calls himself a compatibilist and rejects libertarian free will.
- He is a compatibilist and does not accept libertarian free will, which sits badly with classical theism and prophecy. Video 2019 · Does the Christian God exist?…
If our choices are fully determined, no one is really free and no one is responsible.
Can we be certain of anything?Through experience, with care
No absolute certainty: all knowledge is a level of confidence proportioned to the evidence.
- Knowledge is a level of confidence proportioned to the evidence, not certainty; we act on it while staying open to being wrong. Video 2021 · Does God Exist? Matt Dillahunty…
Logic and knowledge only make sense if God grounds them, so an atheist cannot explain how he knows anything.
He answers that these are presuppositions, which are not justified by definition, and says he is only not convinced that God exists. For him knowledge is what would change your worldview if you found out you were wrong.
What makes something right?Consequences
He defines morality by the well-being of thinking creatures. In 2026 he said he now holds an objective foundation for it, without yet giving details.
- He defines morality as the well-being of thinking creatures, and judges actions by their effects on that goal. Video 2021 · Does God Exist? Matt Dillahunty…
- No god is needed: we discover truths about how actions help or harm beings in this universe. Video 2013 · Does God Exist? Matt Dillahunty…
- Against the moral argument, he says nobody has shown an objective, universal moral law; he used to compare morality to chess, where the rules are made up but moves can still be judged against them. Video 2021 · Does God Exist? Matt Dillahunty…2
- In 2026 he said his earlier attempt to solve the is-ought problem contained a mistake, which led him to hold an objective foundation; the full reasons are not yet public. Video 2026 · The Line, Sunday show 31 May…2
Without God there is no objective moral law, so atheists cannot say anything is truly good or evil.
In 2021 he answered that nobody has shown an objective, universal moral law, and compared morality to chess: the rules are made up, yet a move can still objectively break them. In 2026 he said he now holds an objective foundation for morality.
Why should well-being be the goal? That starting point is arbitrary.
He compares morality to chess: the rules are ultimately arbitrary, but it is still objectively against the rules to move wrongly. He defines morality as the well-being of thinking creatures.
Defends : The Euthyphro dilemma
The question on the site: all the argumentsIs the mind the brain?The mind comes from matter
He sees no evidence for a soul and good evidence against it.
- There is no evidence for a soul, and good evidence against it. Video 2013 · Does God Exist? Matt Dillahunty…
- He calls the soul one of the most obviously false ideas in religion, while staying open to proof. Video 2026 · The Line, Sunday show 31 May…
Consciousness cannot be explained by physical processes alone: why does brain activity feel like anything?
You cannot prove there is no soul, so you should stay neutral.
He calls the soul one of the most obviously false ideas in religion, but says he is open to someone proving it.
Should we fear death?Nothing to fear
He does not know whether there is an afterlife but is fairly sure there is none.
- Wishing for an afterlife, or loving someone, is evidence of desire, not of an afterlife; there is no good evidence for one. Video 2013 · Does God Exist? Matt Dillahunty…
Everyone longs for life after death; such a universal desire suggests it is real.
He answers that this is evidence of desire, not of an afterlife, and that there is no good evidence for an afterlife.
Should we believe without proof?No belief without evidence
He asks that claims about gods rest on evidence, and says solid evidence is all it would take to make him believe.
- Faith is the excuse for believing without a good reason: with a good reason, you would just state it. Video 2019 · Does the Christian God exist?…
- Each claim needs its own level of evidence, and what is asserted without evidence can be rejected without evidence. Article · Matt Dillahunty (Open Doubt)2
- He wants to believe as many true things and as few false things as possible, and says only reason and evidence can correct him. Video 2019 · Does the Christian God exist?…2
- On the resurrection he applies Hume: the testimony of sincere people does not outweigh the greater miracle, and willingness to die shows sincerity, not truth. Video 2021 · Is belief in the Resurrection…2
The first disciples were willing to die for their claim that Jesus rose, so it must be true.
He answers that being willing to die for something shows sincerity, not that it is true.
You cannot say what evidence would convince you of a resurrection, so your standard is unfair.
He answers that not being able to say what would establish a resurrection is not a flaw in his method but a problem for the resurrection claim.
See 1 more objections
Everyone needs starting assumptions to reason at all, so demanding evidence for every belief is itself a faith.
He answers that presuppositions are by definition not justified, and that saying we do not need a justification is a way to hide that there is none.
In their words
I didn't have good reasons for my Christian beliefs.
faith is the excuse people give for believing something when they don't have a good reason because if you have a good reason you just state the reason
That's all it would take for me to believe—solid evidence.
If there was a sound argument for the existence of God, I'd believe in a God
1 more quotes
I do now adhere to objective morality
How the ideas evolved
Click a step for details2005Joins The Atheist Experience
He first co-presents the Austin call-in show in March 2005. Callers bring arguments such as the kalam, the anthropic principle and moral arguments.
2006President of the Atheist Community of Austin
He leads the group that makes the show until 2013.
2013Debate with Cliffe Knechtle: does God exist?
He answers a string of apologetic arguments with the rule that what can be asserted without evidence can be rejected without evidence. He says we can give our lives meaning ourselves and that morality needs no god.
In their words« that which can be asserted without evidence can be rejected without evidence »Answering a string of apologetic arguments, he borrows Hitchens' razor and refers to the Iron Chariots wiki for the replies. watch
« we don't need some Transcendent mind to dictate what is true we discover what is true about the reality that we inhabit »He says morality rests on discoverable truths about how actions help or harm beings in a physical universe, with no need for a god. watch
« there's no evidence for a soul in fact there's good evidence against it »He says there is no evidence for a soul and good evidence against it. watch
2016Resurrection debate with Blake Giunta
He argues that the willingness of early believers to die proves sincerity, not truth. He says a God who left a sincere believer without answer to his prayers is not one he wants anything to do with.
In their words« I'm entirely within the realm of my rights and so as anyone else with regard to reason to say these are not the most reliable sources »He says he cannot call the resurrection false, but he may reasonably say the sources are not reliable enough to establish it. watch
« the fact that they were willing to die for something doesn't tell you anything at all about whether or not what they were willing to die for is true »He says that willingness to die for a belief says nothing about whether the belief is true. watch
« it is an argument from ignorance fallacy it is simply saying that because we don't have a naturalistic explanation we can then be warranted in accepting a supernatural explanation »He calls the step from 'no natural explanation' to 'a supernatural one' an argument from ignorance. watch
2017On tour with Harris, Dawkins and Krauss
He tours with Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins and Lawrence Krauss for the Secular Student Alliance.
2018Making Sense live, and a talk on religion and values
In January he joins Harris and Krauss on stage in New York to discuss, among other things, a universal conception of morality and free will. In 2018 he also discusses religion and values with Jordan Peterson.
2021Debates Michael Egnor, and Trent Horn on the resurrection
Against Egnor he says there is no god, as there are no leprechauns, and compares morality to chess. Against Horn he applies Hume's rule on miracles.
In their words« It has no bearing on whether or not it's actually true »He says that being willing to die for a belief shows sincerity, not truth. watch
« You shouldn't take my word for anything »Asked why we should trust his claims, he tells the audience not to take his word and to follow the evidence. watch
« I thought hey when I read the Bible I'm reading um reliable accounts that are necessarily accurate because there's a God who's preserved the word »He recalls that as a Southern Baptist he assumed the Bible was accurate because God had preserved it, until he saw otherwise. watch
2022Leaves The Atheist Experience
On 2 October he announces his last episode as host, after 17 years. He moves to The Line, a YouTube channel on religious debates.
2025Debate: can atheism deliver a better world?
With Glen Scrivener he discusses secular humanism and the foundations of morality. He argues for keeping the best ideas and leaving the "baggage" of religion.
2026 Change of mindSays he now holds that morality is objective
On 31 May, on The Line, he says he recently changed his mind and now adheres to objective morality. He says his old attempt to solve the is-ought problem was a mistake. A video explaining the new view was due.
In their words« you're basically claiming that you've detected a god. How did you do that? And how can we do it? »He says only gods people claim to detect are worth discussing, and asks believers how they detected theirs. watch
« I also find it interesting that seemingly none of them believe in exactly the same god »Asked why billions believe in a god, he replies that they believe in wildly different, mutually exclusive gods, so they cannot all be right. watch
« If there was a sound argument for the existence of God, I'd believe in a God »He says he has not met a sound argument for God, but would believe if one existed; he refuses to claim there is no evidence at all. watch
The arguments 11
The site's arguments they defend or criticize, and why. Click a title to see the full argument.
He uses the Euthyphro dilemma against divine command theory: is something good because God says so, or does God say it because it is good?
He applies "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" to the resurrection, and Hume's weighing of miracles against error or deception.
If a morally good God wanted people to know him, he says, he should provide compelling evidence and show what he expects.
A God who sends people to hell for honestly not being convinced would be "a moral monster".
If God knew everything and could have made a world where he stayed a believer, God is responsible for the world where he is not.
Asked why billions believe in a god, he replies that they believe in different, mutually exclusive gods, so they cannot all be right.
In a 2022 video he granted the premises but said the argument never mentions God and does not show the cause is a mind. He called it "deader than a dead thing" as a proof of God.
In a debate he disputed the probability reasoning behind fine-tuning (reported by a critical blog).
Against the free-will reply to evil, he says an all-powerful God who wanted to end evil would already have done it.
Against the idea that understanding the word God proves God, he says having a concept is not the same as the thing being real.
Against the moral argument, he says no one has shown an objective, universal moral law.
Allies and opponents
David HumeInfluence
He says his closest motto is to believe as many true things and as few false things as possible, inspired by David Hume.
Sam HarrisClose
They toured together in 2017 and shared a stage in 2018.
Richard DawkinsClose
Toured with him in 2017.
Lawrence KraussClose
Toured with him in 2017 and shared the 2018 Making Sense stage.
Jordan PetersonDisagrees
They discussed religion and values in 2018.
Cliffe KnechtleDisagrees
They debated in 2013 (does God exist?) and 2023 (is Christianity true?).
Trent HornDisagrees
They debated in 2021 whether belief in the resurrection is reasonable.
Debates and big conversations
Closest and furthest
how it is computedAmong the philosophers
Among today's voices
Take the Compass: 5 minutes to find out which philosophers you are closest to.
All sources (49)
- Pub talk with an atheist and an Anglican Eternity News *
- The End of the Kalam Cosmological Argument? Reasonable Faith · 2022
- Matt Dillahunty's Bad Arguments Bentham's Newsletter *
- Matt Dillahunty - Wikipedia Wikipedia · 2026
- The Atheist Experience - Wikipedia Wikipedia · 2026
- How Matt Dillahunty's Journey as Host of The Atheist Experience Shaped Online Atheist Activism In-Sight Publishing · 2025
- Matt Dillahunty (Open Doubt) Open Doubt
- Morality Debate, Part 1 (UMBC debate on the origin of human morality) ooblick.com *
- Making Sense #115: Sam Harris, Lawrence Krauss and Matt Dillahunty Sam Harris (Substack) · 2018
- Classic: Can atheism deliver a better world? Matt Dillahunty vs Glen Scrivener Premier Unbelievable? · 2025
- Does God Exist? Matt Dillahunty vs. Cliffe Knechtle YouTube · 2013
- Does God Exist? Matt Dillahunty vs. Cliffe Knechtle (morality, the soul) YouTube · 2013
- Does the Christian God exist? Matt Dillahunty vs Braxton Hunter (free will, kalam) YouTube · 2019
- Does the Christian God exist? Matt Dillahunty vs Braxton Hunter (true beliefs) YouTube · 2019
- Is belief in the Resurrection reasonable? Trent Horn vs Matt Dillahunty YouTube · 2021
- Does God Exist? Matt Dillahunty vs Michael Egnor YouTube · 2021
- Does God Exist? Matt Dillahunty vs Michael Egnor (the chess comparison) YouTube · 2021
- The Line, Sunday show 31 May 2026 (a sound argument) YouTube · 2026
- The Line, Sunday show 31 May 2026 (objective morality) YouTube · 2026
- Atheist Debates - Theism via Transcendental Arguments - Matt Dillahunty and Jay Dyer (presuppositions) YouTube · 2019
- Atheist Debates - Theism via Transcendental Arguments - Matt Dillahunty and Jay Dyer (what knowledge is) YouTube · 2019
- Does the Christian God exist? Matt Dillahunty vs Braxton Hunter (unconvinced) YouTube · 2019
- Does the Christian God exist? Matt Dillahunty vs Braxton Hunter (what faith is) YouTube · 2019
- Does the Christian God exist? Matt Dillahunty vs Braxton Hunter (free will, kalam) YouTube · 2019
- Does God Exist? Matt Dillahunty vs. Cliffe Knechtle YouTube · 2013
- Does God Exist? Matt Dillahunty vs. Cliffe Knechtle YouTube · 2013
- Does God Exist? Matt Dillahunty vs Michael Egnor (the chess comparison) YouTube · 2021
- Does God Exist? Matt Dillahunty vs Michael Egnor (morality) YouTube · 2021
- Does God Exist? Matt Dillahunty vs Michael Egnor (certainty) YouTube · 2021
- The Line, Sunday show 31 May 2026 (changed mind on morality) YouTube · 2026
- The Line, Sunday show 31 May 2026 (afterlife and soul) YouTube · 2026
- The Line, Sunday show 31 May 2026 (a sound argument) YouTube · 2026
- The Line, Sunday show 31 May 2026 (a sound argument) YouTube · 2026
- Matt Dillahunty vs Adherent Apologetics: Did a Perfect Mind Create the Universe? YouTube · 2022
- Matt Dillahunty vs Adherent Apologetics: Did a Perfect Mind Create the Universe? YouTube · 2022
- Did Jesus Rise From The Dead? Matt Dillahunty vs Blake Giunta YouTube · 2016
- Did Jesus Rise From The Dead? Matt Dillahunty vs Blake Giunta YouTube · 2016
- Did Jesus Rise From The Dead? Matt Dillahunty vs Blake Giunta YouTube · 2016
- Did Jesus Rise From The Dead? Matt Dillahunty vs Blake Giunta YouTube · 2016
- The Line, Sunday show 31 May 2026 (many gods) YouTube · 2026
- Christian YouTuber calls The Atheist Experience (presuppositionalist caller) YouTube · 2023
- Is Belief in the Resurrection Unreasonable? Mike Winger vs. Matt Dillahunty (hell) YouTube · 2019
- Is Belief in the Resurrection Unreasonable? Mike Winger vs. Matt Dillahunty YouTube · 2019
- Is Belief in the Resurrection Unreasonable? Mike Winger vs. Matt Dillahunty YouTube · 2019
- Ray Comfort vs Matt Dillahunty: Does God Exist? YouTube · 2020
- Is belief in the Resurrection reasonable? Trent Horn vs Matt Dillahunty YouTube · 2021
- Does God Exist? Matt Dillahunty vs. Cliffe Knechtle (morality, the soul) YouTube · 2013
- Does God Exist? Matt Dillahunty vs. Cliffe Knechtle (afterlife) YouTube · 2013
- Does God Exist? Matt Dillahunty vs. Cliffe Knechtle (afterlife) YouTube · 2013