♪♫♪
Voices of todayRoger Scruton

Roger Scruton

Philosopher of beauty, music and the sacred; argued that beauty is a real value, not mere taste.

PhilosopherWriter1944 · 2020 United Kingdom

12 videos analysed · 42 quotes checked word for word · updated 2026-10-22

In 30 secondsScruton was an English philosopher (1944-2020). On this site we keep only his work on beauty, art, music, religion and the human person. He argued that beauty matters and has a transcendent side, and that art and architecture should not abandon it. He was an Anglican who held that the sacred is a real dimension of human life, reached by a leap of faith rather than by proof. In ethics he was a deontologist.
Key facts

Positions

click a row to see the evidence
Does God exist?God
AtheismTheism
Stated explicitly
Position

He was an Anglican and defended the religious way of life. He also offered an 'argument from beauty': natural beauty can reveal God's presence. He did not claim proof. In a 2000 interview he said he had 'worked my way back to something like the God idea', not the God of organised religion; he calls his faith a 'God feeling' that the world is incomplete and depends on something greater that words cannot capture, and says he has no systematic theology.

Why
What is objected, and the reply

How can a good God allow so much suffering?

Scruton

He traces all evil to human choice, and says it is not his business to produce a theodicy.

A God that cannot be put into words is too vague to be worth believing in.

Scruton

He concedes that he has no systematic theology and cannot answer every question. For him we know the transcendent only negatively, at the edge of thought.

Mixed : Freedom has a price: evil does not contradict God

Is the mind more than matter?Mind and body
MaterialismDualism
Interpretation
Position

He defended 'cognitive dualism': two ways of understanding the world, the scientific and the personal, neither reducible to the other. Reviewers say this is not a Cartesian soul.

Why
  • The encounter between an I and a you is meeting a point of view I could never occupy; I can reach it only by leaps of the imagination, a knowledge different from ordinary empirical knowledge. Video 2018 · Sir Roger Scruton / Dr. Jordan…
What is objected, and the reply

Neuroscience will show that persons are only brains, and that talk of minds belongs to an old theory.

Scruton

He answers that meeting another person is meeting a point of view I could never occupy, which I can reach only by leaps of the imagination: a knowledge different from ordinary empirical knowledge.

Are we truly free?Freedom
Determinism (no free will)Free will
Interpretation
Position

In the Gifford Lectures he stresses 'the relation between freely choosing persons' and says the scientific picture leaves it out. He does not state a position on determinism there. In a 2018 conversation he described his ideal of freedom as order revealed through free gestures, like a Bach fugue where every note is necessary yet free.

What makes an action good?Basis of morality
Duty (deontology)Consequences (consequentialism)Character (virtue ethics)Other (divine law, relationships, value creation…)
Stated explicitly
Position

He defended a deontological view, against Peter Singer's utilitarianism, in Animal Rights and Wrongs (2000).

Can reason judge everything, faith included?Faith and reason
Primacy of faith / the heartReason alone judges
Interpretation
Position

He held that rational argument goes only so far and that faith is a leap beyond reason.

Why
What is objected, and the reply

It is wrong to believe on insufficient evidence.

Scruton

He answers that faith is a leap over the edge of reason, but not an irrational one, any more than falling in love is irrational.

No sourced position yet on: Source of knowledge, Certainty, Status of morality, Meaning of life, Human nature.

On the big questions

Does God exist?Theism

A practising Anglican who gave the 2010 Gifford Lectures, 'The Face of God'. He says we meet God only as the spark in the most deprived person, and that there is no need to go further.

Why
What is objected, and the reply

How can a good God allow so much suffering?

Scruton

He traces all evil to human choice, and says it is not his business to produce a theodicy.

A God that cannot be put into words is too vague to be worth believing in.

Scruton

He concedes that he has no systematic theology and cannot answer every question. For him we know the transcendent only negatively, at the edge of thought.

Mixed : Freedom has a price: evil does not contradict God

The question on the site: all the arguments
Is the mind the brain?The mind is not matter

Closest camp: persons cannot be reduced to brain science, though he rejects a separate soul-substance.

Why
  • The encounter between an I and a you is meeting a point of view I could never occupy; I can reach it only by leaps of the imagination, a knowledge different from ordinary empirical knowledge. Video 2018 · Sir Roger Scruton / Dr. Jordan…
What is objected, and the reply

Neuroscience will show that persons are only brains, and that talk of minds belongs to an old theory.

Scruton

He answers that meeting another person is meeting a point of view I could never occupy, which I can reach only by leaps of the imagination: a knowledge different from ordinary empirical knowledge.

The question on the site: all the arguments
Should we believe without proof?Faith goes beyond

He called faith 'a leap over reason's edge', yet not irrational, 'any more than falling in love is irrational'. He defends learned, repeated prayers (Hail Mary, Shema) as a way across the distance to God.

Why
What is objected, and the reply

It is wrong to believe on insufficient evidence.

Scruton

He answers that faith is a leap over the edge of reason, but not an irrational one, any more than falling in love is irrational.

The question on the site: all the arguments
Do animals matter as much as we do?A duty of compassion

Closest camp: he held that rights carry duties, so animals cannot have human-style rights, but that we owe different duties to pets, farm animals and wild animals.

Criticizes : Speciesism: counting everyone's interests, whatever the species

The question on the site: all the arguments
Is beauty in the eye of the beholder?Beauty is in things

Closest camp: for the BBC film he defended the 'importance and transcendental nature of beauty', and held that natural beauty can point to God. He says good and bad in art are not mere taste (education must teach children to judge), that the rules of beauty are the byproduct of successful solutions, and that aesthetic and moral values are intertwined.

Why
What is objected, and the reply

Beauty is relative: ask a toad what beauty is.

Scruton

He answers that good and bad in art are not mere taste, and that children must be taught to tell music of lasting value from the ephemeral.

Beauty pleases without any concept or rule, so it cannot have rules.

Scruton

Answering a Kantian question, he says the rules of beauty are not laid down a priori: classical style is the résumé of inherited knowledge, a grammar of solutions that worked.

See 1 more objections

Taste is not a gift: it is a mark of social class.

No known reply from them.

Defends : We argue about beauty and educate our taste: so beauty concerns the object, not only the subjectMixed : The beautiful pleases all, without concept and without interest

The question on the site: all the arguments
Can science explain everything?True, but not everything

He said the popular scientific picture of humans leaves out the relation between free persons, 'wiping away the face of the world'. In 2014 he recalled that his generation looked for meaning in culture because science would not provide it.

Why
What is objected, and the reply

Physics fixes all the facts, so science can in principle answer every question, meaning included.

Scruton

He says science describes events under universal laws but leaves out the concepts we use for each other, such as responsibility, which come from the relations between persons. Science, like analytic philosophy, does not help with the question of meaning.

The question on the site: all the arguments
Are humans good by nature?Both at once

Closest camp: he sees human beings as free beings, close to what was meant by "made in the image of God", but imperfect: all evil comes from human choice, and people carry a basic resentment and anger that institutions and inherited customs must hold in check. He denies that people are simply made by their social conditions.

Why
What is objected, and the reply
T
Terry Eagleton

Human beings could be different under transformed political conditions: that is a major reason to be a Marxist.

Scruton

He answers that attempts to carry out that programme have always made things worse, perhaps because people are not created by political conditions but the other way round, and that this view forgets basic truths about human nature.

O

If evil comes from human freedom, then God, who gave that freedom, shares the responsibility.

Scruton

He does not exonerate God and says a theodicy is not his business. He adds that freedom is a precondition of love, and that bad events are not evil: only what is done freely is.

The question on the site: all the arguments

In their words

the leap of faith itself – this placing of your life at God's service – is a leap over reason's edge
feelings that that this world is not complete in itself that there is something upon which it depends and towards which it tends which is greater than it but which we can't put into words
the true power of religion is that it makes death itself into that Final Redemption so that you do come home at the very moment when you leave all your sufferings behind
My heart is in the aesthetic dimension of being I always has been
1 more quotes
the classical venacular which I've really been defending is not a style it's a grammar

How the ideas evolved

Click a step for details
  1. 1974Art and Imagination

    His first aesthetics book argues that aesthetic interest means appreciating something for its own sake.

  2. 1979The Aesthetics of Architecture

    He applies his philosophy of taste to buildings and city life.

  3. 1986Sexual Desire

    A philosophical account of desire built on the idea of treating the other person as a self, not as a thing. Martha Nussbaum praised the attempt but said he did not apply his principle consistently.

  4. 1997The Aesthetics of Music

    He extends his aesthetics to music, based on courses taught at Boston University.

  5. 2000Animal Rights and Wrongs

    He defends duties toward animals (pets, working animals, wild animals) from a deontological view and rejects Peter Singer's utilitarian approach.

  6. 2000Beauty and Consolation

    In a VPRO interview with Wim Kayzer he says philosophy satisfies but rarely consoles, and that he has 'worked his way back to something like the God idea'.

    In their words
    « being satisfied intellectually is not the same as being consoled being consoled means being at one with something and finding your place of rest there »Philosophy satisfies the mind but rarely consoles; he owes most to Kant and Wittgenstein yet finds neither consoling. watch
    « the philosophers that I've most in that I owe most to intellectually are K and Vicken Stein »He names Kant and Wittgenstein as the philosophers he owes most to. watch
    « the true power of religion is that it makes death itself into that Final Redemption so that you do come home at the very moment when you leave all your sufferings behind »Sees the power of religion in turning death into a final homecoming. watch
  7. 2009Why Beauty Matters

    He writes and presents a BBC Two film arguing for the importance and transcendental nature of beauty, and for restoring it to art, architecture and music.

  8. 2010The Face of God

    In his Gifford Lectures he argues that a purely scientific picture leaves out the relation between free persons who meet face to face, and asks what we lose when we give up belief in God.

  9. 2012Culture as wisdom

    Debating Terry Eagleton, he defends culture as practical wisdom to be passed on, not an ideology to debunk, and music as civilisation's greatest achievement after religion and science.

    In their words
    « culture as we teach it in universities is or or aspires to be a form of wisdom that is to be imparted to people »Defends culture as a form of wisdom to be passed on, not an ideology to be debunked. watch
    « I think of culture as a form of practical knowledge something which gives you a sense of uh what to do what to feel how to how to be towards other people »Culture is practical knowledge of what to feel and how to be with others. watch
    « the greatest achievement of our civilization if you leave religion and science to one side has been music »Calls music the greatest achievement of civilisation after religion and science. watch
  10. 2014Towards a humane philosophy

    He says analytic philosophy has valid arguments but does not address the question of meaning, and that science alone would not provide it.

    In their words
    « there is meaning in things and if you work hard enough and in the right way you can extract it but that science won't get you there »Recalls how his generation sought meaning in culture, since science would not provide it. watch
    « it doesn't help with these this great question of meaning »Respects analytic philosophy and its valid arguments but says it does not address the question of meaning. watch
  11. 2018God and beautiful buildings

    He argues that belief in God makes for more beautiful architecture, because a community should begin with an act of consecration.

  12. 2018Apprehending the Transcendent

    In Cambridge with Jordan Peterson he says we know the transcendent negatively, at the edge of thought, and meet God as a spark in the deprived.

    In their words
    « I take a position which I attribute also to Kant that um that we have a very clear negative understanding of it »On the transcendent: we know it negatively, at the edge of thought, and must cross that boundary by other ways than thinking. watch
    « when I address you I know that I'm addressing something which addresses me too but from a place where I could never be »Uses the I-you encounter as the model of transcendence: another person is a point of view I can reach only by imagination. watch
    « That's what a culture is. It's the residue of all the things that people have thought worthwhile to preserve. »Defines culture as what people found worth preserving, and says teaching it reconnects us to what matters. watch
  13. 2019'My heart is in the aesthetic dimension'

    In a late interview he says his real interest was always aesthetics and that art should redeem the human, not be propaganda.

    In their words
    « I have a great Belief in the redemptive character of art I think art should not be propaganda »Believes art redeems the human; it should not be propaganda or angry protest. watch
    « My heart is in the aesthetic dimension of being I always has been and My interest in philosophy grew out of that »Says his real interest has always been the aesthetic dimension, from which his philosophy grew. watch
    « that actually beauty matters to them, even if they don't care much about art »Argues everyday beauty (rooms, clothes, a laid table) matters to everyone. watch

The arguments 4

The site's arguments they defend or criticize, and why. Click a title to see the full argument.

Defends · 3
We argue about beauty and educate our taste: so beauty concerns the object, not only the subjectRoger Scruton · Is beauty in the eye of the beholder?

His own argument: we argue about beauty and try to educate taste, which makes sense only if the judgement is about the object and can be right or wrong.

The beautiful pleases all, without concept and without interestKant · Is beauty in the eye of the beholder?Mixed

Inspired by Kant, he argued beauty is a real, universal value rooted in our rational nature, while rejecting both pure subjectivism and pure objectivism as incomplete. Asked whether beauty's rules are given by nature, he replied that they are the byproduct of successful solutions, not laid down a priori.

Freedom has a price: evil does not contradict GodAlvin Plantinga · Does God exist?Mixed

He traces all evil to human choice, not to bad events, but adds that it is not his business to produce a theodicy and he does not exonerate God.

Criticizes · 1
Speciesism: counting everyone's interests, whatever the speciesPeter Singer · Do animals matter as much as we do?

He rejected Peter Singer's utilitarian case for animal equality, saying it lacks real philosophical argument.

Allies and opponents

Close, influences
Immanuel KantInfluence

Following Kant, he held that humans have a transcendental, sacred core shown in their capacity for self-reflection. He names Kant and Wittgenstein as the philosophers he owes most to, and builds his view of the transcendent on Kant's 'negative understanding'.

G. E. M. AnscombeInfluence

Elizabeth Anscombe, with Michael Tanner, supervised his PhD.

Martha NussbaumSparring partner

Nussbaum praised the seriousness of Sexual Desire but criticised how he applied his principle of otherness.

Ludwig WittgensteinInfluence

He names Wittgenstein, with Kant, as the philosopher he owes most to, though he finds neither consoling to read.

Jordan PetersonClose

In their 2018 Cambridge dialogue they explore the transcendent together; Scruton describes it as known negatively, at the edge of thought, and meets God as a spark in the most deprived.

TTerry EagletonSparring partner

In their 2012 debate he opposed Eagleton's Marxist-inspired, debunking view of culture, while calling it a particularly intelligent version of that view.

Disagree
Peter SingerDisagrees

He rejected Singer's utilitarian approach to animals, saying Singer's works contain little philosophical argument.

Do you agree with Scruton?

Take the Compass: 5 minutes to find out which philosophers you are closest to.

Take the test
All sources (36)
  1. Roger Scruton Wikipedia · 2025
  2. Why Beauty Matters Wikipedia (BBC Two, 28 November 2009) · 2009
  3. The Face of God (Gifford Lectures 2010) University of St Andrews · 2010
  4. Roger Scruton, Gifford Lectures giffordlectures.org · 2010
  5. The Soul of the World by Roger Scruton (review) Philosophers' Magazine · 2014 *
  6. Philosophy Minutes: Scruton on beauty Le Regard Libre · 2020 *
  7. Roger Scruton, Of Beauty and Consolation (Wim Kayzer, VPRO) YouTube (republication) · 2000
  8. We talked to Sir Roger Scruton (Spotniks / Estado da Arte) YouTube · 2019
  9. We talked to Sir Roger Scruton (Spotniks / Estado da Arte) YouTube · 2019
  10. We talked to Sir Roger Scruton (Spotniks / Estado da Arte) YouTube · 2019
  11. We talked to SIR ROGER SCRUTON, the greatest living thinker of CONSERVATISM YouTube · 2019
  12. Roger Scruton - The True, the Good and the Beautiful YouTube · 2017
  13. Roger Scruton on time, death, and eternity (Beauty and Consolation, VPRO 2000) YouTube (republication) · 2000
  14. Roger Scruton, Of Beauty and Consolation (Wim Kayzer, VPRO) YouTube (republication) · 2000
  15. Sir Roger Scruton / Dr. Jordan B. Peterson: Apprehending the Transcendent YouTube (Ralston College) · 2018
  16. What Conservatism Really Means - Roger Scruton in Conversation with Hamza Yusuf YouTube · 2018
  17. What Conservatism Really Means - Roger Scruton in Conversation with Hamza Yusuf YouTube · 2018
  18. Sir Roger Scruton / Dr. Jordan B. Peterson: Apprehending the Transcendent YouTube (Ralston College) · 2018
  19. Roger Scruton, Of Beauty and Consolation (Wim Kayzer, VPRO) YouTube (republication) · 2000
  20. Roger Scruton. Towards a humane Philosophy YouTube (republication) · 2014
  21. Roger Scruton. Towards a humane Philosophy YouTube (republication) · 2014
  22. Roger Scruton. Towards a humane Philosophy YouTube (republication) · 2014
  23. Roger Scruton - The True, the Good and the Beautiful YouTube (republication) · 2017
  24. Roger Scruton - The Tyranny of Pop Music YouTube (republication) · 2016
  25. Roger Scruton: Architecture and Aesthetic Education YouTube (republication) · 2014
  26. Roger Scruton: Architecture and Aesthetic Education YouTube (republication) · 2014
  27. Roger Scruton, Of Beauty and Consolation (Wim Kayzer, VPRO) YouTube (republication) · 2000
  28. Terry Eagleton in conversation with Roger Scruton (Intelligence Squared) YouTube (Intelligence Squared) · 2012
  29. Roger Scruton, Of Beauty and Consolation (Wim Kayzer, VPRO) YouTube (republication) · 2000
  30. Roger Scruton, Of Beauty and Consolation (Wim Kayzer, VPRO) YouTube (republication) · 2000
  31. Roger Scruton, Of Beauty and Consolation (Wim Kayzer, VPRO) YouTube (republication) · 2000
  32. Roger Scruton: Architecture and Aesthetic Education YouTube (republication) · 2014
  33. What Conservatism Really Means - Roger Scruton in Conversation with Hamza Yusuf YouTube · 2018
  34. Christina Hoff Sommers & Sir Roger Scruton: Free speech, philosophy, and art | VIEWPOINT YouTube (AEI) · 2017
  35. Terry Eagleton in conversation with Roger Scruton (Intelligence Squared) YouTube (Intelligence Squared) · 2012
  36. Terry Eagleton in conversation with Roger Scruton (Intelligence Squared) YouTube (Intelligence Squared) · 2012