Philip Goff
Panpsychist philosopher: consciousness is fundamental; defends cosmic purpose.
20 videos analysed · 118 quotes checked word for word · updated 2026-10-18
Key facts
- He is a professor of philosophy at Durham University; his PhD (University of Reading) was supervised by Galen Strawson. Wikipédia 2025 · Philip Goff (philosopher)
- His books include Consciousness and Fundamental Reality (2017), Galileo's Error (2019) and Why? The Purpose of the Universe (2023). Wikipédia 2025 · Philip Goff (philosopher)
- He was raised Catholic, turned atheist at 14 and stayed one for about 30 years before his return to Christianity. Video 2026 · Is Consciousness Everywhere? |…
- He goes to an Anglican church and is drawn to Eastern Orthodox mysticism; he is writing a book tentatively titled 'Heresy'. Video 2026 · Is Consciousness Everywhere? |…
Positions
click a row to see the evidenceRaised Catholic, he was a 'happy atheist' for about 30 years. In 2019 he said 'I don't call it God'; in 2023 he felt closest to God in the morning light, 'whatever that means'. Since 2024 he believes in a God of limited power: 'it's a brute fact that God is limited', which fits the evidence of suffering better. He says an all-powerful loving Creator is 'incredibly unlikely'. He is less sure of Christianity than of the limited God, calls it 'a real live option', and says he believes in the resurrection 'in some sense'.
1992 At 14 he rejects his Catholic upbringing and becomes a 'happy atheist' for about 30 years. Video 2026 · Is Consciousness Everywhere? |…
2023 In Why? and an Aeon essay he says neither atheism nor theism adequately explains reality, and finds the all-powerful, all-good God a poor explanation of cosmic purpose. In April 2023 he calls his coming book 'a middle way between God and atheism'. Article 2023 · Why our universe can have cosmic…
2024 He announces he is a Christian 'because I choose to trust that Christianity is true', with a God of limited powers as his most confident belief. Article 2024 · Embracing Uncertainty
- Both sides of the God versus atheism debate get something right and something wrong. Theists struggle to explain suffering, atheists struggle to explain fine-tuning. Video 2026 · Is Consciousness Everywhere? |…
- Given the amount of suffering, an all-powerful and loving Creator is incredibly unlikely. Video 2024 · Debating God With The Archbishop…
- So he proposes a God of limited powers, a simple hypothesis that explains both fine-tuning and suffering. That God is limited is a brute fact, which he holds because of the evidence. Video 2026 · Does God Have Limited Powers? A…
- His case for cosmic purpose comes from science and philosophy, not from a mystical experience. Video 2019 · Is the Universe Conscious? -…
Limiting God's power only to the cosmic constants is ad hoc, and a limited God could still have stopped evils like Hitler's.
He answers that his hypothesis is very simple, simpler than physics: God cannot intervene after fixing the constants. God can only reabsorb aspects of himself that became physical, so he could not remove Hitler.
An all-powerful, loving God would not allow so much suffering.
He agrees, which is why he thinks God is not all-powerful. A God of limited powers is a simple hypothesis that explains both suffering and fine-tuning.
Defends : The fine-tuning of the universe: too perfect a coincidence?, The problem of evil, If God seems present, he probably isMixed : If it is possible, it exists: the modal ontological argumentCriticizes : That than which nothing greater can be conceived exists, Against miracles
There is an objective truth, but 'we'll never know it for certain': we can only give our best guess, with a probability. He warns against dogmatic certainty, from militant atheists as much as from fundamentalists.
He defends panpsychism, a 'third way' between materialism and dualism: 'consciousness is the stuff of matter'. He calls dualism 'hopeless' because neuroscience puts consciousness in the brain, and says science has 'got precisely nowhere' explaining it from non-conscious matter. His argument: 'we know we can get physics out of consciousness'. He started out as a materialist, and by 2023 he doubted that physics alone fixes what the brain does. He puts his confidence in panpsychism at about 60%.
2018 In a 2018 debate he already calls panpsychism the 'middle way' between materialism and dualism. Video 2018 · Full Debate | The Secrets of…
2019 Galileo's Error argues that physical science describes only what matter does, and that consciousness is part of what matter is. Book 2019 · Galileo's Error: Foundations for…
- We cannot derive consciousness from physics, but we can derive physics from consciousness. Nothing is more evident than our own experience, yet science has not explained it. Video 2025 · Exploring Consciousness and…2
- Trying to explain consciousness through non-conscious brain processes has failed for decades. He calls it a materialist prejudice that this is what we have to do. Video 2019 · Is the Universe Conscious? -…2
- Physical science did so well because Galileo took consciousness out of its domain. So we should not expect it to explain consciousness. Video 2018 · Full Debate | The Secrets of…
- Dualism is hopeless for him: neuroscience gives strong evidence that consciousness is in the brain. Panpsychism is the middle way, with simple forms of experience in the building blocks of matter. Video 2018 · Full Debate | The Secrets of…2
Why would tiny conscious particles add up to one unified mind, and why is a table not conscious?
He admits this combination problem is tricky, since consciousness seems deeply unified. He would be happy with a primitivist answer: it is simply a basic fact about our world that such systems have unified minds.
Consciousness is an illusion: there is nothing extra to explain, so no hard problem.
He says we should be more agnostic about free will than about consciousness, but sees no good scientific or philosophical argument against libertarian free will, and disagrees with Sam Harris.
He believes there are objective facts about value and what we ought to do, mostly tied to kinds of conscious experience, while admitting it is mysterious how we know them. He is not a 'simple consequentialist'.
He says faith is about hope or trust rather than belief, and that about 30% probability is enough for faith to be rational: 'I prefer to think of faith as about hope or trust'. This idea predates his conversion: in 2019 and 2022 he already called the religious impulse hope, not belief. He keeps reason as judge and cites William James on the right to believe.
- Faith is not certainty or even high probability. It is hope and trust, in your spiritual experiences and in a framework to interpret them. Video 2022 · Philip Goff: Consciousness,…2
- Once a God of limited powers is accepted, his version of Christianity is a real live option. He is confident enough to have faith in it, but less sure than about that God. Video 2025 · Philip Goff vs 3 atheists, is…2
- Religions have always reinterpreted themselves in the light of the science and philosophy of their time, and he wants to do the same, using our best science, philosophy and biblical scholarship. Video 2024 · Debating God With The Archbishop…2
A resurrection is so improbable that no testimony could make it believable.
He says the evidence, above all Paul's letters, is strong: for an ordinary event it would be a no-brainer. So much hangs on the prior probability, which he argues is reasonable once a God of limited powers is accepted.
A mystical experience tells us nothing about reality: it could be like a brain in a vat.
He answers that our knowledge always starts from what seems most evident to us. If we trust ordinary sensory experience, refusing to trust a mystical one is a double standard (William James).
Defends : We have the right to believe when evidence cannot decide
He sees an 'overwhelming case' for a cosmic purpose and lives in hope of it. But he is 'an objectivist' about meaning: knowledge, creativity and kindness are meaningful even without cosmic purpose, and 'we can't just decide for ourselves what's meaningful'. A cosmic purpose would add a greater meaning.
- He sees an overwhelming case for cosmic purpose, held back only by the chance that the evidence changes. Video 2023 · Consciousness and Cosmic Purpose…
- It has become important to him to live in hope that the universe has a purpose, and that his small good is part of it. Video 2023 · Philosopher Explains What…
Believing in a cosmic purpose is wishful thinking.
He says philosophers should look for the view most likely to be true, not the one they would like. He finds the case for cosmic purpose strong, unless the evidence changes.
No sourced position yet on: Source of knowledge, Human nature.
On the big questions
Does God exist?Theism
Since 2024, belief in a God of limited power inside a heterodox Christianity.
- Both sides of the God versus atheism debate get something right and something wrong. Theists struggle to explain suffering, atheists struggle to explain fine-tuning. Video 2026 · Is Consciousness Everywhere? |…
- Given the amount of suffering, an all-powerful and loving Creator is incredibly unlikely. Video 2024 · Debating God With The Archbishop…
- So he proposes a God of limited powers, a simple hypothesis that explains both fine-tuning and suffering. That God is limited is a brute fact, which he holds because of the evidence. Video 2026 · Does God Have Limited Powers? A…
- His case for cosmic purpose comes from science and philosophy, not from a mystical experience. Video 2019 · Is the Universe Conscious? -…
Limiting God's power only to the cosmic constants is ad hoc, and a limited God could still have stopped evils like Hitler's.
He answers that his hypothesis is very simple, simpler than physics: God cannot intervene after fixing the constants. God can only reabsorb aspects of himself that became physical, so he could not remove Hitler.
An all-powerful, loving God would not allow so much suffering.
He agrees, which is why he thinks God is not all-powerful. A God of limited powers is a simple hypothesis that explains both suffering and fine-tuning.
Defends : The fine-tuning of the universe: too perfect a coincidence?, The problem of evil, If God seems present, he probably isMixed : If it is possible, it exists: the modal ontological argumentCriticizes : That than which nothing greater can be conceived exists, Against miracles
The question on the site: all the argumentsDoes life have a meaning?A given meaning
Closest camp: he argues the universe has a cosmic purpose, though people can also create meaning themselves.
- He sees an overwhelming case for cosmic purpose, held back only by the chance that the evidence changes. Video 2023 · Consciousness and Cosmic Purpose…
- It has become important to him to live in hope that the universe has a purpose, and that his small good is part of it. Video 2023 · Philosopher Explains What…
Believing in a cosmic purpose is wishful thinking.
He says philosophers should look for the view most likely to be true, not the one they would like. He finds the case for cosmic purpose strong, unless the evidence changes.
Is the mind the brain?The mind is not matter
Closest camp: he rejects materialism but is not a dualist in the classic sense; his panpsychism is a 'third way'.
- We cannot derive consciousness from physics, but we can derive physics from consciousness. Nothing is more evident than our own experience, yet science has not explained it. Video 2025 · Exploring Consciousness and…2
- Trying to explain consciousness through non-conscious brain processes has failed for decades. He calls it a materialist prejudice that this is what we have to do. Video 2019 · Is the Universe Conscious? -…2
- Physical science did so well because Galileo took consciousness out of its domain. So we should not expect it to explain consciousness. Video 2018 · Full Debate | The Secrets of…
- Dualism is hopeless for him: neuroscience gives strong evidence that consciousness is in the brain. Panpsychism is the middle way, with simple forms of experience in the building blocks of matter. Video 2018 · Full Debate | The Secrets of…2
Why would tiny conscious particles add up to one unified mind, and why is a table not conscious?
He admits this combination problem is tricky, since consciousness seems deeply unified. He would be happy with a primitivist answer: it is simply a basic fact about our world that such systems have unified minds.
Consciousness is an illusion: there is nothing extra to explain, so no hard problem.
Defends : Mary, the scientist who has never seen red
The question on the site: all the argumentsCan a machine think?Understanding is missing
Real understanding is tied to consciousness. He does not think a large language model is conscious, so it has no real thought; he thinks artificial consciousness may be possible, and doubts that uploading a mind would keep the experience.
- To know whether an artificial system really understands, we have to ask if it is conscious, and he does not think a large language model is. Video 2026 · Why Your Brain Doesn't Create…
- As a panpsychist, consciousness is the stuff of matter, not software. So uploading a mind might copy the software but lose the experience. Video 2022 · Philip Goff: Consciousness,…
If a machine can pass the imitation game, it thinks.
He says Turing redefined thought as behaviour. For him real thought and understanding are bound up with conscious experience, so we must ask whether the system is conscious, and he does not think a large language model is.
Should we believe without proof?Faith goes beyond
Closest camp: faith as trust that goes beyond proof, while keeping a rough probability (below 50%) for Christianity.
- Faith is not certainty or even high probability. It is hope and trust, in your spiritual experiences and in a framework to interpret them. Video 2022 · Philip Goff: Consciousness,…2
- Once a God of limited powers is accepted, his version of Christianity is a real live option. He is confident enough to have faith in it, but less sure than about that God. Video 2025 · Philip Goff vs 3 atheists, is…2
- Religions have always reinterpreted themselves in the light of the science and philosophy of their time, and he wants to do the same, using our best science, philosophy and biblical scholarship. Video 2024 · Debating God With The Archbishop…2
A resurrection is so improbable that no testimony could make it believable.
He says the evidence, above all Paul's letters, is strong: for an ordinary event it would be a no-brainer. So much hangs on the prior probability, which he argues is reasonable once a God of limited powers is accepted.
A mystical experience tells us nothing about reality: it could be like a brain in a vat.
He answers that our knowledge always starts from what seems most evident to us. If we trust ordinary sensory experience, refusing to trust a mystical one is a double standard (William James).
Defends : We have the right to believe when evidence cannot decide
The question on the site: all the argumentsWhy is there something rather than nothing?The first mystery
He thinks there must be an explanation, a being that explains its own existence, but that it is beyond human understanding: 'I'm a sort of mysterian about this question'.
- The answer is probably a self-explaining being, but it is beyond human understanding: he calls himself a mysterian. Video 2023 · Consciousness and Cosmic Purpose…
There may be no explanation: the universe could simply be there, as a brute fact.
Mixed : Nothing would be simpler: there must be a reason
The question on the site: all the argumentsIn their words
I'm a Christian because I choose to trust that Christianity is true.
we should be aiming not at the view we'd like to be true, but at the view that's most likely to be true
I prefer to think of faith as about hope or trust
We don't know if we can get consciousness out of physics, but we know we can get physics out of consciousness
1 more quotes
both sides of this perennial debate between God and atheism both sides get something right and something wrong
How the ideas evolved
Click a step for details1992 Change of mindCatholic child, then atheist
Raised Catholic, he turns atheist at 14, partly because of the problem of evil, and stays a 'happy atheist' for about 30 years.
In their words« We don't know if we can get consciousness out of physics, but we know we can get physics out of consciousness »His core panpsychist argument: we cannot derive consciousness from physics, but we can derive physics from consciousness. watch
« I think even more than Russell, William James is my big hero »William James is his big hero, even more than Bertrand Russell. watch
« The problem of evil and suffering was part of it on the intellectual side »Why he became an atheist at 14: the problem of evil, plus ethical objections to Christianity. watch
2017Panpsychism as a third way
After reading Thomas Nagel on panpsychism he finds a way out. He publishes Consciousness and Fundamental Reality, his academic defence of the view.
2019Galileo's Error
His general-audience book argues that physical science leaves out consciousness, and that panpsychism fills the gap.
2019Hope, not belief
Before any conversion, he says the religious impulse is more about hope than belief. He does not call his cosmic purpose 'God'.
In their words« We've we've tried for decades now to explain consciousness in terms of non-consciousness, and we've got precisely nowhere »In 2019 he says neuroscience has got nowhere on the hard problem, so explain complex consciousness by simpler consciousness. watch
« I think it's a prejudice of materialists to suppose that's what we have to do »He calls it a materialist prejudice to suppose consciousness must be explained by non-consciousness. watch
« the religious impulse in my view or the spiritual impulse, if you prefer, should be thought of as more about hope rather than belief »Already in 2019, before his turn to Christianity, he sees the religious impulse as hope rather than belief. watch
2021Mind Chat with Keith Frankish
He starts a YouTube channel with Keith Frankish, who defends illusionism. They interview scientists and philosophers of consciousness and debate each other in a friendly way.
2023Why? The Purpose of the Universe
He argues that fine-tuning and the existence of consciousness point to a cosmic purpose. He favours the idea that the universe is itself a conscious mind (cosmopsychism) over the traditional God.
2023A purpose, and 'closest to God'
In April, before Why? comes out, he presents it as a middle way between God and atheism, and says he feels closest to God in the soft morning light, 'whatever that means'.
In their words« so my view is that when Consciousness emerges it makes a difference so you couldn't predict what my brain is doing just from the physics »He thinks consciousness makes a physical difference, and disagrees with Sean Carroll that physics alone fixes the brain. watch
« that's where I disagree with Sean Carroll »He disagrees with Sean Carroll about whether physics alone determines the brain. watch
« it's not only on pan psychism you might see it as a kind a middle way between God and Atheism »In April 2023 he presents his coming book as a middle way between God and atheism. watch
2024 Change of mindA 'heretical' Christian
In October he explains that he has moved to a participatory Christianity with a God of limited power, with about a 50% credence.
2025Defending a limited God
In debates with Craig and with three atheists he defends a God who set the constants of physics but cannot intervene afterwards. He says he does not 'believe' Christianity is true, but trusts it at about 30% or more, and describes the resurrection as visionary rather than a body seen and touched.
In their words« I don't believe Christianity to be true which might sound a bit silly »He opens by saying he does not 'believe' Christianity is true, because he prefers to see faith as hope or trust. watch
« I prefer to think of faith as about hope or trust »He defines faith as hope or trust, not high-confidence belief. watch
« maybe 30% is the number I throw up »For trust to be rational he needs a credible possibility: about 30%. watch
2025Mystical roots of Christianity
He says he once found depth only in Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, then discovers the mystics of the Eastern Church. He settles between Eastern mysticism and Anglican flexibility, and starts a book (tentative title 'Heresy').
In their words« It's consciousness that breathes fire into the equations »Using Hawking's phrase: physics gives mathematical structure, and consciousness is what fills it. watch
« Maybe maybe the conscious universe can as it were design itself, finetune itself »A conscious universe might fine-tune itself, so no supernatural designer is needed. watch
« I think of faith more is about trust it's about trusting your spiritual experiences »Faith is trust in your spiritual experiences and in a framework to interpret them, not certainty. watch
The arguments 10
The site's arguments they defend or criticize, and why. Click a title to see the full argument.
He says fine-tuning is, by normal standards of evidence, evidence for goal-directedness, and 'we're in denial about this as a society'. If a Christian can say 'God has a reason for suffering', he may say fine-tuning has a reason too. But he draws a cosmic purpose from it, not necessarily the traditional God: a conscious universe could fine-tune itself.
He says the argument from evil makes an all-powerful loving Creator 'incredibly unlikely'. His answer is a God (or a conscious universe) of limited power, 'because I don't think the universe is all powerful'.
Uses the knowledge argument (Mary) to show that physical description leaves out what experience is like.
William James is his 'big hero'. He agrees one may hope beyond the evidence: refusing to believe can also make you miss a truth.
He argues it is a double standard to trust our senses but not a mystical experience, and cites James on mysticism.
Physical science succeeded 'because Galileo kicks things off by taking consciousness out of its domain', so it cannot be expected to explain it.
He prefers the modal version to Anselm's and thinks it shows that a necessary being either exists or is impossible, but says in the end we do not know.
He thinks there must be an explanation for why there is something, a being that explains its own existence, but sees no reason to give it the traits of the traditional God.
He says there are no a priori arguments for any kind of god and that the ontological arguments do not work.
On the resurrection, he says the evidence would be a 'no-brainer' for an ordinary event, so everything hangs on the prior; he thinks it is reasonable if a God of limited powers exists.
Allies and opponents
John Stuart MillInfluence
He takes seriously Mill's hypothesis of a good God of limited abilities.
Galen StrawsonClose
Galen Strawson supervised his PhD and is a fellow panpsychist.
Thomas NagelInfluence
Reading Nagel's paper on panpsychism helped him leave dualism and materialism behind.
David ChalmersSparring partner
He has criticised Chalmers and Kelvin McQueen's naturalistic dualism, while sharing an interest in panpsychism.
William JamesInfluence
'William James is my big hero', even more than Russell: on panpsychism, religion and the right to believe.
William Lane CraigSparring partner
He debated William Lane Craig in 2025 and calls him 'a great philosopher, very bright', while rejecting his Molinism and his view of Christianity.
Sean CarrollSparring partner
He loves Carroll for taking philosophy seriously but disagrees on almost everything, for example whether physics alone fixes what the brain does.
KKeith FrankishSparring partner
His Mind Chat co-host is an illusionist: Goff thinks consciousness is everywhere, Frankish thinks it is nowhere.
KKaren ArmstrongInfluence
Her view that 'belief' became too intellectual in modern times shaped his idea of faith as trust.
Alex O'ConnorDisagrees
They disagree about fine-tuning: Goff does not think it is a problem that will be solved. They debated twice in 2024-2025.
Sam HarrisDisagrees
He disagrees with Harris, who sees an overwhelming case against free will.
Daniel DennettDisagrees
He thinks narrative theories can explain the self but not consciousness as experience.
BBernardo KastrupDisagrees
He sees little difference between panpsychism and Kastrup's idealism, but finds no argument for consciousness only where there is life.
Debates and big conversations
Signature ideas
Cosmopsychism
By 2020 he describes his view as cosmopsychism: the universe as a whole is the basic conscious subject, and the physical world is fundamental.
A God of limited power
A God who can set the constants of physics at the start but cannot intervene afterwards: a simple hypothesis that explains both fine-tuning and suffering. It is a brute fact that God is limited, he says, because that fits the evidence.
Closest and furthest
how it is computedAmong the philosophers
Among today's voices
Take the Compass: 5 minutes to find out which philosophers you are closest to.
All sources (90)
- Philip Goff (philosopher) Wikipedia · 2025
- Galileo's Error: Foundations for a New Science of Consciousness Penguin Random House · 2019 *
- Embracing Uncertainty Philip Goff (Substack) · 2024
- Conversion Review: Philip Goff Wollenblog (Substack) · 2024
- Why our universe can have cosmic purpose without God Aeon · 2023
- Why? The Purpose of the Universe (Templeton Foundation) Templeton Foundation · 2026
- I now think a heretical form of Christianity might be true Aeon · 2024
- A conscious universe IAI News · 2020
- Philip Goff: Why? The Purpose of the Universe (review) ISCAST Journal · 2024 *
- Mind Chat Mind Chat (listing) · 2021 *
- Galileo's Error, by Philip Goff (review) Times Higher Education · 2019 *
- Is Consciousness Everywhere? | Ep. 38 | Dr Philip Goff on Panpsychism & the Meaning of the Universe YouTube · 2026
- Does God Have Limited Powers? A Debate with Philip Goff YouTube · 2026
- Debating God With The Archbishop of Canterbury, Philip Goff, and Elizabeth Oldfield YouTube · 2024
- Philip Goff vs 3 atheists, is there a limited God? The SciPhi Show 15 YouTube · 2025
- Why Does The Universe Exist? Panpsychism, Fine-Tuning & Cosmic Purpose | Philip Goff YouTube · 2025
- Philosopher Explains What Consciousness Is - Philip Goff YouTube · 2023
- Is Consciousness Everywhere? | Ep. 38 | Dr Philip Goff on Panpsychism & the Meaning of the Universe YouTube · 2026
- The Universe Fine-Tuned Itself - God Not Needed | Philip Goff YouTube · 2025
- Panpsychism & The Purpose of Our Universe | Philip Goff's New Book YouTube · 2023
- Philip Pullman & Philip Goff in conversation: Galileo's Error, consciousness & philosophy YouTube · 2019
- Why Your Brain Doesn't Create Consciousness: It's Always Been There (ft. Philip Goff) YouTube · 2026
- Is Consciousness Everywhere? | Ep. 38 | Dr Philip Goff on Panpsychism & the Meaning of the Universe YouTube · 2026
- Is Consciousness Everywhere? | Ep. 38 | Dr Philip Goff on Panpsychism & the Meaning of the Universe YouTube · 2026
- Debating God With The Archbishop of Canterbury, Philip Goff, and Elizabeth Oldfield YouTube · 2024
- Does God Have Limited Powers? A Debate with Philip Goff YouTube · 2026
- Does God Have Limited Powers? A Debate with Philip Goff YouTube · 2026
- Is the Universe Conscious? - Panpsychism with Philip Goff YouTube · 2019
- Consciousness and Cosmic Purpose | Philip Goff on the Fine-Tuning of the Universe and Panpsychism YouTube · 2023
- The Universe Fine-Tuned Itself - God Not Needed | Philip Goff YouTube · 2025
- The Universe Fine-Tuned Itself - God Not Needed | Philip Goff YouTube · 2025
- Does God Have Limited Power? | Debate Between William Lane Craig & Philip Goff YouTube · 2025
- Does God Have Limited Power? | Debate Between William Lane Craig & Philip Goff YouTube · 2025
- Philip Goff vs 3 atheists, is there a limited God? The SciPhi Show 15 YouTube · 2025
- Full Debate | The Secrets of Consciousness | Philip Goff, Susan Blackmore, Nicholas Humphrey YouTube · 2018
- Is the Universe Conscious? - Panpsychism with Philip Goff YouTube · 2019
- Panpsychism & The Purpose of Our Universe | Philip Goff's New Book YouTube · 2023
- Exploring Consciousness and Non-Ordinary Religion, Panpsychism, and Heretical Ideas — Philip Goff YouTube · 2025
- Philip Goff: Consciousness, Panpsychism, and the Philosophy of Mind | Lex Fridman Podcast #261 YouTube · 2022
- Is the Universe Conscious? - Panpsychism with Philip Goff YouTube · 2019
- Philip Goff vs 3 atheists, is there a limited God? The SciPhi Show 15 YouTube · 2025
- Philosopher Explains What Consciousness Is - Philip Goff YouTube · 2023
- Consciousness and Cosmic Purpose | Philip Goff on the Fine-Tuning of the Universe and Panpsychism YouTube · 2023
- Philip Goff vs 3 atheists, is there a limited God? The SciPhi Show 15 YouTube · 2025
- Is the Universe Conscious? - Panpsychism with Philip Goff YouTube · 2019
- Philip Goff: Consciousness, Panpsychism, and the Philosophy of Mind | Lex Fridman Podcast #261 YouTube · 2022
- Why Does The Universe Exist? Panpsychism, Fine-Tuning & Cosmic Purpose | Philip Goff YouTube · 2025
- Exploring Consciousness and Non-Ordinary Religion, Panpsychism, and Heretical Ideas — Philip Goff YouTube · 2025
- Philip Goff: Consciousness, Panpsychism, and the Philosophy of Mind | Lex Fridman Podcast #261 YouTube · 2022
- Consciousness and Cosmic Purpose | Philip Goff on the Fine-Tuning of the Universe and Panpsychism YouTube · 2023
- Philip Goff: Consciousness, Panpsychism, and the Philosophy of Mind | Lex Fridman Podcast #261 YouTube · 2022
- Why Does The Universe Exist? Panpsychism, Fine-Tuning & Cosmic Purpose | Philip Goff YouTube · 2025
- Is the Universe Conscious? - Panpsychism with Philip Goff YouTube · 2019
- Full Debate | The Secrets of Consciousness | Philip Goff, Susan Blackmore, Nicholas Humphrey YouTube · 2018
- Philip Goff: Consciousness, Panpsychism, and the Philosophy of Mind | Lex Fridman Podcast #261 YouTube · 2022
- Philip Goff vs 3 atheists, is there a limited God? The SciPhi Show 15 YouTube · 2025
- Philip Goff vs 3 atheists, is there a limited God? The SciPhi Show 15 YouTube · 2025
- Does God Have Limited Power? | Debate Between William Lane Craig & Philip Goff YouTube · 2025
- Debating God With The Archbishop of Canterbury, Philip Goff, and Elizabeth Oldfield YouTube · 2024
- Did God Create Reality? William Lane Craig, Philip Goff, Jessica Frazier and Joe Folley Debate YouTube · 2026
- Debating William Lane Craig, Philip Goff, and Jessica Frazier on God and Morality YouTube · 2026
- Philosopher Explains What Consciousness Is - Philip Goff YouTube · 2023
- Why Your Brain Doesn't Create Consciousness: It's Always Been There (ft. Philip Goff) YouTube · 2026
- Consciousness and Cosmic Purpose | Philip Goff on the Fine-Tuning of the Universe and Panpsychism YouTube · 2023
- Why Your Brain Doesn't Create Consciousness: It's Always Been There (ft. Philip Goff) YouTube · 2026
- Exploring Consciousness and Non-Ordinary Religion, Panpsychism, and Heretical Ideas — Philip Goff YouTube · 2025
- Philosopher Explains What Consciousness Is - Philip Goff YouTube · 2023
- Philosopher Explains What Consciousness Is - Philip Goff YouTube · 2023
- Philip Goff vs 3 atheists, is there a limited God? The SciPhi Show 15 YouTube · 2025
- Why Does The Universe Exist? Panpsychism, Fine-Tuning & Cosmic Purpose | Philip Goff YouTube · 2025
- Is Consciousness Everywhere? | Ep. 38 | Dr Philip Goff on Panpsychism & the Meaning of the Universe YouTube · 2026
- Debating God With The Archbishop of Canterbury, Philip Goff, and Elizabeth Oldfield YouTube · 2024
- Debating God With The Archbishop of Canterbury, Philip Goff, and Elizabeth Oldfield YouTube · 2024
- The Universe Fine-Tuned Itself - God Not Needed | Philip Goff YouTube · 2025
- Consciousness and Cosmic Purpose | Philip Goff on the Fine-Tuning of the Universe and Panpsychism YouTube · 2023
- Exploring Consciousness and Non-Ordinary Religion, Panpsychism, and Heretical Ideas — Philip Goff YouTube · 2025
- Panpsychism & The Purpose of Our Universe | Philip Goff's New Book YouTube · 2023
- Philip Goff vs 3 atheists, is there a limited God? The SciPhi Show 15 YouTube · 2025
- Does God Have Limited Powers? A Debate with Philip Goff YouTube · 2026
- Exploring Consciousness and Non-Ordinary Religion, Panpsychism, and Heretical Ideas — Philip Goff YouTube · 2025
- Exploring Consciousness and Non-Ordinary Religion, Panpsychism, and Heretical Ideas — Philip Goff YouTube · 2025
- Debating God With The Archbishop of Canterbury, Philip Goff, and Elizabeth Oldfield YouTube · 2024
- Philip Goff vs 3 atheists, is there a limited God? The SciPhi Show 15 YouTube · 2025
- Philip Goff: Consciousness, Panpsychism, and the Philosophy of Mind | Lex Fridman Podcast #261 YouTube · 2022
- Philip Goff: Consciousness, Panpsychism, and the Philosophy of Mind | Lex Fridman Podcast #261 YouTube · 2022
- Panpsychism & The Purpose of Our Universe | Philip Goff's New Book YouTube · 2023
- Exploring Consciousness and Non-Ordinary Religion, Panpsychism, and Heretical Ideas — Philip Goff YouTube · 2025
- Philip Goff vs 3 atheists, is there a limited God? The SciPhi Show 15 YouTube · 2025
- Exploring Consciousness and Non-Ordinary Religion, Panpsychism, and Heretical Ideas — Philip Goff YouTube · 2025
- Philip Goff vs 3 atheists, is there a limited God? The SciPhi Show 15 YouTube · 2025