John Lennox
Oxford mathematician who argues that science and belief in God fit together; debated Dawkins and Hitchens.
18 videos analysed · 97 quotes checked word for word · updated 2026-10-18
Key facts
- Emeritus professor of mathematics at Oxford, specialist in group theory, with over 70 peer-reviewed articles. Wikipédia 2026 · John Lennox
- President of the Oxford Centre for Christian Apologetics (OCCA). Wikipédia 2026 · John Lennox
- He spent 29 years as a mathematician at Cardiff (University of Wales), holds a Cardiff DSc (1993), and received the VIZE 97 Prize in 2023. Wikipédia 2026 · John Lennox
Positions
click a row to see the evidenceHe is a Christian apologist. His books and debates (God's Undertaker, Gunning for God) defend belief in a personal God, and he says the God explanation and the science explanation are different kinds of explanation. In debates he describes God as a person, not just a force, and says science can bury atheism, not God, because science can be done at all. He says his main reason for not being an atheist is that he can do science, and that without God there is no ultimate justice or hope.
- Reason can be trusted only if a rational mind is behind the universe. If our minds come from mindless, unguided processes, we have no ground to trust them, and that includes the reasoning of atheists. Video 2011 · Peter Singer vs John Lennox | Is…23
- Science itself points to God: the fact that the universe is rationally intelligible and that science can be done makes sense if a rational intelligence is behind it. He says it is unreasonable only if you start from atheism. Video 2025 · Why Science Buries Atheism, Not…2
- The Christian message rests on a historical event: Christ died and rose. He says it is the resurrection that launched Christianity, and that Christ's claim is either absurd or true. Video 2008 · Richard Dawkins vs John Lennox |…23
- To the objection 'Who created God?', he answers that the question assumes God is a created being. The God he believes in is uncreated, and the atheist must also stop at something (mass-energy or the universe). Video 2013 · Is God Relevant? Oxford…23
- On evil and suffering, he admits there is no complete answer. He finds enough reason to trust God in the cross, where God took part in human suffering. Video 2011 · Peter Singer vs John Lennox | Is…2
If everything needs a creator, who created God? A designer would be even more complex than what he designed.
He answers that the question assumes God is a created being, while the God he believes in is uncreated. He asks in turn who created the universe, since the atheist must also stop at something.
The universe is vast and humans are a speck of dust: would its creator really choose to have himself tortured to forgive sins on one small planet?
He says size is not the measure of importance, and that if Jesus really rose from the dead as a matter of history, it matters hugely. He adds that this is a moral universe, where simply forgiving would not make sense.
See 1 more objections
There is too much suffering in the world for a good and powerful God.
He admits he has no complete answer, calling it the hardest problem. He finds reason to trust God in the cross, where God took part in human suffering, and says God will bring justice.
Defends : The moral law points to a lawgiver, The fine-tuning of the universe: too perfect a coincidence?, If our reason comes from blind evolution, can we trust it?, The watch and the eye, Sufficient reason: why something rather than nothing?Mixed : The problem of evilCriticizes : Against miracles, Who designed the designer?, Religion, an illusion born of wishes
He says nobody knows what consciousness is and calls it something fundamental, and he doubts that AI is conscious. He also argues that if reasoning were only a by-product of blind forces, we could not trust it. He does not say 'dualism' in these sources. On AI he says the Turing test is not enough to establish consciousness, and finds Penrose's argument persuasive: the mind can do things algorithms cannot.
- He thinks the human mind can do non-algorithmic things (Penrose, Gödel), so no algorithm will reproduce it. Video 2023 · John Lennox: AI, God and…
- He doubts that mutation and natural selection can bear all the weight put on them, for example in explaining consciousness. Video 2008 · Richard Dawkins vs John Lennox |…
Mental states are brain states, as lightning is an electric discharge; the mind needs nothing beyond the brain.
In Determined to Believe (2017) he challenges the view that God determines everything, including who is saved, while keeping God's sovereignty and human responsibility. A review calls him a four-point Arminian. He says that if we believe in God at all, the idea that God is in some way in control 'goes with the territory', while humans stay responsible.
- If we believe in God at all, the idea that he is in some sense in control goes with it; yet he keeps human responsibility, so God's sovereignty and human freedom go together. Video 2017 · Are God and Faith Anti-Science…
He argues that moral ideas such as good and evil make the most sense if God exists, and that atheism weakens its own moral language. In the Singer debate he grants that atheists can be moral, but says there is no rational justification for morality without God, just as none for rationality.
- Atheists can be moral, but without God there is no rational justification for morality, just as there is none for rationality. He reads Dostoevsky this way. Video 2011 · Peter Singer vs John Lennox | Is…23
- Each person is a moral being made in the image of God, which explains the common moral sense found across cultures and religions. Video 2018 · Lennox Vs Dawkins Debate Has…
- Nietzsche saw it clearly: once God is rejected, the ground of Christian morality goes too. He says soft atheists like Dawkins do not see this, and that Dawkins' 'no good, no evil' leads to a universe without morality. Video 2023 · John Lennox: AI, God and…2
One can be good without believing in God, and ethics does not need him.
He agrees that atheists can be moral, since all people are made in God's image with a conscience. But he says there is no rational justification for morality without God, just as there is none for rationality.
Mixed : The genealogy of morality
He says biblical faith is trust based on evidence, not blind belief. For him faith and reason work together. He says faith means trust grounded in evidence, 'God is not a proposition', and that science itself rests on a kind of faith: 'you don't do science unless you believe it can be done'.
- Faith means trust, not believing without evidence. The new atheists redefined the word; the first question is always what grounds you have for trusting. Video 2026 · Why God Allows Suffering - John…2
- His own faith rests on evidence, especially that of the resurrection, which can be approached by inference to the best explanation, as in forensic science. Video 2008 · Richard Dawkins vs John Lennox |…2
- Everyone has faith: scientists must believe the universe is rationally intelligible before doing science, and atheism is also a belief system. Video 2019 · John Lennox: Has Science Buried…2
- Faith in a person goes beyond propositions: 'God is not a proposition'. We can also believe things we do not fully understand if they explain much, like consciousness or energy. Video 2026 · Why God Allows Suffering - John…2
People in the Gospels believed in miracles because they lived in a pre-scientific age; today we know better, and no testimony can make a miracle credible.
He says the regularities of nature are what let us recognise a miracle: the man born blind knew that such a healing had never happened before. He sees science as having nothing against miracles.
The Gospels are doubtful sources, and religion is irrational because it believes without enough evidence.
He says the resurrection is what launched Christianity, and that Paul was not a believer beforehand. He turns the charge around: atheism is irrational because it derives rationality from mindless processes.
He says science alone cannot give meaning or value, and argues that meaningful information points to a mind. He criticises the view 'the universe is just there, and that's all'. Facing Dawkins and Singer, he says the meaning offered by atheism and reductionism is 'very, very tiny' next to a relationship with the God who made the cosmos.
- If there is a God, life has meaning given from outside: a relationship with the Creator and an eternity beyond the grave. Video 2008 · Lennox Vs Dawkins Debate Has…2
- He finds the meaning offered by atheism and reductionism 'very, very tiny' compared with knowing the God who made the cosmos. Video 2008 · Lennox Vs Dawkins Debate Has…
- His own relationship with God through Christ is for him the supreme evidence that God is real and what fills his life with meaning. Video 2011 · Peter Singer vs John Lennox | Is…
Life needs no given meaning: we can create our own meaning through family, work and our choices.
He says the meaning offered by atheism and reductionism is very, very tiny compared with a relationship with the God who made the cosmos, and adds that of course it is a question of truth.
No sourced position yet on: Source of knowledge, Certainty, Human nature.
On the big questions
Does God exist?Theism
He defends Christian theism and argues it fits with modern science.
- Reason can be trusted only if a rational mind is behind the universe. If our minds come from mindless, unguided processes, we have no ground to trust them, and that includes the reasoning of atheists. Video 2011 · Peter Singer vs John Lennox | Is…23
- Science itself points to God: the fact that the universe is rationally intelligible and that science can be done makes sense if a rational intelligence is behind it. He says it is unreasonable only if you start from atheism. Video 2025 · Why Science Buries Atheism, Not…2
- The Christian message rests on a historical event: Christ died and rose. He says it is the resurrection that launched Christianity, and that Christ's claim is either absurd or true. Video 2008 · Richard Dawkins vs John Lennox |…23
- To the objection 'Who created God?', he answers that the question assumes God is a created being. The God he believes in is uncreated, and the atheist must also stop at something (mass-energy or the universe). Video 2013 · Is God Relevant? Oxford…23
- On evil and suffering, he admits there is no complete answer. He finds enough reason to trust God in the cross, where God took part in human suffering. Video 2011 · Peter Singer vs John Lennox | Is…2
If everything needs a creator, who created God? A designer would be even more complex than what he designed.
He answers that the question assumes God is a created being, while the God he believes in is uncreated. He asks in turn who created the universe, since the atheist must also stop at something.
The universe is vast and humans are a speck of dust: would its creator really choose to have himself tortured to forgive sins on one small planet?
He says size is not the measure of importance, and that if Jesus really rose from the dead as a matter of history, it matters hugely. He adds that this is a moral universe, where simply forgiving would not make sense.
See 1 more objections
There is too much suffering in the world for a good and powerful God.
He admits he has no complete answer, calling it the hardest problem. He finds reason to trust God in the cross, where God took part in human suffering, and says God will bring justice.
Defends : The moral law points to a lawgiver, The fine-tuning of the universe: too perfect a coincidence?, If our reason comes from blind evolution, can we trust it?, The watch and the eye, Sufficient reason: why something rather than nothing?Mixed : The problem of evilCriticizes : Against miracles, Who designed the designer?, Religion, an illusion born of wishes
The question on the site: all the argumentsDoes life have a meaning?A given meaning
Meaning is given, not created: he finds the meaning offered by atheism 'very, very tiny' and finds his own in a relationship with God.
- If there is a God, life has meaning given from outside: a relationship with the Creator and an eternity beyond the grave. Video 2008 · Lennox Vs Dawkins Debate Has…2
- He finds the meaning offered by atheism and reductionism 'very, very tiny' compared with knowing the God who made the cosmos. Video 2008 · Lennox Vs Dawkins Debate Has…
- His own relationship with God through Christ is for him the supreme evidence that God is real and what fills his life with meaning. Video 2011 · Peter Singer vs John Lennox | Is…
Life needs no given meaning: we can create our own meaning through family, work and our choices.
He says the meaning offered by atheism and reductionism is very, very tiny compared with a relationship with the God who made the cosmos, and adds that of course it is a question of truth.
Are we free?Free will
He holds that God is in control at some level, while humans stay responsible for their choices.
- If we believe in God at all, the idea that he is in some sense in control goes with it; yet he keeps human responsibility, so God's sovereignty and human freedom go together. Video 2017 · Are God and Faith Anti-Science…
What makes something right?God's will
He argues there is a strong moral argument for God: without God, morality has no rational base.
- Atheists can be moral, but without God there is no rational justification for morality, just as there is none for rationality. He reads Dostoevsky this way. Video 2011 · Peter Singer vs John Lennox | Is…23
- Each person is a moral being made in the image of God, which explains the common moral sense found across cultures and religions. Video 2018 · Lennox Vs Dawkins Debate Has…
- Nietzsche saw it clearly: once God is rejected, the ground of Christian morality goes too. He says soft atheists like Dawkins do not see this, and that Dawkins' 'no good, no evil' leads to a universe without morality. Video 2023 · John Lennox: AI, God and…2
One can be good without believing in God, and ethics does not need him.
He agrees that atheists can be moral, since all people are made in God's image with a conscience. But he says there is no rational justification for morality without God, just as there is none for rationality.
Mixed : The genealogy of morality
The question on the site: all the argumentsIs the mind the brain?The mind is not matter
He doubts that the human mind can be explained by matter and natural selection alone, and finds Penrose's argument persuasive.
- He thinks the human mind can do non-algorithmic things (Penrose, Gödel), so no algorithm will reproduce it. Video 2023 · John Lennox: AI, God and…
- He doubts that mutation and natural selection can bear all the weight put on them, for example in explaining consciousness. Video 2008 · Richard Dawkins vs John Lennox |…
Mental states are brain states, as lightning is an electric discharge; the mind needs nothing beyond the brain.
Should we fear death?The soul survives
He believes in a God of absolute justice who will make things right one day, and says the problem of death was solved when Christ rose.
- If there is a God of absolute justice, one day he will compensate the innocent victims of suffering. Without God, there is no ultimate justice. Video 2011 · Peter Singer vs John Lennox | Is…2
- The resurrection of Christ solved the problem of physical death twenty centuries ago, and its hope is offered to those who trust him. Video 2023 · John Lennox: AI, God and…
Hope of life after death is wishful thinking: a fairy tale we tell ourselves because we find death hard to accept.
He accepts the Freudian argument but says it works both ways: if there is no God it explains why people invent heaven, and if there is a God it explains the wish not to meet him. So Freud cannot settle the question, and he turns to the person of Christ and the resurrection.
Can a machine think?Understanding is missing
He explains Searle's Chinese room: passing the Turing test is not enough to show consciousness, so he doubts AI can understand.
- Passing the Turing test is not enough to show consciousness: Searle's Chinese room shows that a system can handle symbols without understanding. Video 2023 · John Lennox: AI, God and…
- We do not know what consciousness is, so building a conscious AI is for him virtually hopeless. Following Penrose, he thinks the human mind does things no algorithm can do. Video 2023 · John Lennox: AI, God and…2
If a machine behaves in a way we cannot tell from a person, we should say it thinks: the test is what counts.
Defends : The Chinese room
The question on the site: all the argumentsShould we believe without proof?Faith and reason agree
He presents faith as trust grounded in evidence, not belief against reason.
- Faith means trust, not believing without evidence. The new atheists redefined the word; the first question is always what grounds you have for trusting. Video 2026 · Why God Allows Suffering - John…2
- His own faith rests on evidence, especially that of the resurrection, which can be approached by inference to the best explanation, as in forensic science. Video 2008 · Richard Dawkins vs John Lennox |…2
- Everyone has faith: scientists must believe the universe is rationally intelligible before doing science, and atheism is also a belief system. Video 2019 · John Lennox: Has Science Buried…2
- Faith in a person goes beyond propositions: 'God is not a proposition'. We can also believe things we do not fully understand if they explain much, like consciousness or energy. Video 2026 · Why God Allows Suffering - John…2
People in the Gospels believed in miracles because they lived in a pre-scientific age; today we know better, and no testimony can make a miracle credible.
He says the regularities of nature are what let us recognise a miracle: the man born blind knew that such a healing had never happened before. He sees science as having nothing against miracles.
The Gospels are doubtful sources, and religion is irrational because it believes without enough evidence.
He says the resurrection is what launched Christianity, and that Paul was not a believer beforehand. He turns the charge around: atheism is irrational because it derives rationality from mindless processes.
Why is there something rather than nothing?There is a reason
He says the laws of nature describe the universe but do not create it, so 'a universe from nothing' still needs an origin. For him, either God or nothing created the universe.
- The laws of nature describe what happens but do not cause anything, like Newton's laws and billiard balls. So they cannot create a universe, and Hawking's claim is a mistake. Video 2026 · Why God Allows Suffering - John…2
- The 'nothing' of Krauss and Hawking is a quantum vacuum with laws, not real nothing, so they do not answer Leibniz's question. Video 2021 · John Lennox Discusses the…
- The choice is between God and nothing: either God created the universe or nothing did. For him, mind is primary and matter derivative, and information cannot be reduced to physics and chemistry. Video 2017 · Are God and Faith Anti-Science…234
The laws of physics, such as gravity, can create a universe from nothing, so no creator is needed.
He says the laws of nature describe what happens but do not cause anything, as Newton's laws describe billiard balls without moving them. The nothing of Hawking and Krauss is a quantum vacuum with laws, not real nothing.
Criticizes : A universe can arise from nothing: the quantum vacuum is not stable
The question on the site: all the argumentsCan science explain everything?True, but not everything
Science is powerful because it limits its questions, so it cannot answer questions of meaning or ethics. He rejects the idea that it can explain everything. He points out that Nobel laureates stand on both sides of the question, and that 'science is the only way to truth' is itself not a statement of science.
- The conflict is not between science and God but between two worldviews, theism and materialism. Nobel laureates are found on both sides. Video 2008 · Debate | Michael Shermer vs…
- Science and God explain at different levels, so they complement each other. Like the laws of combustion and Henry Ford for a car, or the physics of boiling water and the wish for a cup of tea. Video 2019 · John Lennox: Has Science Buried…
- Saying that science is the only path to truth is self-refuting, because that statement is not itself a scientific statement. Science cannot answer a child's questions: where do I come from, why am I here? Video 2019 · John Lennox: Has Science Buried…2
- The God he believes in is not a god of the gaps. He finds evidence for God in what science explains, not in what it does not yet understand; belief in a lawgiver even drove Newton and Kepler to search for laws. Video 2023 · John Lennox Dismantles Atheism:…234
Saying God did it wherever science has not yet explained something is a cowardly copout: it is a god of the gaps.
He says there may be two kinds of gaps: bad gaps that science closes, and gaps science itself can open. He finds evidence for God in what science explains, such as the mathematical describability and fine-tuning of the universe.
Most scientists are atheists, so science and religion are in conflict.
He says the conflict is not between science and religion but between two worldviews, theism and materialism, with Nobel laureates on both sides.
Mixed : A theory is scientific if it can be refuted
The question on the site: all the argumentsIn their words
It was belief in God that motivated the advance of science in the 16th and 17th centuries.
Christ claimed to be the way, the truth, and the life. And either that's absurd nonsense or else it's true. Now I'm convinced it is true.
Why do I think that science can bury atheism? It's because science can be done.
if there is a God Freud will give you an equally brilliant explanation of why atheism is wishful thinking
1 more quotes
those explanations don't conflict they don't compete they complement
How the ideas evolved
Click a step for details1943Born in Belfast, raised in Armagh
He was born on 7 November 1943 in Northern Ireland and studied at Cambridge, where he earned a PhD in mathematics.
1962Hears C. S. Lewis's last lectures
As a student at Cambridge he attends C. S. Lewis's final lectures; Lewis stays an influence.
2007God's Undertaker: Has Science Buried God?
His book on science and belief in God appears (first edition 2007, updated edition 2009). It asks why there is something rather than nothing.
2008Debates with Dawkins and Hitchens
He debates Christopher Hitchens in Edinburgh in August and Richard Dawkins at the Oxford Museum of Natural History in October.
2008Debate with Dawkins: God is a person, not just a force
In 'Has Science Buried God?' he says the creator is a person, doubts that mutation and natural selection can bear all the weight put on them, and tells Dawkins that ancient historians do not dispute that Jesus existed.
In their words« I think that there is a creator of the universe. He created it. But he's not just a force. He's a person. »Replying to Dawkins' opening, Lennox says the creator is a personal God and humans are persons made in his image. watch
« I believe the universe is rationally intelligible because there's a creator god behind it »He asks Dawkins to account for the rational intelligibility of the universe, which for him comes from a creator God. watch
« if there is no God, then there's no ultimate justice »He argues that without God there is no ultimate justice, whereas the resurrection gives real hope of a fair evaluation at the end. watch
2008Debate with Shermer: atheism is a belief system
In Sydney he rejects the idea that atheism is only a lack of belief: it includes a negative belief about God and positive beliefs such as naturalism. He also answers 'who created God?' by saying it assumes a created God.
In their words« if all that exists is nature if our own deepest convictions are merely the byproducts of an irrational process »He quotes C. S. Lewis: if our convictions are byproducts of an irrational process, we have no ground to trust them; if reality is a rational spirit, they can be trusted. watch
« getting rid of religion to get rid of its abuses like getting rid of money to abolish greed »He is ashamed of violence done in Christ's name, but says removing religion does not remove suffering, and abolishing God removes hope. watch
« without the cross of Christ it makes no sense to me but if God has really come into our world had taken part in our human suffering I find there enough evidence to trust him »On the problem of evil, he says it is the hardest problem, that the world is damaged like a bombed cathedral, and that the cross gives him grounds to trust God. watch
2011Debate with Peter Singer, books on Genesis and the new atheism
He debates Peter Singer in Melbourne on 'Is There a God?'. The same year he publishes Seven Days That Divide the World and Gunning for God.
2011Against Singer: the resurrection and the problem of evil
He argues that atheism undermines the foundations of rational thought, that the resurrection is what launched Christianity, and that on the cross God became part of human suffering.
In their words« if the thoughts in my mind are just the motions of Athens in my brain »In his opening statement he argues that if human reason is only the product of unguided evolution aimed at survival, we have no reason to trust it, citing Haldane, John Gray and Plantinga. watch
« that is atheism by its reductionism undermines the foundations of the very »He concludes that atheism, by its reductionism, undermines the very foundations of rational thought. watch
« it is my relationship with God through Christ that in the end as if supreme evidence that God is real that fills my life with meaning »He ends his opening statement saying his relationship with God through Christ is the supreme evidence that God is real and fills his life with meaning. watch
2017Determined to Believe
He publishes a book on God's sovereignty, freedom and human responsibility, challenging deterministic readings.
2019Can Science Explain Everything?
He publishes a short book arguing against scientism, the view that science alone gives knowledge.
20202084: Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Humanity
He applies his ideas to AI. He argues that AI only seems intelligent: the intelligence belongs to the people who build it.
The arguments 13
The site's arguments they defend or criticize, and why. Click a title to see the full argument.
He says moral concepts like good and evil make the most sense if God exists, and quotes Dostoevsky: if God does not exist, everything is permitted. He calls it 'a very strong moral argument' and credits Nietzsche with seeing that killing God kills morality.
He cites the fine-tuning of physical constants, for example Fred Hoyle's point that small changes in nuclear energy levels would prevent life, as a sign of design.
His main reply to atheism: if our thoughts are only the by-product of mindless processes, why trust them? 'Atheism is irrational because it tries to derive rationality out of irrationality.'
He takes the problem of evil seriously and admits he has no complete answer. He says atheism does not solve it either, and that in the cross God became part of human suffering.
He argues from the language-like structure of DNA: seeing your name written in the sand, you at once infer an intelligent source.
He uses the Chinese room to say that passing the Turing test does not show consciousness.
He argues that 'science is the only way to truth' is not itself a scientific statement, so scientism refutes itself.
He uses Leibniz's question to criticise Hawking and Krauss: their quantum 'nothing' is not nothing, and the laws of nature still need an origin.
He credits Nietzsche, a serious atheist, with seeing that giving up God removes the ground of Christian morality, a point he says soft atheists miss. He does not share Nietzsche's conclusion.
He answers Hume by saying laws of nature describe regularities, so a miracle does not break them. He uses C. S. Lewis's example of an unexpected banknote. In debate he adds: 'you have to know the laws in order to recognize a miracle'.
He says 'who created God?' assumes a created God, so it does not apply to the uncreated God of the Bible. He jokes that 'The Created God's Delusion' would not have sold many copies.
He says Krauss and Hawking's 'nothing' is a quantum vacuum with laws, so it does not answer why there is something. A universe creating itself from nothing is 'a flat contradiction'.
He turns it around: 'if there is a God Freud will give you an equally brilliant explanation of why atheism is wishful thinking.' So it cannot settle the question.
Allies and opponents
C. S. LewisInfluence
He attended C. S. Lewis's last lectures in 1962 and uses Lewis's examples.
DDavid GoodingClose
Co-author of several books, including Christianity: Opium or Truth? and Being Truly Human.
Francis CollinsClose
A friend: he says they both affirm that Jesus rose from the dead, and he cites Collins as a Christian scientist.
RRoger PenroseInfluence
He finds Penrose's argument persuasive that the human mind does things no algorithm can do.
Richard DawkinsDisagrees
Two public debates in 2007 and 2008, including 'Has Science Buried God?'.
Christopher HitchensDisagrees
Debated in Edinburgh (2008) and at Samford University (2009).
Peter SingerDisagrees
Debated 'Is There a God?' in Melbourne in 2011.
Lawrence KraussDisagrees
Debate opponent; he answers Krauss's 'universe from nothing' by saying a quantum vacuum is not nothing.
Stephen HawkingDisagrees
His 2011 book God and Stephen Hawking: Whose Design Is It Anyway? replies to Hawking.
MMichael ShermerDisagrees
Debated in Sydney in 2008.
Signature ideas
Different kinds of explanation
Like the physics of boiling water and the reason someone boils it, the science explanation and the God explanation answer different questions. He says they do not compete.
'Who created God?' assumes a created God
The question only makes sense if God is created. The God of the Bible is not, so he asks instead who or what created the universe: either God or nothing.
Closest and furthest
how it is computedAmong the philosophers
Among today's voices
Take the Compass: 5 minutes to find out which philosophers you are closest to.
All sources (111)
- John Lennox Wikipedia · 2026
- John Lennox: Science doesn't explain what you think it does (transcript) Singju Post (Practical Wisdom Conference 2023) · 2023
- John Lennox - Wikiquote Wikiquote · 2024
- Determined to Believe? (review) Evangelical Times · 2017 *
- Has Science Buried God? Richard Dawkins and John Lennox Debate johnlennox.org · 2008
- Debate: Is there a God? Lennox v Singer Apologetics315 · 2021
- 2084 - Dr John Lennox (Cross Examined, transcript) Cross Examined · 2020 *
- John Lennox: The Truth About AI, Consciousness and God (transcript) Practical Wisdom (via The Singju Post) · 2024 *
- Science, Mathematics and Meaning Dromore Non-Subscribing Presbyterian Church · 2026 *
- God and Stephen Hawking (Lennox) HyperPhysics (Georgia State University) · 2026 *
- Professor John Lennox | God DOES exist YouTube (republication) · 2012
- Debate | Michael Shermer vs John Lennox Does God Exist YouTube · 2008
- Richard Dawkins vs John Lennox | Has Science Buried God? Debate YouTube · 2008
- Richard Dawkins vs John Lennox | Has Science Buried God? Debate YouTube · 2008
- Peter Singer vs John Lennox | Is There a God? Debate YouTube · 2011
- Peter Singer vs John Lennox | Is There a God? Debate YouTube · 2011
- Peter Singer vs John Lennox | Is There a God? Debate YouTube · 2011
- John Lennox: The Question of Science and God - Part 1 YouTube (republication) · 2018
- John Lennox: Has Science Buried God? YouTube (republication) · 2019
- John Lennox: Has Science Buried God? YouTube (republication) · 2019
- John Lennox Discusses the Beginning of the Universe - Science Uprising Expert Interview YouTube (republication) · 2021
- Can Science Explain Everything? John Lennox & James Tour | Age of the Earth, Evolution & God YouTube (republication) · 2023
- Can Science Explain Everything? John Lennox & James Tour | Age of the Earth, Evolution & God YouTube (republication) · 2023
- John Lennox: AI, God and Consciousness (Brilliant Insights!) YouTube (republication) · 2023
- John Lennox Mic DROPS in Middle of Debate with Atheist Peter Singer YouTube (republication) · 2025
- Why God Allows Suffering - John Lennox YouTube (republication) · 2026
- Michael Ruse vs John Lennox • Science, faith, and the evidence for God YouTube (republication) · 2018
- Are God and Faith Anti-Science and Anti-Reason? John Lennox YouTube (republication) · 2017
- John Lennox: AI, God and Consciousness (Brilliant Insights!) YouTube (republication) · 2023
- Is God Relevant? Oxford Professor John Lennox Discusses Science and Faith at Tulane YouTube · 2013
- Are God and Faith Anti-Science and Anti-Reason? John Lennox YouTube · 2017
- John Lennox: The Question of Science and God - Part 1 YouTube · 2018
- Can Science Explain Everything? John Lennox & James Tour | Age of the Earth, Evolution & God YouTube · 2023
- Why God Allows Suffering - John Lennox YouTube · 2026
- Why God Allows Suffering - John Lennox YouTube · 2026
- John Lennox Dismantles Atheism: God or Science - Why the Choice? (10 Minute Brilliancy) YouTube · 2023
- Richard Dawkins vs John Lennox | Has Science Buried God? Debate (at 32:40) YouTube · 2008
- Richard Dawkins vs John Lennox | Has Science Buried God? Debate YouTube · 2008
- Why Science Buries Atheism, Not God | Professor John Lennox YouTube (republication) · 2025
- Professor John Lennox | God DOES exist YouTube (republication) · 2012
- John Lennox: Has Science Buried God? YouTube (republication) · 2019
- Richard Dawkins vs John Lennox | Has Science Buried God? Debate YouTube · 2008
- Lennox Vs Dawkins Debate Has Science Buried God YouTube · 2008
- Peter Singer vs John Lennox | Is There a God? Debate YouTube · 2011
- John Lennox: AI, God and Consciousness (Brilliant Insights!) YouTube (republication) · 2023
- Are God and Faith Anti-Science and Anti-Reason? John Lennox YouTube (republication) · 2017
- John Lennox: AI, God and Consciousness (Brilliant Insights!) YouTube (republication) · 2023
- John Lennox: AI, God and Consciousness (Brilliant Insights!) YouTube (republication) · 2023
- Peter Singer vs John Lennox | Is There a God? Debate YouTube · 2011
- John Lennox: Has Science Buried God? YouTube (republication) · 2019
- Why Science Buries Atheism, Not God | Professor John Lennox YouTube (republication) · 2025
- Peter Singer vs John Lennox | Is There a God? Debate YouTube · 2011
- Is God Relevant? Oxford Professor John Lennox Discusses Science and Faith at Tulane YouTube (republication) · 2013
- Debate | Michael Shermer vs John Lennox Does God Exist YouTube · 2008
- John Lennox Mic DROPS in Middle of Debate with Atheist Peter Singer YouTube (republication) · 2025
- Debate | Michael Shermer vs John Lennox Does God Exist YouTube · 2016
- Debate | Michael Shermer vs John Lennox Does God Exist YouTube · 2016
- Debate | Michael Shermer vs John Lennox Does God Exist YouTube · 2008
- John Lennox: Has Science Buried God? YouTube (republication) · 2019
- Are God and Faith Anti-Science and Anti-Reason? John Lennox YouTube (republication) · 2017
- Richard Dawkins vs John Lennox | Has Science Buried God? Debate (at 30:50) YouTube · 2008
- Richard Dawkins vs John Lennox | Has Science Buried God? Debate (at 30:50) YouTube · 2008
- John Lennox: Has Science Buried God? YouTube (republication) · 2019
- John Lennox: Has Science Buried God? YouTube (republication) · 2019
- John Lennox: Has Science Buried God? YouTube (republication) · 2019
- Why God Allows Suffering - John Lennox YouTube (republication) · 2026
- Why God Allows Suffering - John Lennox YouTube (republication) · 2026
- Peter Singer vs John Lennox | Is There a God? Debate YouTube · 2011
- Are God and Faith Anti-Science and Anti-Reason? John Lennox YouTube (republication) · 2017
- Why God Allows Suffering - John Lennox YouTube · 2026
- John Lennox Discusses the Beginning of the Universe - Science Uprising Expert Interview YouTube (republication) · 2021
- Can Science Explain Everything? John Lennox & James Tour | Age of the Earth, Evolution & God YouTube · 2023
- John Lennox Mic DROPS in Middle of Debate with Atheist Peter Singer YouTube · 2025
- Are God and Faith Anti-Science and Anti-Reason? John Lennox YouTube (republication) · 2017
- Is God Relevant? Oxford Professor John Lennox Discusses Science and Faith at Tulane YouTube (republication) · 2013
- Lennox Vs Dawkins Debate Has Science Buried God YouTube · 2008
- Peter Singer vs John Lennox | Is There a God? Debate YouTube · 2011
- Peter Singer vs John Lennox | Is There a God? Debate (at 85:00) YouTube · 2011
- Can Science Explain Everything? John Lennox & James Tour | Age of the Earth, Evolution & God YouTube (republication) · 2023
- Can Science Explain Everything? John Lennox & James Tour | Age of the Earth, Evolution & God YouTube (republication) · 2023
- John Lennox: AI, God and Consciousness (Brilliant Insights!) YouTube (republication) · 2023
- Lennox Vs Dawkins Debate Has Science Buried God YouTube · 2018
- John Lennox: AI, God and Consciousness (Brilliant Insights!) YouTube (republication) · 2023
- Can Science Explain Everything? John Lennox & James Tour | Age of the Earth, Evolution & God YouTube (republication) · 2023
- Peter Singer vs John Lennox | Is There a God? Debate (at 55:10) YouTube · 2011
- Peter Singer vs John Lennox | Is There a God? Debate YouTube · 2011
- John Lennox: AI, God and Consciousness (Brilliant Insights!) YouTube (republication) · 2023
- Richard Dawkins vs John Lennox | Has Science Buried God? Debate YouTube · 2008
- Richard Dawkins vs John Lennox | Has Science Buried God? Debate YouTube · 2008
- Richard Dawkins vs John Lennox | Has Science Buried God? Debate YouTube · 2008
- Lennox Vs Dawkins Debate Has Science Buried God YouTube · 2008
- Peter Singer vs John Lennox | Is There a God? Debate YouTube · 2011
- Can Science Explain Everything? John Lennox & James Tour | Age of the Earth, Evolution & God YouTube (republication) · 2023
- John Lennox: AI, God and Consciousness (Brilliant Insights!) YouTube (republication) · 2023
- John Lennox Discusses the Beginning of the Universe - Science Uprising Expert Interview YouTube (republication) · 2021
- Is God Relevant? Oxford Professor John Lennox Discusses Science and Faith at Tulane YouTube (republication) · 2013
- John Lennox Mic DROPS in Middle of Debate with Atheist Peter Singer YouTube (republication) · 2025
- Is God Relevant? Oxford Professor John Lennox Discusses Science and Faith at Tulane YouTube (republication) · 2013
- John Lennox Mic DROPS in Middle of Debate with Atheist Peter Singer YouTube (republication) · 2025
- John Lennox Discusses the Beginning of the Universe - Science Uprising Expert Interview YouTube (republication) · 2021
- Why God Allows Suffering - John Lennox YouTube (republication) · 2026
- Michael Ruse vs John Lennox • Science, faith, and the evidence for God YouTube (republication) · 2018
- Richard Dawkins vs John Lennox | Has Science Buried God? Debate YouTube · 2008
- Lennox Vs Dawkins Debate Has Science Buried God YouTube · 2008
- Peter Singer vs John Lennox | Is There a God? Debate YouTube · 2011
- Is God Relevant? Oxford Professor John Lennox Discusses Science and Faith at Tulane YouTube (republication) · 2013
- Debate | Michael Shermer vs John Lennox Does God Exist YouTube · 2008
- Richard Dawkins vs John Lennox | Has Science Buried God? Debate YouTube · 2008
- Why Science Buries Atheism, Not God | Professor John Lennox YouTube (republication) · 2025
- Peter Singer vs John Lennox | Is There a God? Debate YouTube · 2011
- John Lennox: Has Science Buried God? YouTube (republication) · 2019